Learning the scope of hedge cues in biomedical texts

BioNLP 2009 - Biomedical Natural Language Processing Workshop, BioNLP 2009 - held in conjunction with 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2009 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 28-36

  Morante, Roser ^a   Daelemans, Walter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE; BIOMEDICAL TEXT; BIOSCOPES; FACTUAL INFORMATION; MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS; SUBTASK;

WOODEN FENCES;

EID: 78650207232     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of the X CoNLL Shared Task, New York. SIGNLL.
2. N. Collier, H.S. Park, N. Ogata, Y. Tateisi, C. Nobata, T. Sekimizu, H. Imai, and J. Tsujii. 1999. The GENIA project: Corpus-based knowledge acquisition and information extraction from genome research papers. In Proc. of EACL 1999.
3. T. M. Cover and P. E. Hart. 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Information Theory, 13:21-27.
4. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2007. TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 6.1, reference guide. Technical Report Series 07-07, ILK, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
5. C. Di Marco and R.E. Mercer, 2005. Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications, chapter Hedging in scientific articles as a means of classifying citations. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht.
6. C. Friedman, P. Alderson, J. Austin, J.J. Cimino, and S.B. Johnson. 1994. A general natural-language text processor for clinical radiology. JAMIA, 1(2):161-174.
7. K. Hyland. 1998. Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins B.V, Amsterdam.
8. T. Joachims, 1999. Advances in Kernel Methods -Support Vector Learning, chapter Making large-Scale SVM Learning Practical, pages 169-184. MIT-Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. H. Kilicoglu and S. Bergler. 2008. Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: A linguistically motivated perspective. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(Suppl 11):S10.
10. M. Krallinger, F. Leitner, C. Rodriguez-Penagos, and A. Valencia. 2008a. Overview of the protein-protein interaction annotation extraction task of BioCreative II. Genome Biology, 9(Suppl 2):S4.
11. M. Krallinger, A. Valencia, and L. Hirschman. 2008b. Linking genes to literature: Text mining, information extraction, and retrieval applications for biology. Genome Biology, 9(Suppl 2):S8.
12. M. Krauthammer, P. Kra, I. Iossifov, S.M. Gomez, G. Hripcsak, V. Hatzivassiloglou, C. Friedman, and A.Rzhetsky. 2002. Of truth and pathways: Chasing bits of information through myriads of articles. Bioinformatics, 18(Suppl 1):S249-57.
13. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. of ICML 2001, pages 282-289.
14. G. Lakoff. 1972. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistics Society Papers, 8:183-228.
15. M. Light, X.Y.Qiu, and P. Srinivasan. 2004. The language of bioscience: Facts, speculations, and statements in between. In Proc. of the BioLINK 2004, pages 17-24.
16. B. Medlock and T. Briscoe. 2007. Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. In Proc. of ACL 2007, pages 992-999.
17. B. Medlock. 2008. Exploring hedge identification in biomedical literature. JBI, 41:636-654.
18. T. Mitsumori, M. Murata, Y. Fukuda, K Doi, and H. Doi. 2006. Extracting protein-protein interaction information from biomedical text with svm. IEICE - Trans. Inf. Syst., E89-D(8):2464-2466.
19. R. Morante and W. Daelemans. 2009. A metalearning approach to processing the scope of negation. In Proc. of CoNLL 2009, Boulder, Colorado.
20. F.R. Palmer. 1986. Mood and modality. CUP, Cambridge, UK.
21. R. Saurí, M. Verhagen, and J. Pustejovsky. 2006. Annotating and recognizing event modality in text. In Proc. of FLAIRS 2006, pages 333-339.
22. G. Szarvas, V. Vincze, R. Farkas, and J. Csirik. 2008. The BioScope corpus: Annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts. In Proc. of BioNLP 2008, pages 38-45, Columbus, Ohio. ACL.
23. G. Szarvas. 2008. Hedge classification in biomedical texts with a weakly supervised selection of keywords. In Proc. of ACL 2008, pages 281-289, Columbus, Ohio, USA. ACL.
24. P. Thompson, G. Venturi, J. McNaught, S. Montemagni, and S. Ananiadou. 2008. Categorising modality in biomedical texts. In Proc. of the LREC 2008Workshop on Building and Evaluating Resources for Biomedical Text Mining 2008, pages 27-34, Marrakech. LREC.
25. Y. Tsuruoka and J. Tsujii. 2005. Bidirectional inference with the easiest-first strategy for tagging sequence data. In Proc. of HLT/EMNLP 2005, pages 467-474.
26. Y. Tsuruoka, Y. Tateishi, J. Kim, T. Ohta, J. McNaught, S. Ananiadou, and J. Tsujii, 2005. Advances in Informatics - 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, volume 3746 of LNCS, chapter Part-of-Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text, Advances in Informatics, pages 382-392. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
27. C.J. Van Rijsbergen. 1979. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London.
28. V. Vincze, G. Szarvas, R. Farkas, G. Móra, and J. Csirik. 2008. The BioScope corpus: Biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(Suppl 11):S9.