Erratum: Nutrient profiling and food label claims: Evaluation of dairy products in three major European countries (European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2011) 65 (1032-1038) DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.52);Nutrient profiling and food label claims: Evaluation of dairy products in three major European countries

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1032-1038

  Trichterborn, J ^a   Harzer, G ^a   Kunz, C ^b  

^a Kraft Foods RD and Q Inc   (Germany)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

dairy products; food labelling; health claims; nutrient profiles

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; FAT; SATURATED FATTY ACID; SODIUM; SUGAR;

ARTICLE; CHEESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY PRODUCT; FAT CONTENT; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD PACKAGING; FRANCE; GERMANY; MARKET; MILK; MODEL; NUTRIENT; NUTRIENT PROFILING MODEL; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 80052560751     PISSN: 09543007     EISSN: 14765640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.171     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Aliments (2008). Table ciqual 2008-French food composition Table. Available at: Http://www.afssa.fr/ TableCIQUAL/.
2. Bech-Larsen T, Grunert KG (2003). The perceived healthiness of functional foods: A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers' perception of functional foods. Appetite 40, 9-14.
3. Choices International Foundation (2009). Qualifying criteria. Available at: Http://www.choicesinternational.org/index.php?option=com-content&task= view&id=31&Itemid=5 (last accessed December 2009).
4. Darmon N, Maillot M, Darmon M, Ambroise M (2007). Le SAIN et le LIM-Un système de profilage nutritionnelle pour orienter favorablement les choix des consommateurs? Le journées de la prevention-3es journées annuelles, 29/30 march 2007 (The SAIN and the LIM-A Nutrient Profiling System to Favourably Guide Consumers' Choice ?). INPES: Paris. Available at: Http://www.inpes.sante.fr/jp/cr/pdf/2007/Session8/session8-2903-mat/N. %20%20Darmon.pdf.
5. European Community (2006). Regulation (EC) no. 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Official J Eur Union L 404, 9-25.
6. Food and Drug Administration (2002a). Code of federal regulations, Title 21-food and drugs, chapter I-food and drug administration, department of health and human services, subchapter B-food for human consumption, part 101-food labeling, subpart A-general provisions, sec. 101.12 reference amounts customarily consumed per eating occasion. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
7. Food and Drug Administration (2002b). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21-Food and drugs, Chapter I-Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter B-Food for Human Consumption, Part 101-Food Labeling, Subpart A-General Provisions, Sec. 101.13-Nutrient content claims general principles, Sec. 101.14 Health claims: General requirements and Subpart F-Specific Requirements for Descriptive Claims That Are Neither Nutrient Content Claims nor Health Claims. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.
8. Food Standards Agency (2002). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods 6th summary edn. Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge.
9. Food Standards Agency (2009). Nutrient Profiling Technical Guidance April 2009. Food Standards Agency: London. Available at: Http:// www.food.gov.uk/ multimedia/pdfs/techguidenutprofiling.pdf.
10. Ford GT, Hastak M, Mitra A, Ringold DJ et al. (1996). Can consumers interpret nutrition information in the presence of a health claim? A laboratory investigation. J Public Policy Marketing 15, 16-27.
11. Geiger CJ (1998). Health claims: History, current regulatory status and consumer research. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 1312-1322.
12. Grunert KG, Wills JM (2007). A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 385-399.
13. Kirchhoff E (2005). Souci-Fachmann-Kraut: Food Composition and Nutrition Tables 7th edn. Medpharm Scientific Publishers: Stuttgart. Livsmedelverket Swedish National Food Administration (2009).
14. LIVSFS 2005:9 (as Last Amended by LIVSFS 2009:6) National Food Administration's Regulations on the use of a Particular Symbol. Livsmedelverket: Stockholm. Available at: Http://www.slv.se/upload/nfa/documents/food- regulations/Nyckelh%c3%a5l-dec-2009-6%20eng.pdf.
15. Ooshop (2009). Supermarché en ligne OOSHOP-Achat livraison boissons plats cuisinés produits frais surgelées. Available at: Http://www.ooshop.com/Home.aspx (last accessed December 2009).
16. Pothoulaki M, Chryssochoidis G (2009). Health claims: Consumers' matters. J Functional Foods 1, 222-228.
17. Sainsbury's (2009). Sainsbury's.co.uk-Groceries Available at: Http:// www.sainsburys.co.uk/groceries/index.jsp (last accessed December 2009).
18. Smart Choices Program (2009). Smart Choices Program-Nutrition Criteria for the Smart Choices Program Version 3, 29 July 2009. Available at: Http://www.smartchoicesprogram.com/pdf/Smart Choices Program Nutrition Criteria Matrix.pdf.
19. Teratanavat R, Hooker NH (2006). Consumer valuations and preference heterogeneity for a novel functional food. J Food Sci 71, 533-541.
20. Tesco (2009). Tesco.com-grocery. Available at: https://secure.tesco.com/ register/?vstore=99&from=http%3a%2f%2fwww.tesco.com%2fsuperstore%2fdefault. aspx (last accessed December 2009).
21. Trichterborn J, Harzer G, Kunz C (2011). Fine bakery wares with label claims in Europe and their categorisation by nutrient profiling models. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 307-312.
22. Tuorila H, Cardello AV (2002). Consumer responses to an off-flavour in juice in the presence of specific health claims. Food Qual Prefer 13, 561-569.
23. Van Trijp HCM, Van der Lans IA (2007). Consumer perception of nutrition and health claims. Appetite 48, 305-324.