Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1581-1596

  Kim, Gibak ^a,b   Loizou, Philipos C ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

^b Soongsil University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAIN FUNCTION; MINIMAL EFFECTS; NOISE INTERFERENCE; PERCENTAGE POINTS; SPEECH DISTORTION; STEADY NOISE; TARGET SIGNALS;

ALGORITHMS; AMPLIFICATION; AUDITION; HEARING AIDS;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEARING AID; HUMAN; NOISE; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ALGORITHMS; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; HEARING AIDS; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 80052532239     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.3619790     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alcantara, J., Moore, B., Kuhnel, V., and Launer, S. (2003). Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid., Int. J. Audiol. 42, 34-42. 10.3109/14992020309056083 (Pubitemid 37372685)
2. Arehart, K., Kates, J., Anderson, M., and Harvey, L. (2007). Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1150-1164. 10.1121/1.2754061 (Pubitemid 47205512)
3. Baer, T., Moore, B., and Gatehouse, S. (1993). Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: Effects on intelligibility, quality and response times., J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 30, 49-72. (Pubitemid 23321083)
4. Bentler, R., and Chiou, L. (2006). Digital noise reduction: An overview., Trends Ampl. 10, 67-82. (Pubitemid 44257135)
5. Bentler, R., Wu, Y., Kettel, J., and Hurtig, R. (2008). Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies., Int. J. Audiol. 47, 447-460. 10.1080/14992020802033091
6. Chen, J., Benesty, J., Huang, Y., and Doclo, S. (2006). New insights into the noise reduction Wiener filter., IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14, 1218-1234. 10.1109/TSA.2005.860851 (Pubitemid 46547618)
7. Chung, K. (2004). Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids: Part, I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms., Trends Amplif. 8, 83-124. 10.1177/108471380400800302 (Pubitemid 40171173)
8. Dillon, H., and Lovegrove, R. (1993). Single-microphone noise reduction systems for hearing aids: A review and an evaluation, in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by, G. Studebaker, and, R. Hochberg, (Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), pp. 353-372.
9. Dubbelboer, F., and Houtgast, T. (2007). A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2865-2871. 10.1121/1.2783131
10. Edwards, B. (2004). Hearing aids and hearing impairment, in Speech Processing in the Auditory System, edited by, S. Greenberg, W. Ainsworth, A. Popper, and, R. Fay, (Springer Verlag, New York), pp. 339-421.
11. Ephraim, Y. (1992) Statistical-model-based speech enhancement systems, Proc. IEEE 80, 1526-1555. 10.1109/5.168664
12. Ephraim, Y., and Malah, D. (1984). Speech enhancement using a minimum mean-square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator., IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 32, 1109-1121. 10.1109/TASSP.1984.1164453 (Pubitemid 15159457)
13. Ephraim, Y., and Trees, H. V. (1995). A signal subspace approach for speech enhancement., IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 3, 251-266. 10.1109/89.397090
14. Graupe, D., Grosspietsch, J., and Basseas, S. (1987). A single-microphone-based self adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation., J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 24, 119-126. (Pubitemid 18020084)
15. Hawley, M., Litovsky, R., and Culling, J. (2004). The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: Effect of location and type of interferer., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 833-843. 10.1121/1.1639908 (Pubitemid 38200670)
16. Hu, Y., and Loizou, P. (2004). Incorporating a psychoacoustic model in frequency domain speech enhancement., IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 11, 270-273. 10.1109/LSP.2003.821714
17. Hu, Y., and Loizou, P. C. (2007a). A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1777-1786. 10.1121/1.2766778 (Pubitemid 47560539)
18. Hu, Y., and Loizou, P. C. (2007b). Subjective comparison and evaluation of speech enhancement algorithms., Speech Commun. 49, 588-601. 10.1016/j.specom.2006.12.006 (Pubitemid 47031352)
19. IEEE. (1969). IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements, IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoustics AU-17, 225-246.
20. Kawahara, H., Masuda-Katsuse, I., and de Cheveign, A. (1999). Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds., Speech Commun. 27, 187-207. 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00085-5
21. Kim, G., and Loizou, P. C. (2010). Improving speech intelligibility in noise using a binary mask that is based on magnitude spectrum constraints., IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 17, 1010-1013. 10.1109/LSP.2010.2087412
22. Kim, G., Lu, Y., Hu, Y., and Loizou, P. C. (2009). An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 1486-1494. 10.1121/1.3184603
23. Kuk, F., Ludvigsen, C., and Paludan-Muller, C. (2002). Improving hearing aid performance in noise: Challenges and strategies., Hear. J. 55, 34-46.
24. Latzel, M., Kiessling, J., and Margolf-Hackl, S. (2003). Optimizing noise suppression and comfort in hearing instruments., Hear. Rev. 10, 76-82.
25. Levitt, H. (1997). Digital hearing aids: Past, present and future, in Practical Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting, edited by, H. Tobin, (Department of Veteran Affairs, Washington, DC), pp. xi-xxiii.
26. Levitt, H., Bakke, M., Kates, J., Neuman, A., Schwander, T., and Weiss, M. (1993). Signal processing for hearing impairment., Scand. Audiol. 38, 7-19. (Pubitemid 23362788)
27. Li, N., and Loizou, P. C. (2008). The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 3947-3958. 10.1121/1.2997435
28. Lim, J. S. (1978). Evaluation of a correlation subtraction method for enhancing speech degraded by additive white noise, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 26, 471-472. 10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163129
29. Loizou, P. C. (2007). Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), pp. 541-580.
30. Loizou, P. C., and Kim, G. (2011). Reasons why speech enhancement algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility and suggested solutions., IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process. 19, 47-56. 10.1109/TASL.2010.2045180
31. Lu, Y., and Loizou, P. (2010). Speech enhancement by combining statistical estimators of speech and noise, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, pp. 4754-4757.
32. Luts, H., Eneman, K., Wouters, J., Schulte, M., Vormann, M., Buechler, M., Dillier, N., Houben, R., Dreschler, W. A., Froehlich, M., Puder, H., Grimm, G., Hohmann, V., Leijon, A., Lombard, A., Mauler, D., and Spriet, A. (2010). Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 1491-1505. 10.1121/1.3299168
33. Ma, J., Hu, Y., and Loizou, P. C. (2009). Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3387-3405. 10.1121/1.3097493
34. Neuman, A., and Schwander, T. (1987). The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise., J. Rehab. Res. Dev. 24, 127-134. (Pubitemid 18020085)
35. Noordhoek, I., and Drullman, R. (1997). Effect of reducing temporal intensity modulations on sentence intelligibility., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 498-502. 10.1121/1.417993 (Pubitemid 27026661)
36. Palmer, C., Bentler, R., and Mueller, H. (2006). Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds., Trends Amplif. 10, 95-104. 10.1177/1084713806289554 (Pubitemid 44257137)
37. Parikh, G., and Loizou, P. (2005). The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3874-3888. 10.1121/1.2118407 (Pubitemid 41820886)
38. Phatak, S., and Allen, J. (2007). Consonants and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2312-2326. 10.1121/1.2642397 (Pubitemid 46548430)
39. Rangachari, S., and Loizou, P. C. (2006). A noise-estimation algorithm for highly non-stationary environments., Speech Commun. 48, 220-231. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.08.005 (Pubitemid 43012033)
40. Scalart, P., and Filho, J. (1996). Speech enhancement based on a priori signal to noise estimation, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, pp. 629-632.
41. Schum, D. (2003). Noise-reduction circuitry in hearing aids: Goals and current strategies, Hear J. 56, 32-40.
42. Stelmachowicz, P., Lewis, D., Choi, S., and Hoover, B. (2007). Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children., Ear Hear. 28, 483-494. 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc265 (Pubitemid 47026221)
43. Stevens, K. (2002). Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1872-1891. 10.1121/1.1458026 (Pubitemid 34297244)
44. Tan, C.-T., and Moore, B. (2008). Perception of nonlinear distortion by hearing-impaired people., Int. J. Audiol. 47, 246-256. 10.1080/14992020801945493 (Pubitemid 351891672)
45. Tyler, R. S., and Kuk, F. K. (1989). The effects of noise suppression hearing aids on consonant recognition in speech-babble and low-frequency noise., Ear Hear. 10, 243-249. 10.1097/00003446-198908000-00006 (Pubitemid 19212493)
46. van Tasell, D., and Crain, T. (1992). Noise reduction hearing aids: Release from masking and release from distortion., Ear Hear. 13, 114-121. 10.1097/00003446-199204000-00008
47. Weiss, M., and Neuman, A. (1993). Noise reduction in hearing aids, in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by, G. Studebaker, and, R. Hochberg, (Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA), pp. 337-352.
48. Wiener, N. (1949). Interpolation, Extrapolation and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series (John Wiley and Sons, New York), pp. 1-163.