Minimum risk weights for comparing treatments in stratified binomial trials

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 811-825

  Mehrotra, Devan V ^a   Railkar, Radha ^b  

^a MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK; SAMPLE; SIMULATION; STATISTICS;

ANTI-ARRHYTHMIA AGENTS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; METOPROLOL; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 0034732099     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000330)19:6<811::AID-SIM390>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Radhakrishna S. Combination of results from several 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrics 1965; 21:86-98.
2. Cochran WG. Some methods for strengthening the common chi-quare tests. Biometrics 1954; 10:417-451.
3. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1959; 22:719-748.
4. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Wiley: New York, 1983.
5. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986; 7:177-188.