Covariate-adjusted difference in proportions from clinical trials using logistic regression and weighted risk differences

Drug Information Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 481-493

  Ge, Miaomiao ^a,b   Durham, L Kathryn ^a   Meyer, R Daniel ^a   Xie, Wangang ^c   Thomas, Neal ^a  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c ABBOTT LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochran Mantel Haenszel weights; Logistic regression; Risk difference; Unconditional approach; Weighted least squares approach

Indexed keywords

ENFUVIRTIDE; MARAVIROC; PLACEBO; VIRUS RNA;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COVARIANCE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1 INFECTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SIMULATION; VIRUS LOAD;

EID: 80052499148     PISSN: 00928615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009286151104500409     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Greenland S, Holland P. Estimating standardized risk differences from odds ratios. Biometrics. 1991;47:319-322.
2. O'Gorman T, Woolson R, Jones M. A comparison of two methods of estimating a common risk difference in a stratified analysis of a multicenter clinical trial. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:135-153.
3. Lipsitz S, Laird N, Molenberghs G. Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse. Biometrics. 1998;54:148-160.
4. Kim B, Carter R, Rao P, Ariet M, Resnick M. Standardized risk and description of results from multivariable modeling of a binary response. Biometric J. 2006;48:54-66.
5. Grizzle J. A note on stratifying versus complete random assignment in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1982;3:365-368.
6. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley; 1990.
7. Radhakrishna S. Combination of results from several 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrics. 1965;21:86-98.
8. Robins J, Breslow N, Greenland S. Estimators of the Mantel-Haenszel variance consistent in both sparse data and large-strata limiting models. Biometrics. 1986;42:311-323.
9. Sato T. On the variance estimator for the Mantel-Haenszel risk difference. Biometrics. 1989;45: 1323-1324.
10. Greenland S, Robins J. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985;41:55-68.
11. Mehrotra D, Railkar R. Minimum risk weights for comparing treatments in stratified binomial trials. Stat Med. 2000;19:811-825.
12. Grizzle J, Starmer C, Koch G. Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics. 1969;35: 817-819.
13. Boehning D, Sarol J. Estimating risk difference in multicenter studies under baseline-risk heterogeneity. Biometrics. 2000;56:304-308.
14. Kuhnert R, Böhning D. The failure of meta-analytic asymptotics for the seemingly efficient estimator of the common risk difference. Stat Papers. 2005;46:541-554.
15. Flanders WD, Rhodes PH. Large sample confidence intervals for regression standardized risks, risk ratios, and risk differences. J Chron Dis. 1987; 40:697-704.
16. Freedman D. Randomization does not justify logistic regression. Stat Sci. 2008;23:237-249.
17. Lane P, Nelder J. Analysis of covariance and standardization as instances of prediction. Biometrics. 1982;38:613-621.
18. Greenland S. Estimating standardized parameters from generalized linear models. Stat Med. 1991;10:1069-1074.
19. Gulick RM, Lalezari J, Goodrich J, et al. Maraviroc for previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1429-1441.
20. Hézode C, Forestier N, Dusheiko G, et al. Telaprevir and peginterferon with or without ribavirin for chronic HCV infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1839-1850.
21. Hoeffding W. On the distribution of the number of successes in independent trials. Ann Math Stat. 1956;27:713-721.
22. Robinson LD, Jewell NP. Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Stat Rev. 1991;58:227-240.
23. Fleiss J. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley; 1986.
24. Cochran W. Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics. 1954;10: 417-451.