Performance of modified anatomic plates is comparable to proximal femoral nail, dynamic hip screw and anatomic plates: Finite element and biomechanical testing

Injury

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1077-1083

  Oken, O Fuad ^a   Soydan, Zafer ^a   Yildirim, A Ozgur ^a   Gulcek, Murat ^a   Ozlu, Korhan ^a   Ucaner, Ahmet ^a  

^a ANKARA TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anatomic plate; Biomechanical tests; Dynamic hip screw; Finite element methods; Intertrochanteric femur fractures; Proximal femoral nails

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMIC PLATE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; FEMUR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE; HUMAN; INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MODIFIED ANATOMIC PLATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HUMANS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 80052419907     PISSN: 00201383     EISSN: 18790267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ASTM F1541-02 Standard specification and test methods for external skeletal fixation devices. annual book of astm standards 13.01 2002
2. F. Bachtar, X. Chen, and T. Hisada Finite element contact analysis of the hip joint Med Biol Eng Comput 44 8 2006 643 651 (Pubitemid 44203435)
3. G. Bergmann, F. Graichen, and A. Rohlmann Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients J Biomech 26 1993 969 990 (Pubitemid 23220211)
4. G. Bergmann, G. Deuretzbacher, and M. Heller Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities J Biomech 34 2001 859 871 (Pubitemid 32530054)
5. T. Bodzay, T. Burján, and C. Bagdi Evaluation of stabilization methods of pelvic ring injuries by finite element modeling Joint Dis Rel Surg 18 2007 108 115
6. J. Cegonino, J.M.G. Aznar, and M. Doblare A comparative analysis of different for distal femur fractures using the finite element method Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 7 2004 245 256
7. F.H. Dar, J.R. Meakin, and R.M. Aspden Statistical methods in finite element analysis J Biomech 35 2002 1155 1161 (Pubitemid 34879735)
8. C.M. Ford, T.M. Keaveny, and W.C. Hayes The effect of impact direction on the structural capacity of the proximal femur during falls J Bone Miner Res 11 1996 377 383 (Pubitemid 26076387)
9. R. Ganz, R.J. Thomas, and C.P. Hammerle Trochanteric fractures of the femur, treatment and results Clin Orthop Relat Res 138 1979 30 40 (Pubitemid 9199081)
10. Y. Gotfried, E. Frish, and D.G. Mendes ntertrochanteric fractures in high risk geriatric patients treated by external fixation Orthopedics 6 1985 769 774 (Pubitemid 15073313)
11. P. Helwig, G. Faust, and U. Hindenlang Finite element analysis of a bone-implant system with the proximal femur nail Technol Health Care 14 2006 411 419 (Pubitemid 44610735)
12. R. Huiskes, and E.Y.S. Chao A survey of finite element analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics: the first decade J Biomech 16 1983 385 409 [Review] (Pubitemid 13014399)
13. H. Kaufer Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries Clin Orthop Relat Res 146 1980 53 61 (Pubitemid 10139018)
14. J.H. Keyak Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models Med Eng Phys 23 2001 165 173 (Pubitemid 32532058)
15. J.H. Keyak, S.A. Rossi, and K.A. Jones Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models Med Eng Phys 23 2001 657 664 (Pubitemid 34072903)
16. J.H. Keyak, H.B. Skinner, and J.A. Fleming Effect of force direction on femoral fracture load for two types of loading conditions J Orthop Res 19 2001 539 544 (Pubitemid 32700964)
17. J.H. Keyak, and Y. Falkinstein Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load Med Eng Phys 25 2003 781 787 (Pubitemid 39089844)
18. C. Kinast, B.R. Bolhofner, and J.W. Mast Subtrochanteric fractures of the Femur. Results of treatment with 95 angle condylar blade plate Clin. Orthop Relat Res 238 1989 122 130 (Pubitemid 19044791)
19. J.C. Lotz, E.J. Cheal, and W.C. Hayes Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: part I - linear analysis J Biomech Eng 113 1991 353 360
20. J.C. Lotz, E.J. Cheal, and W.C. Hayes Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: part II - nonlinear analysis J Biomech Eng 113 1991 361 365
21. J.C. Lotz, E.J. Cheal, and W.C. Hayes Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture Osteopor Int 5 1995 252 261
22. S. Majumder, A. Roychowdhury, and S. Pal Simulation of hip fracture in sideways fall using a 3D finite element model of pelvis-femur-soft tissue complex with simplified representation of whole body Med Eng Phys 29 2007 1167 1178 (Pubitemid 350052625)
23. A. Moroni, C. Faldini, and F. Pegreffi Dynamic hip screw compared with external fixation for treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures J Bone Joint Surg 87 2005 753 759 (Pubitemid 40489350)
24. Z.M. Oden, D.M. Selvitelli, and M.L. Bouxsein Effect of local density changes on the failure load of the proximal femur J Orthop Res 17 1999 661 667
25. O.F. Oken, M. Gulcek, and A.O. Yildirim The usage of femur proximal anatomic plate in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 41 Suppl. III 2007 36
26. H. Palm, S. Jacobsen, and S. Sonne-Holm Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 2007 470 475 (Pubitemid 46365346)
27. E.F. Rybicki, F.A. Simonen, and E.B. Weis On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur J Biomech 5 1972 203 215
28. E. Schileo, F. Taddei, and Malandrino Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones J Biomech 40 2007 2982 2989 (Pubitemid 47385813)
29. M. Schmid Daners, L. Wullschleger, and S. Derler Development of a new design of hip protectors using finite element analysis and mechanical tests Med Eng Phys 30 2008 1186 1192
30. B. Seral, J.M. Garcia, and J. Cegonino Finite element study of intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: gamma and PFN Injury 35 2004 130 135 (Pubitemid 38084889)
31. K.S. Shih, C.S. Tseng, and C.C. Lee Influence of muscular contractions on the stress analysis of distal femoral interlocking nailing Clin Biomech 23 2008 38 44
32. K. Sitthiseripratip, H. Van Oosterwyck, and J. Vander Sloten Finite element study of trochanteric gamma nail for trochanteric fracture Med Eng Phys 25 2003 99 106 (Pubitemid 36106500)
33. S. Sowmianarayanan, A. Chandrasekaran, and R.K. Kumar Finite element analysis of a subtrochanteric fractured femur with dynamic hip screw, dynamic condylar screw, and proximal femur nail implants - a comparative study Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 222 2008 117 127 (Pubitemid 351593649)
34. M. Viceconti, S. Olsen, and L.P. Nolte Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations Clin Biomech 20 2005 451 454
35. N. Verdonschot, and R. Huiskes Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 1997 665 669
36. D. William, and Callister Jr. Materials science and engineering an introduction 5th ed. 2000 John Wiley & Sons Denver, USA p. 793
37. D.C. Wirtz, N. Schiffers, and T. Pandorf Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur J Biomech 33 2000 1325 1330 (Pubitemid 30427330)