A fine-grained spatial prediction model for the red-listed vascular plant Scorzonera humilis

Nordic Journal of Botany

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 495-504

  Edvardsen, Anette ^a   Bakkestuen, Vegar ^a   Halvorsen, Rune ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTITUDE; ARABLE LAND; AUTECOLOGY; DATA ACQUISITION; DICOTYLEDON; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GRASSLAND; LAND COVER; MODEL TEST; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; RARE SPECIES; RED LIST; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; VASCULAR PLANT; VEGETATION MAPPING;

NORWAY;

SCORZONERA; SCORZONERA HUMILIS; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 80052474579     PISSN: 0107055X     EISSN: 17561051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00984.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anonymous. 2008. ArcGIS, ver. 9.3. ESRI Inc. Redlands, California.
2. Araújo, M. B. and Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1677-1688.
3. Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol. Modell. 200: 1-19.
4. Baillie, J. E. M. et al. 2004. 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species. A global species assessment. IUCN Species Survival Commission.
5. Bakkestuen, V. 2009. GIS as a tool for studying temporal and spatial patterns in Norwegian ecosystems across disciplines and scales PhD thesis, Univ. of Oslo.
6. Begon, M. et al. 1996. Ecology: individuals, populations and communities 3rd ed. Blackwell.
7. Bjørdal, I. 2007. Markslagsklassifikasjon i økonomisk kartverk. Handbok Skog Landskap, pp. 1-89.
8. Cousins, S. A. O. and Eriksson, O. 2002. The influence of management history and habitat on plant species richness in a rural hemiboreal landscape, Sweden. Landsc. Ecol. 17: 517-529.
9. Edwards, T. C. J. et al. 2005. Model-based stratifications for enhancing the detection of rare ecological events. Ecology 86: 1081-1090.
10. Edwards, T. C. J. et al. 2006. Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models. Ecol. Modell. 199: 132-141.
11. Elith, J. and Graham, C. H. 2009. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 32: 66-77.
12. Elith, J. and Leathwick, J. R. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 677-697.
13. Elith, J. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
14. Elith, J. et al. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17: 43-57.
15. Engler, R. et al. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 263-274.
16. Franklin, J. 2009. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge Univ. Press.
17. Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Modell. 135: 147-186.
18. Guisan, A. et al. 2006a. Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. Conserv. Biol. 20: 501-511.
19. Guisan, A. et al. 2006b. Making better geographical predictions of species' distributions. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 386-392.
20. Guisan, A. et al. 2007. Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers. Distrib. 13: 332-340.
21. Haines-Young, R. et al. 2003. Changing landscapes, habitats and vegetation diversity across Great Britain. J. Environm. Manage. 67: 267-281.
22. Halvorsen, R. et al. 2009. Ny norsk naturtypeinndeling ver. 1.0 .
23. Hirzel, A. H. et al. 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol. Modell. 199: 142-152.
24. Hirzel, A. H. and Le Lay, G. 2008. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1372-1381.
25. Jaynes, E. T. 1957. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106: 620-630.
26. Jiménez-Valverde, A. and Lobo, J. 2007. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecol. 31: 361-369.
27. Jiménez-Valverde, A. et al. 2008. Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 14: 885-890.
28. Kålås, J. A. et al. 2006. Norsk rødliste 2006-2006 Norwegian red list. Artsdatabanken, Norge.
29. Kålås, J. A. et al (eds), Norsk rødliste for arter 2010 - The 2010 Norwegian red list for species. Artsdatabanken, Norge 2010.
30. Lid, J. and Lid, D. T. 2005. Norsk flora. 7 utgåve ved R. Elven. Det Norske Samlaget.
31. Lobo, J. M. 2008. More complex distribution models or more representative data?. Biodiv. Inform. 5: 14-19.
32. Lobo, J. M. et al. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 145-151.
33. Loiselle, B. A. et al. 2008. Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes?. J. Biogeogr. 35: 105-116.
34. Luoto, M. et al. 2003. Loss of plant species richness and habitat connectivity in grasslands associated with agricultural change in Finland. Ambio 32: 447-452.
35. Maggini, R. et al. 2006. Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities. J. Biogeogr. 33: 1729-1749.
36. Marage, D. et al. 2008. The influence of management history on spatial prediction of Eryngium spinalba, an endangered endemic species. Appl. Veg. Sci. 11: 139-148.
37. Milberg, P. and Persson, T. S. 1994. Soil seed bank and species recruitment in road verge grassland vegetation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 31: 155-162.
38. Moen, A. 1998. National atlas of Norway: vegetation. Norwegian Mapping Authority.
39. Moore, I. D. et al. 1991. Digital terrain modeling - a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol. Proc. 5: 3-30.
40. Norderhaug, A. et al. 2010. Naturindeks for Norge 2010: åpent lavland. Dir. Naturforv. Utredn. 3: 70-78.
41. Økland, R. H. 1989. Hydromorphology and phytogeography of mires in inner Østfold and adjacent part of Akershus, SE Norway, in relation to regional variation in SE Fennoscandian mires. Opera Bot. 96: 1-122.
42. Parolo, G. et al. 2008. Toward improved species niche modelling: Arnica montana in the Alps as a case study. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1410-1418.
43. Pearce, J. and Ferrier, S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol. Modell. 133: 225-245.
44. Peterson, A. T. 2003. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q. Rev. Biol. 78: 419-433.
45. Peterson, A. T. et al. 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30: 550-560.
46. Phillips, S. J. and Dudík, M. 2008. Modeling of species distribution with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
47. Phillips, S. J. et al. 2006. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190: 231-259.
48. Phillips, S. J. et al. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 19: 181-197.
49. Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. 2006. The value of the IUCN red list for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 71-76.
50. Venables, W. N. and Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer.
51. Ward, G. et al. 2009. Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. Biometrics 65: 554-563.
52. Wisz, M. S. et al. 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 14: 763-773.
53. Wollan, A. et al. 2008. Modelling and predicting fungal distribution patterns using herbarium data. J. Biogeogr. 35: 2298-2310.
54. Yoccoz, N. G. et al. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 446-453.