College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics proficiency testing for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 765-769

  Brothman, Arthur R ^a   Dolan, Michelle M ^b   Goodman, Barbara K ^c   Park, Jonathan P ^d   Persons, Diane L ^e   Saxe, Debra F ^f   Tepperberg, James H ^g   Tsuchiya, Karen D ^h   Van Dyke, Daniel L ⁱ   Wilson, Kathleen S ^j   Wolff, Daynna J ^k   Theil, Karl S ^l  

^a ARUP LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^k MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^l LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

ACMG; CAP; CGH; cytogenomic microarray; proficiency testing; SNP

Indexed keywords

DNA; TELOMERASE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE;

CYTOGENETICS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LABORATORY; MEDICAL GENETICS; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TRISOMY 13;

CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; LABORATORIES; LABORATORY PROFICIENCY TESTING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80052559610     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821d3165     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86: 749-764.
2. Vissers LE, de Vries BB, Veltman JA. Genomic microarrays in mental retardation: from copy number variation to gene, from research to diagnosis. J Med Genet 2010;47:289-297.
3. Speicher MR, Carter NP. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:782-792. (Pubitemid 41400836)
4. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N, editors. ISCN (2005): An International System for Cytogenetic Nomeclature. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger, 2005:118-120.
5. Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ, editors. ISCN (2009): An International System for Cytogenetic Nomeclature. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger, 2009:121-128.
6. Shaffer LG, Beaudet AL, Brothman AR, et al. Microarray analysis for constitutional cytogenetic abnormalities. Genet Med 2007;9:654-662. (Pubitemid 47415276)
7. Vermeesch JR, Fiegler H, de Leeuw N, et al. Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15: 1105-1114. (Pubitemid 350011675)
8. Manning M, Hudgins L; Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. Genet Med 2010;12:742-745.
9. Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST, A Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med 2011;13:680-685.
10. Yatsenko SA, Shaw CA, Ou Z, et al. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA. J Mol Diag 2009;11:226-237.
11. Tsuchiya KD, Shaffer LG, Aradhya S, et al. Variability in interpreting and reporting copy number changes detected by array-based technology in clinical laboratories. Genet Med 2009;11:866-873.