Intergroup dialogue courses on sexual orientation: Lesbian, gay and bisexual student experiences and outcomes

Journal of Homosexuality

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1132-1150

  Dessel, Adrienne B ^a   Woodford, Michael R ^a   Warren, Naomi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bisexual; Gay; Intergroup dialogue; Lesbian; Sexual orientation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BISEXUALITY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; LESBIAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

BISEXUALITY; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HOMOSEXUALITY, FEMALE; HOMOSEXUALITY, MALE; HUMANS; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 80052551696     PISSN: 00918369     EISSN: 15403602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2011.598420     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Champagne, J. (2002). The easy way out: Gays and lesbians in academia. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies, 8, 227-240.
2. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London, UK: Sage.
3. Dessel, A. (2010). Effects of intergroup dialogue: Public school teachers and sexual orientation prejudice. Small Group Research, 41 (5), 556-592.
4. Dessel, A., & Rogge, M. (2008). Evaluation of intergroup dialogue: A review of the empirical Literature. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(2), 199-238.
5. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Evans, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (1999). Coming out in college residence halls: Negotiation, meaning making, challenges, supports. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 658-668.
7. Ford Difficult Dialogues Initiative. (2009). Retrieved from http://difficultdialogues.org/projects/.
8. Herek, G. M. (1993). Documenting prejudice against lesbians and gay men on campus: The Yale sexual orientation survey. Journal of Homosexuality, 25, 67-82.
9. Hurtado, S. (2003) Preparing college students for a diverse democracy: Final report to the U.S. Department of Education, OERI, Field Initiated Studies Program. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education.
10. Khuri, M. (2004). Facilitating Arab-Jewish intergroup dialogue in the college setting. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 7, 229-250.
11. McLean, K. (2008). Inside, outside, nowhere: Bisexual men and women in the gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 8, 63-80.
12. Miller, J., & Donner, S. (2000). More than just talk: The use of racial dialogues to combat racism. Social Work with Groups, 23, 31-53.
13. Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P., Sorensen, N., Gurin-Sands, C., & Osuna, S. (2009). From separate corners to dialogue and action. Race and Social Problems, 1, 45-55.
14. Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P., Sorensen, N., & Zúñiga, X. (2009). Evaluating intergroup dialogue: Engaging diversity for personal and social responsibility. Association of American Colleges & Universities, 12, 4-6.
15. Nagda, B. A., & Zúñiga, X. (2003). Fostering meaningful racial engagement through intergroup dialogues. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 111-128.
16. Rankin, S. R. (2002). Campus climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. The Diversity Factor, 12, 1-7.
17. Rankin, S. R. (2003). Campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people: A national perspective. New York, NY: The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.
18. Renn, K. A. (1998). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender students in the college classroom. In R. L. Sanlo (Ed.), Working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender college students: A handbook for faculty and administrators (pp. 231-237). Westport, CO: Greenwood Press.
19. Renn, K. A. (2007). LGBT student leaders and queer activists: Identities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identified college student leaders and activists. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 311-330.
20. Rozas, L. (2007). Engaging dialogue in our diverse social work student body: A multilevel theoretical process model. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 5-29.
21. Saguy, T., Dovidio, J., & Pratto, F. (2008). Beyond contact: Intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 432-445.
22. Silverschanz, P., Cortina, L. M., Konik, J., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Slurs, snubs, and queer jokes: Incidence and impact of heterosexist harassment in academia. Sex Roles, 58, 179-191.
23. Sorensen, N., Nagda, B. A., Gurin, P., & Maxwell, K. (2009). Taking a "hands on" approach to diversity in higher education: A critical-dialogic model for effective intergroup interaction. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 3-35.
24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Wallace, D. L. (2002). Out in the academy: Heterosexism, invisibility, and double consciousness. College English, 65(1), 53-66.
26. Wernick, L. J., Woodford, M. R., & Siden, J. (2011). Youth-led participatory action research: Fostering effective youth-adult partnerships. In L. M. Harter, J. Hamel-Lambert, & J. Millesen (Eds.), Case studies in community-based participatory research (pp. 165-186). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishers.
27. Yeakley, A. (1998). The nature of prejudice change: Positive and negative change processes arising from intergroup contact experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
28. Zúñiga, X., Nagda, B. A., Chesler, M., & Cytron-Walker, A. (2007). Intergroup dialogue in higher education: Meaningful learning about social justice. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 32, Number 4.