Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 3506-3509

  Carroll, Karen C ^a,b   Glanz, Brian D ^a   Borek, Anita P ^a   Burger, Chad ^a   Bhally, Hasan S ^a   Henciak, Susan ^a   Flayhart, Diane ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; INOCULATION; MICROBIAL IDENTIFICATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHIGELLA; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; AUTOMATION; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECT; INSTRUMENTATION;

ENTEROBACTER; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; KLEBSIELLA; PANTOEA; SHIGELLA;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; AUTOMATION; BACTERIAL TYPING TECHNIQUES; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE;

EID: 34248676562     PISSN: 00951137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00994-06     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Donay, J.-L., D. Mathieu, P. Fernandes, C. Pregermain, P. Bruel, A. Wargnier, I. Casin, F. X. Weill, P. H. Lagrange, and J. L. Herrmann. 2004. Evaluation of the automated Phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1542-1546.
2. Eigner, U., A. Schmid, U. Wild, D. Bertsch, and A.-M. Fahr. 2005. Analysis of the comparative workflow and performance characteristics of the VITEK 2 and Phoenix systems. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:3829-3834.
3. Farmer, J. J., III. 2003. Enterobacteriaceae: introduction and identification, p. 636-653. In P. R. Murray E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
4. Leverstein-van Hall, M. A., A. C. Fluit, A. Paauw, A. T. A. Box, S. Brisse, and J. Verhoef. 2002. Evaluation of the E-test ESBL and the BD Phoenix, VITEK 1, and VITEK 2 automated instruments for detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in multiresistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:3703-3711.
5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2004. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; fourteenth informational supplement. M100-S14. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
6. O'Hara, C. M. 2006. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:928-933.
7. Sanguinetti, M., B. Posteraro, T. Spanu, D. Ciccaglione, L. Romano, B. Fiori, G. Nicoletti, S. Zanetti, and G. Fadda. 2003. Characterization of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from Italy by the BD Phoenix extended-spectrum β-lactamase detection method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1463-1468.
8. Stefaniuk, E., A. Baraniak, M. Gniadkowski, and W. Hryniewicz. 2003. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated identification and susceptibility testing system in clinical microbiology laboratory practice. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:479-485.
9. Sturenburg, E., I. Sobottka, H.-H. Feucht, D. Mack, and R. Laufs. 2003. Comparison of BDPhoenix and VITEK2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility test systems for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase detection in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species clinical isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 45:29-34.