Use of 18F-fluoride PET to determine the appropriate tissue sampling region for improved sensitivity of tissue examinations in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 427-432

  Choe, Hyonmin ^a   Inaba, Yutaka ^a   Kobayashi, Naomi ^a   Ike, Hiroyuki ^a   Aoki, Chie ^a   Shizukuishi, Kazuya ^a   Iwamoto, Naoyuki ^a   Yukizawa, Yohei ^a   Ishida, Takashi ^a   Inoue, Tomio ^a   Saito, Tomoyuki ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORINE 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFLAMMATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; INFECTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FLUORINE RADIOISOTOPES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80052512496     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.594232     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bauer T W, Parvizi J, Kobayashi N, Krebs V. Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88 (4): 869-82.
2. Chacko T K, Zhuang H, Stevenson K, Moussavian B, Alavi A. The importance of the location of fuorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses. Nucl Med Commun 2002; 23 (9): 851-5.
3. Chryssikos T, Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Newberg A, Zhuang H, Alavi A. FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop 2008; (466) (6): 1338-42.
4. Delank K S, Schmidt M, Michael J W, Dietlein M, Schicha H, Eysel P. The implications of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 20.
5. Gallo J, Kaminek M, Myslivecek M, Zapletalova J, Spicka J. Validity of bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic complications in hydroxy-apatite-coated total hip arthroplasty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2004; 71 (6): 345-51.
6. Grant F D, Fahey F H, Packard A B, Davis R T, Alavi A, Treves S T. Skeletal PET with 18F-fuoride: applying new technology to an old tracer. J Nucl Med 2008; 49 (1): 68-78.
7. Installe J, Nzeusseu A, Bol A, Depresseux G, Devogelaer J P, Lonneux M. (18)F-fuoride PET for monitoring therapeutic response in Paget's disease of bone. J Nucl Med 2005; 46 (10): 1650-8.
8. Kobayashi N, Bauer T W, Tuohy M J, Lieberman I H, Krebs V, Togawa D, Fujishiro T, Procop G W. The comparison of pyrosequencing molecular Gram stain, culture, and conventional Gram stain for diagnosing orthopaedic infections. J Orthop Res 2006; 24 (8): 1641-9.
9. Kobayashi N, Procop G W, Krebs V, Kobayashi H, Bauer T W. Molecular identifcation of bacteria from aseptically loose implants. Clin Orthop 2008; (466) (7): 1716-25.
10. Kobayashi N, Inaba Y, Choe H, Iwamoto N, Ishida T, Yukizawa Y, Aoki C, Ike H, Saito T. Rapid and sensitive detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylo-coccus periprosthetic infections using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009; 64 (2): 172-6.
11. Lonner J H, Desai P, Dicesare P E, Steiner G, Zuckerman J D. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78 (10): 1553-8.
12. Moojen D J, van Hellemondt G, Vogely H C, Burger B J, Walenkamp G H, Tulp N J, Schreurs B W, de Meulemeester F R, Schot C S, van de Pol I, Fujishiro T, Schouls L M, Bauer T W, Dhert W J. Incidence of low-grade infection in aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (6): 667-73.
13. Nagoya S, Kaya M, Sasaki M, Tateda K, Yamashita T. Diagnosis of peri-prosthetic infection at the hip using triple-phase bone scintigraphy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (2): 140-4.
14. Pill S G, Parvizi J, Tang P H, Garino J P, Nelson C, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Comparison of fuorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and (111) indium-white blood cell imaging in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection of the hip. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 2) 2006; 21 (6): 91-7.
15. Reinartz P, Mumme T, Hermanns B, Cremerius U, Wirtz D C, Schaefer W M, Niethard F U, Buell U. Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: positron-emission tomography versus triple-phase bone scanning. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87 (4): 465-70.
16. Stumpe K D, Strobel K. 18F FDG-PET imaging in musculoskeletal infection. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 50 (2): 131-42.
17. Stumpe K D, Notzli H P, Zanetti M, Kamel E M, Hany T F, Gorres G W, von Schulthess G K, Hodler J. FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy. Radiology 2004; 231 (2): 333-41.
18. Tayama Y, Takahashi N, Oka T, Takahashi A, Aratake M, Saitou T, Inoue T. Clinical evaluation of the effect of attenuation correction technique on 18F-fuoride PET images. Ann Nucl Med 2007; 21 (2): 93-9.
19. Trampuz A, Zimmerli W. Diagnosis and treatment of implant-associated septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2008; 10 (5): 394-403.
20. Zhuang H, Duarte P S, Pourdehnad M, Maes A, Van Acker F, Shnier D, Garino J P, Fitzgerald R H, Alavi A. The promising role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42 (1): 44-8.