Performance and clinical significance of direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on urine from hospitalized patients

Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 771-776

  Klein Breteler, Karlijn B ^a   Rentenaar, Rob J ^a   Verkaart, Gemma ^a   Sturm, Patrick D J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Direct susceptibility testing; Gram negative; Turnaround time; Urine

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ACINETOBACTER CALCOACETICUS; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; CITROBACTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISK DIFFUSION; ENTEROBACTER; EPSILOMETER TEST; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GRAM NEGATIVE INFECTION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INOCULATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KLEBSIELLA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MICROSCOPY; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; MORGANELLA MORGANII; PRESCRIPTION; PROTEUS MIRABILIS; PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA; URINALYSIS; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE CULTURE;

BETA-LACTAMASES; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAL INFECTIONS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;

EID: 80052428506     PISSN: 00365548     EISSN: 16511980     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2011.588609     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Wagenlehner FM, Pilatz A, Naber KG, Perletti G, Wagenleh-ner CM, Weidner W. Anti-infective treatment of bacterial urinary tract infections. Curr Med Chem 2008;15: 1412-27. (Pubitemid 351997792)
2. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infections. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:41-50. (Pubitemid 32619282)
3. MacDougall C, Polk RE. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in health care systems. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005;18:638-56. (Pubitemid 41504509)
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 10th ed. M02-A10. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2008.
5. Carroll KC, Glanz BD, Borek AP, Burger C, Bhally HS, Henciak S, Flayhart D. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:3506-9. (Pubitemid 46768775)
6. Menozzi MG, Eigner U, Covan S, Rossi S, Somenzi P, Dettori G, et al. Two-center collaborative evaluation of performance of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44: 4085-94. (Pubitemid 44737254)
7. Stefaniuk E, Baraniak A, Gniadkowsk M, Hryniewicz W. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated identification and susceptibility testing system in clinical microbiology laboratory practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;22: 479-85. (Pubitemid 37100595)
8. Hollick GE, Washington JA. Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976;9:804-9.
9. Johnson JR, Tiu FS, Stamm WE. Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing for acute urinary tract infections in women. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2316-23.
10. Oakes AR, Badge R, Grove DI. Comparison of direct and standardized testing of infected urine for antimicrobial susceptibilities by disk diffusion. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32: 40-5. (Pubitemid 24016779)
11. Wagenlehner FM, Weidner W, Naber KG. Emergence of antibiotic resistance amongst hospital-acquired urinary tract infections and pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic considerations. J Hosp Infect 2005;60:191-200. (Pubitemid 40790456)