Laparoscopy entry in patients with previous abdominal and pelvic surgery

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 201-205

  Tinelli, Andrea ^a   Malvasi, Antonio ^b   Guido, Marcello ^c   Tsin, Daniel Alberto ^d   Hudelist, Gernot ^e   Stark, Michael ^f,g   Mettler, Liselotte ^h  

^a VITO FAZZI HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b Santa Maria Hospital   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e WILHELMINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^f New European Surgical Academy NESA   (Germany)

^g USP Hospital   (Spain)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

adhesions; blind closed access; complications; direct optical access; Hasson's method; laparoscopic entry; open laparoscopy; previous surgery; Veress needle

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; BLEEDING; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BODY MASS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT OPTICAL ENTRY; ECCHYMOSIS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE INJURY; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PATIENT SAFETY; PELVIS SURGERY; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SECOND LOOK SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PELVIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 80052465563     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350610393989     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Rafii A, Camatte S, Lelièvre L, Darai E, Lécuru F. Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy: a prospective study. BJOG. 2005 ; 112: 100-102 (Pubitemid 40095089)
2. van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis. 2007 ; 9: 25-34
3. Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg. 2006 ; 30: 535-540
4. Varma R, Gupta JK. Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medico legal ramifications. Surg Endosc. 2008 ; 22: 2686-2697
5. Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Schneider AJ, et al. First abdominal access in gynecological laparoscopy: which method to utilize? [in Italian]. Minerva Ginecol. 2006 ; 58: 429-440 (Pubitemid 44726989)
6. String A, Berber E, Foroutani A, Macho JR, Pearl JM, Siperstein AE. Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2001 ; 15: 570-573 (Pubitemid 32500122)
7. Tulikangas PK, Dian S, Robinson BS. Left upper quadrant cannula insertion. Fertil Steril. 2003 ; 79: 411-412 (Pubitemid 36144068)
8. Kumakiri J, Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kinoshita K. A novel method of 9th intercostals: microlaparoscopic approach for patients with previous laparotomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006 ; 85: 977-981 (Pubitemid 44114959)
9. Ahmad G, Duffy JMN, Phillips K, Watson A. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 ; (16). CD006583
10. Hasson HM, Rotman C, Rana N, Kumari NA. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 ; 96: 763-766
11. Kyung MS, Choi JS, Lee JH, Jung US, Lee KW. Laparoscopic management of complications in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a 5-year experience in a single center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 ; 15: 689-694
12. Levrant SG, Bieber E, Barnes R. Risk of anterior abdominal wall adhesions increases with number and type of previous laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 ; 1 (4 Pt 2). S19
13. Nezhat C, Cho J, Morozov V, Yeung P. Preoperative periumbilical ultrasound-guided saline infusion (PUGSI) as a tool in predicting obliterating subumbilical adhesions in laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 2009 ; 91: 2714-2719
14. Kumakiri J, Kikuchi I, Kitade M, et al. Incidence of complications during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in patients after previous laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 ; 17: 480-486
15. Lingam K, Cole RA. Laparoscopic entry port visited: a survey of practices of consultant gynaecologists in Scotland. Gynaecol Endosc. 2001 ; 10: 335-342 (Pubitemid 34062986)
16. Audebert AJ, Gomel V. Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil Steril. 2000 ; 73: 631-635 (Pubitemid 30109666)
17. Parker J, Reid G, Wong F. Microlaparoscopic left upper quadrant entry in patients at high risk of periumbilical adhesions. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 ; 39: 88-92 (Pubitemid 29108193)