Some issues on detecting negation from text

Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, FLAIRS - 24

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 228-233

  Blanco, Eduardo ^a   Moldovan, Dan ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN LANGUAGE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 80052418524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bos, J., and Markert, K. 2005. Recognising Textual Entailment with Logical Inference. In Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP conference.
2. Councill, I.; McDonald, R.; and Velikovich, L. 2010. What's Great and What's Not: Learning to Classify the Scope of Negation for Improved Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the NeSp-NLP Workshop.
3. Dowty, D. 1994. The Role of Negative Polarity and Concord Marking in Natural Language Reasoning. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory (SALT) 4.
4. Farkas, R.; Vincze, V.; Móra, G.; Csirik, J.; and Szarvas, G. 2010. The CoNLL-2010 Shared Task: Learning to Detect Hedges and their Scope in Natural Language Text.
5. Hintikka, J. 2002. Negation in Logic and in Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5/6).
6. Horn, L. R., and Kato, Y., eds. 2000. Negation and Polarity - Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford University Press, USA.
7. Horn, L. R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. University Of Chicago Press.
8. Huddleston, R. D., and Pullum, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
9. Morante, R., and Daelemans, W. 2009. Learning the Scope of Hedge Cues in Biomedical Texts. In Proceedings of the BioNLP 2009 Workshop.
10. Morante, R., and Sporleder, C., eds. 2010. Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing.
11. Özgür, A., and Radev, D. R. 2009. Detecting Speculations and their Scopes in Scientific Text. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
12. Palmer, M.; Gildea, D.; and Kingsbury, P. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 31(1):71-106.
13. Rose, C. P.; Roque, A.; Bhembe, D.; and Vanlehn, K. 2003. A Hybrid Text Classification Approach for Analysis of Student Essays. In Building Educational Applications Using NLP.
14. Sánchez Valencia, V. 1991. Studies on Natural Logic and Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
15. Saurí, R., and Pustejovsky, J. 2009. FactBank: a corpus annotated with event factuality. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3):227-268-268.
16. van Munster, E. 1988. The treatment of Scope and Negation in Rosetta. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.
17. Vincze, V.; Szarvas, G.; Farkas, R.; Mora, G.; and Csirik, J. 2008. The BioScope corpus: biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinformatics 9(Suppl 11).
18. Wiegand, M.; Balahur, A.; Roth, B.; Klakow, D.; and Montoyo, A. 2010. A Survey on the Role of Negation in Sentiment Analysis. In Proceedings of the NeSp-NLP Workshop.
19. Wilson, T.; Wiebe, J.; and Hoffmann, P. 2009. Recognizing contextual polarity: An exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics 35(3):399-433.
20. Zeijlstra, H. 2007. Negation in Natural Language: On the Form and Meaning of Negative Elements. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5):498-518.