Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA TM ) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal TM for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 270-276

  Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan ^a   Ali, Monaz Abdulrahman ^a  

^a MENOUFIA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic surgery; proseal lma; streamlined liner of the pharynx airway; supraglottic airway devices

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; MUSCLE RELAXANT AGENT; NITROUS OXIDE; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD REGURGITATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EPIGLOTTIS; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARYNGEAL MASK; LUNG MECHANICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARALYSIS; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; STOMACH DISTENSION; STREAMLINED LINER OF THE PHARYNX AIRWAY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 80052460377     PISSN: 1658354X     EISSN: 09753125     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.84100     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1351-3. (Pubitemid 33021047)
2. Akhtar TM, McMurray P, Kerr WJ, Kenny GN. A comparison of the anesthetic requirement for tolerance of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Anaesthesia 1992;47:668-71.
3. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an esophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:650-4. (Pubitemid 30229613)
4. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Lieper D, Fick GH. The LMA-ProSeal is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anesth 2002;49:857-62. (Pubitemid 35460488)
5. Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2003;58:136-42. (Pubitemid 36284741)
6. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:824-7. (Pubitemid 34618960)
7. Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantage of ProSealTM and SLIPATM airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:188-93.
8. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:286-7. (Pubitemid 29057634)
9. Cook TM, Cranshaw J. Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda during anesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:261-6. (Pubitemid 41487157)
10. Choi YM, Cha SM, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC, et al. The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPATM) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal TM during general anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010;58:450-7.
11. Jones MJ, Mitchell RW, Hindocha N. Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy on the lower esophageal sphincter. Anesth Analg 1989;68:63-5. (Pubitemid 19042933)
12. Brimacombe JR, Brain AIJ. The laryngeal Mask Airway. A review and Practical Guide. London: W.B. Saunders Company Ltd; 1996. p. 164-6.
13. Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Fick GH. Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs. tracheal intubation. Can J Anesth 2000;47:622-6. (Pubitemid 30658330)
14. Lange M, Smul T, Zimmermann P, Kohlenberger R, Roewer N, Kehl F. The effectiveness and patient comfort of the novel streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPATM) compared with the conventional laryngeal mask airway in ophthalmic surgery. Anesth Analg 2007;104:431-4. (Pubitemid 46146754)
15. Hein C, Owen H, Plummer J. Randomized comparison of the SLIPA (Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway) and SS-LM (Soft Seal Laryngeal Mask) by medical students. Emerg Med Australs 2006;18:478-83. (Pubitemid 44659345)
16. Puri GD, Hegde HV, Jayant A. Haemodynamic and Bispectral index response to insertion of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA): Comparison with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008;36:404-10.
17. Gaitini L, Yanovski B, Somri M, Vaida S, Riad T, Alfery D. A comparison between the PLA Cobra and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique during spontaneous ventilation: A randomized prospective study. Anesth Analg 2006;102:631-6. (Pubitemid 43152627)
18. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000;93:104-9. (Pubitemid 30436683)
19. Brimacombe JR, Berry A. The incidence of aspiration associated with the laryngeal mask airway: A Meta analysis of published literature. J Clin Anesth1995;7:297-305.
20. Brimacombe J, Clarke G, Keller C. Lingual nerve injury associated with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A case report and review of literature. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:420-3. (Pubitemid 41487359)
21. Bruce IA, Ellis R, Kay NJ. Nerve injury and laryngeal mask airway. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:899-901. (Pubitemid 39657153)
22. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agro F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002;96:289-95. (Pubitemid 34121735)
23. Lmb AB, Wrigley MW. The effect of nitrous oxide on laryngeal mask cuff pressure in vitro and in vivo studies. Anaesthesia 1992;47:320-3.
24. Lim HK, Lee CS, Song JH. The comparison of laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube in spontaneous breathing anesthetized pediatric patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2005;49:67-71.