Reproducibility of landmark identification in the jaw and teeth on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images: A preliminary study of tentative methods compared to those based on cephalometric definitions

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 843-849

  Fuyamada, Mariko ^a   Nawa, Hiroyuki ^a   Shibata, Momoko ^a   Yoshida, Kazuhito ^a   Kise, Yoshitaka ^a   Katsumata, Akitoshi ^b   Ariji, Eiichiro ^a   Goto, Shigemi ^a  

^a AICHI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ASAHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anatomy, cross sectional; Cone beam computed tomography; Imaging; Reproducibility of results; Three dimensional

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INCISOR; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOOTH;

EID: 80052466173     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 19457103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/010711-5.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kawamata A, Ariji Y, Langlais RP. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000;44:395-410.
2. Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, Ariji E, Nakamura H. Evaluation of correspondence of dental computed tomography imaging to anatomic observation of external root resorption. J Endod. 2009;35:1594-1597.
3. Hatano Y, Kurita K, Kuroiwa Y, Yuasa H, Ariji E. Clinical evaluation of coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy) for mandibular third molars using dental computed tomography: a case-control study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1806-1814.
4. Naitoh M, Nabeshima H, Hayashi H, Nakayama T, Kurita K, Ariji E. Postoperative assessment of incisor dental implants using cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36:377-384.
5. Ariji Y, Kawamata A, Yoshida K, et al. Three-dimensional morphology of the masseter muscle in patients with mandibular prognathism. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000;29:113-118.
6. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;99:212-220. (Pubitemid 40127200)
7. Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji Y, et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:382-390. (Pubitemid 44233355)
8. Maeda M, Katsumata A, Ariji Y, et al. Changes in skeletal asymmetry after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism: three-dimensional computed tomographic assessment. Oral Radiol. 2007;23:10-15. (Pubitemid 47012474)
9. Maki K, Inoue N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(suppl 1):95-101.
10. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveria AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387-395.
11. Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazäo DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:28-37.
12. Yitschaky O, Redlich M, Abed Y, Faerman M, Casap N, Hiller N. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:13-18.
13. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:402-411.
14. Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and threedimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:111-116. (Pubitemid 27119981)
15. Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:600.e23-600.e34.
16. de Oliveria AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:256-265.
17. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part I. Accuracy and reproducibility. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:112-117.
18. Cavalcanti M G P, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:170-176.
19. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTOM). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:291-294. (Pubitemid 40288455)
20. Lopes P M L, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, Cavalcanti M G P. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105:224-230.
21. Muramatsu A, Nawa H, Kimura M. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:396-402.
22. Kimura M, Tokumori K, Nawa H. Reliability of a coordinate system based on anatomical landmarks of the maxillofacial skeleton: an evaluation method for 3-dimensional images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2009;25:37-42.