Citizen controlled exchange of information in e-government

WEBIST 2011 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 494-499

  Gomes, Helder ^a   Zúquete, André ^a   Dias, Gonçalo Paiva ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b Campus Universitário de Santiago   (Portugal)

Author keywords

E government; Interoperability; Privacy

Indexed keywords

DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS; E-GOVERNMENT; EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION; GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS; PERSONAL INFORMATION; PRIVACY CONCERNS; PUBLIC SERVICES; TYPE OF SERVICES;

DATA PRIVACY; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 80052557113     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Al-Fedaghi, S. S. & Taha, M. M., 2006. Personal Informnation eWallet. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 2855-2862.
2. Bannister, F., 2005. The Panoptic State: Privacy, Surveillance and the Balance of Risk. Information Polity, 10(1/2), pp.65-78.
3. Brooks, L. & Agyekum-Ofosu, C., 2010. The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption in the UK. In Proceedings of the Transforming Government Workshop 2010 (tGov2010).
4. Burton, C., 2009. The Information Card Ecosystem: The Fundamental Leap from Cookies & Passwords to Cards & Selectors. Information Card Foundation.
5. Dias, G. & Rafael, J., 2007. A simple model and a distributed architecture for realizing one-stop e-government. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(1), pp.81-90. (Pubitemid 46469979)
6. Dutton, W. et al., 2005. The Cyber Trust Tension in E-government: Balancing Identity, Privacy, Security. Information Polity, 10(1/2), pp.13-23.
7. European Commission, 2003. The Role of eGovernment for Europe's Future.
8. Eynon, R., 2007. Breaking Barriers to eGovernment: Solutions for eGovernment, Deliverable 3. eGovernment Unit, DG Information Society and Media, European Commission, (29172).
9. Filho, A. R., 2005. e-Citizen: Why Waiting for the Governments? Ifip International Federation For Information Processing, pp.91-99.
10. Heeks, R., 2003. Most e-government-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? In iGovernment Working Paper Series. University of Manchester.
11. Klischewski, R., 2004. Information integration or process integration? How to achieve interoperability in administration. In Electronic Government: Proceedings of Third International Conference, EGOV 2004. Zaragoza, Spain: Springer, pp. 57-65.
12. Kubicek, H. & Cimander, R., 2009. Three dimensions of organizational interoperability: Insights from recent studies for improving interoperability frameworks. European Journal of ePractice, (January), pp.1-12.
13. Kubicek, H. & Hagen, M., 2000. One-Stop-Government in Europe: An overview. In One-Stop Government in Europe: Results from 11 National Surveys. Bremen: University of Bremen, pp. 1-38.
14. Lau, E., 2003. Challenges for E-Government Development. In 5th Global Forum on Reinventing Government. Mexico City, pp. 1-18.
15. Layne, K. & Lee, J., 2001. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, pp.122-136. (Pubitemid 33379949)
16. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003. The e-Government Imperative: Main Findings,
17. Tambouris, E. & Tarabanis, K., 2008. A dialogue-based, life-event oriented, active portal for online one-stop government: The OneStopGov platform. In The Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference. pp. 405-406.
18. United Nations & American Society for Public Administration, 2002. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective, New York: U. N. Publications.
19. Vintar, M., Kunstelj, M. & Leben, A., 2002. Delivery Better Quality Public Services Through Life-Event Portals. In 10th NISPAcce Annual Conference. Cracow, Poland.
20. Yildiz, M., 2007. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), pp.646-665.