Host plant volatiles induce oriented flight behaviour in male European grapevine moths, Lobesia botrana

Journal of Insect Physiology

Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1323-1331

  von Arx, Martin ^a   Schmidt Büsser, Daniela ^a   Guerin, Patrick M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; European grapevine moth; Host plant volatiles; Lobesia botrana; Tortricidae; Wind tunnel

Indexed keywords

PLANT EXTRACT; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ALCOHOL; ALDEHYDE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ECOPHYSIOLOGY; FLIGHT BEHAVIOR; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HOST PLANT; MATE CHOICE; MOTH; OLFACTORY CUE; SEX PHEROMONE; TERPENE; VINE; VOLATILE SUBSTANCE; WIND TUNNEL;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANTENNA (ORGAN); ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FLYING; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; MOTH; PARASITOLOGY; VITIS;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPOD ANTENNAE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; FEMALE; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; MALE; MOTHS; PLANT EXTRACTS; VITIS; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EUROPE;

LEPIDOPTERA; LOBESIA BOTRANA; TORTRICIDAE; VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 80052484569     PISSN: 00221910     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anfora G., Tasin M., De Cristofaro A., Ioriatti C., Lucchi A. Synthetic grape volatiles attract mated Lobesia botrana females in laboratory and field bioassays. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2009, 35:1054-1062.
2. Ansebo L., Coracini M.D.A., Bengtsson M., Liblikas I., Ramirez M., Borg-Karlson A.K., Tasin M., Witzgall P. Antennal and behavioural response of codling moth Cydia pomonella to plant volatiles. Journal of Applied Entomology 2004, 128:488-493.
3. Arn H., Rauscher S., Guerin P.M., Buser H.R. Sex pheromone blends of 3 tortricid pests in European vineyards. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 1988, 21:111-117.
4. Arn H., Städler E., Rauscher S. The electroantennographic detector - A selective and sensitive tool in gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 1975, 30:722-725.
5. Ashman T.L. Sniffing out patterns of sexual dimorphism in floral scent. Functional Ecology 2009, 23:852-862.
6. Becher P.G., Guerin P.M. Oriented responses of grapevine moth larvae Lobesia botrana to volatiles from host plants and an artificial diet on a locomotion compensator. Journal of Insect Physiology 2009, 55:384-393.
7. Bengtsson M., Bäckman A.C., Liblikas I., Ramirez M.I., Borg-Karlson A.K., Ansebo L., Anderson P., Lofqvist J., Witzgall P. Plant odor analysis of apple: antennal response of codling moth females to apple volatiles during phenological development. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2001, 49:3736-3741.
8. Bengtsson M., Jaastad G., Knudsen G., Kobro S., Bäckman A.C., Pettersson E., Witzgall P. Plant volatiles mediate attraction to host and non-host plant in apple fruit moth, Argyresthia conjugella. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2006, 118:77-85.
9. Bovey, R., Baggiolini, M., Bolay, A., Bovay, E., Corbaz, R., Mathys, G., 1972. La défense des plantes cultivées, Editions Payot, Lausanne.
10. Bruce T.J.A., Wadhams J., Woodcock C.M. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science 2005, 10:269-274.
11. Charmillot P.J., Pasquier D. Vers de la grappe: technique de confusion, lutte classique et dynamique des populations. Revue suisse de viticulture arboriculture horticulture 2000, 32:315-320.
12. Coracini M., Bengtsson M., Liblikas I., Witzgall P. Attraction of codling moth males to apple volatiles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2004, 110:1-10.
13. El-Sayed A., Gödde J., Arn H. Sprayer for quantitative application of odor stimuli. Environmental Entomology 1999, 28:947-953.
14. El-Sayed A., Gödde J., Witzgall P., Arn H. Characterization of pheromone blend for grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana by using flight track recording. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1999, 25:389-400.
15. Flamini G., Cioni P.L., Morelli I. Differences in the fragrances of pollen and different floral parts of male and female flowers of Laurus nobilis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2002, 50:4647-4652.
16. Fraenkel G.S. The raison d'être of secondary plant substances. Science 1959, 129:1466-1470.
17. Galet, P., 1982. Les maladies et les parasites de la vigne, Imprimerie du paysan du midi, Montpellier.
18. Guerin P.M., Städler E., Buser H.R. Identification of host plant attractants for the carrot fly, Psila rosae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1983, 9:843-861.
19. Jhumur U.S., Dötterl S., Jürgens A. Floral odors of Silene otites: their variability and attractiveness to mosquitoes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2008, 34:14-25.
20. Katerinopoulos H.E., Pagona G., Afratis A., Stratigakis N., Roditakis N. Composition and insect attracting activity of the essential oil of Rosmarinus officinalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2005, 31:111-122.
21. Knudsen J.T., Eriksson R., Gershenzon J., Stahl B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Botanical Review 2006, 72:1-120.
22. Knudsen J.T., Tollsten L., Bergström L.G. Floral scents - A checklist of volatile compounds isolated by headspace techniques. Phytochemistry 1993, 33:253-280.
23. Landolt P.J., Phillips T.W. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 1997, 42:371-391.
24. Masante-Roca I., Gadenne C., Anton S. Three-dimensional antennal lobe atlas of male and female moths, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and glomerular representation of plant volatiles in females. Journal of Experimental Biology 2005, 208:1147-1159.
25. Masante-Roca I., Anton S., Delbac L., Dufour M.C., Gadenne C. Attraction of the grapevine moth to host and non-host plant parts in the wind tunnel: effects of plant phenology, sex, and mating status. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2007, 122:239-245.
26. Miller J.R., Gut L.J., de Lame F.M., Stelinski L.L. Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechansims mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (Part 1): theory. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2006, 32:2089-2114.
27. Najar-Rodriguez A.J., Galizia C.G., Stierle J., Dorn S. Behavioral and neurophysiological responses of an insect to changing ratios of constituents in host plant-derived volatile mixtures. Journal of Experimental Biology 2010, 213:3388-3397.
28. Olsson P.O., Anderbrant O., Lofstedt C. Flight and oviposition behavior of Ephestia cautella and Plodia interpunctella in response to odors of different chocolate products. Journal of Insect Behavior 2005, 18:363-380.
29. Pinero J.C., Dorn S. Synergism between aromatic compounds and green leaf volatiles derived from the host plant underlies female attraction in the oriental fruit moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2007, 125:185-194.
30. Rauscher S., Arn H., Guerin P. Effects of dodecyl acetate and Z-10-tridecenyl acetate on attraction of Eupoecilia ambiguella males to the main sex pheromone component, Z-9-dodecenyl acetate. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1984, 10:253-264.
31. Savopoulou-Soultani M., Milonas P.G., Stavridis D.G. Role of availability of food to the adult Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in its reproductive performance. Journal of Economic Entomology 1998, 91:1341-1348.
32. Schmidt-Büsser D., von Arx M., Guerin P.M. Host plant volatiles serve to increase the response of male European grape berry moths, Eupoecilia ambiguella, to its sex pheromone. Journal of Comparative Physiolology A 2009, 195:853-864.
33. Schmidt-Büsser D., von Arx M., Connétable S., Guerin P.M. Identification of host-plant chemical stimuli for the European grape berry moth Eupoecilia ambiguella. Physiological Entomology 2011, 36:101-110.
34. Taneja J., Guerin P.M. Ammonia attracts the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans: Behavioural and neurophysiological data on nymphs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 1997, 181:21-34.
35. Tasin M., Anfora G., Ioriatti C., Carlin S., De Cristofaro A., Schmidt S., Bengtsson M., Versini G., Witzgall P. Antennal and behavioral responses of grapevine moth Lobesia botrana females to volatiles from grapevine. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2005, 31:77-87.
36. Tasin M., Bäckman A.-C., Coracini M., Casado D., Ioriatti C., Witzgall P. Synergism and redundancy in a plant volatile blend attracting grapevine moth females. Phytochemistry 2007, 68:203-209.
37. Tasin M., Bäckman A.C., Anfora G., Carlin S., Ioriatti C., Witzgall P. Attraction of female grapevine moth to common and specific olfactory cues from 2 host plants. Chemical Senses 2010, 35:57-64.
38. Tasin M., Bäckman A.C., Bengtsson M., Varela N., Ioriatti C., Witzgall P. Wind tunnel attraction of grapevine moth females, Lobesia botrana, to natural and artificial grape odour. Chemoecology 2006, 16:87-92.
39. Tasin M., Bäckmann A., Bengtsson M., Ioriatti C., Witzgall P. Essential host plant cues in the grapevine moth. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93:141-144.
40. Thiery D., Moreau J. Relative performance of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) on grapes and other hosts. Oecologia 2005, 143:548-557.
41. Torres-Vila L.M., Rodriguez-Molina M.C., Stockel J. Delayed mating reduces reproductive output of female European grapevine moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 2002, 92:241-249.
42. Torres-Vila L.M., Stockel J., Roehrich R. Le potentiel reproducteur et ses variables biotiques associées chez le mâle de l'Eudémis de la vigne Lobesia botrana. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1995, 77:105-119.
43. Visser J.H. Host odour perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 1986, 31:121-144.
44. Witzgall P., Tasin M., Buser H.R., Wegner-Kiss G., Mancebon V.S.M., Ioriatti C., Bäckman A.C., Bengtsson M., Lehmann L., Francke W. New pheromone components of the grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2005, 31:2923-2932.
45. Yang Z.H., Bengtsson M., Witzgall P. Host plant volatiles synergize response to sex pheromone in codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2004, 30:619-629.