Criteria for the Design and Evaluation of Cognitive Architectures

Cognitive Science

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1329-1351

  Varma, Sashank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Cognitive architecture; Computer simulation; Neural networks; Philosophy of computation; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Symbolic computational modeling

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; THINKING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); THINKING;

EID: 80052415025     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01190.x     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Agre, P. E. (1993). Interview with Allen Newell. Artificial Intelligence, 59, 415-449.
2. Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39-83.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur the physical universe? Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston & Sons.
9. Anderson, J. R., & Douglas, S. (2001). Tower of Hanoi: Evidence for the cost of goal retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1331-1346.
10. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.) (1998). Talking nets: An oral history of neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
13. Bobrow, D. G., & Collins, A. (Eds.) (1975). Representation and understanding: Studies cognitive science. New York: Academic Press.
14. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717-726.
15. Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.
16. Byrne, M. D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Serial modules parallel: The psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. Psychological Review, 108, 847-869.
17. Caplan, D., Baker, C., & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117-175.
18. Carley, K., & Wendt, K. (1988). Electronic mail and scientific communication: A study of the Soar extended research group. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 12, 406-440.
19. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
20. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
21. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
22. Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing what. Science, 210, 207-210.
23. Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.
24. Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. (2004). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780.
26. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.
27. Elman, J., Bates, E., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Johnson, M., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: Development a connectionist perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Englemore, R., & Morgan, T. (Eds.) (1988). Blackboard systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Erman, L. D., Hayes-Roth, F., Lesser, V. R., & Reddy, D. R. (1980). The Hearsay-II speech understanding system: Integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty. ACM Computing Surveys, 12, 213-253.
31. Fix, J., Vitay, J., & Rougier, N. (2007). A distributed computational model of spatial memory anticipation during a visual search task. M. V. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Baldassarre, & G. Pezzulo (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior adaptive learning systems: From brains to individual and social behavior LNAI 4520 (pp. 170-188). Berlin: Springer.
32. Forgy, C. L. (1982). Rete: A fast algorithm for the many patterns/many objects match problem. Artificial Intelligence, 19, 17-37.
33. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34. Goldman, S. R., & Varma, S. (1995). CAPping the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. C. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 337-358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Goodman, N. (1968). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
36. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hinton, G. E. (1990). Mapping part-whole hierarchies into connectionist networks. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 47-75.
38. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed computing: Explorations the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1986). Learning and relearning Boltzmann machines. D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed computing: Explorations the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 282-317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). Schema abstraction a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
41. Howes, A., & Young, R. M. (1997). The role of cognitive architecture modeling the user: Soar's learning mechanism. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 311-343.
42. Jones, R. M., Lebiere, C., & Crossman, J. A. (2007). Comparing modeling idioms ACT-R and Soar. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 49-54). Ann Arbor, MI.
43. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2008). Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, speech recognition, and computational linguistics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
45. Just, M. A., & Varma, S. (2002). A hybrid architecture for working memory. Psychological Review, 109, 54-64.
46. Just, M. A., & Varma, S. (2007). The organization of thinking: What functional braimaging reveals about the neuroarchitecture of cognition. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 153-191.
47. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
48. Kintsch, W., & Welsch, D. M. (1991). The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory (pp. 367-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
50. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Selected studies scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
52. Laird, J. E. (2008). Extending the Soar cognitive architecture. P. Wang, B. Goertzel, & S. Frankl(Eds.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (pp. 224-235). Memphis, TN.
53. Laird, J. E., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1992, Winter). The research of Allen Newell. AI Magazine, 13, 17-45.
54. Laird, J. E., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1996). The evolution of the Soar cognitive architecture. D. M. Steier & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Mind matters: A tribute to Allen Newell (pp. 1-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Lewis, R. L. (1993). An architecturally-based theory of human sentence comprehension. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
56. Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29, 375-419.
57. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
58. Lovett, M. C. (2005). A strategy-based interpretation of Stroop. Cognitive Science, 29, 493-524.
59. Lowerre, B., & Reddy, D. R. (1980). The HARPY speech understanding system. W. Lea (Ed.), Trends speech recognition (pp. 576-586). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
60. Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. (Eds.) (1963). Handbook of mathematical psychology (Volumes I-III). New York: Wiley.
61. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
62. Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175.
63. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and presentation of visual information. New York: W. H. Freeman.
64. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
65. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Explorations parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. McCorduck, P. A. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
67. McCracken, D. L. (1978). A production system version of the Hearsay-II speech understanding system. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
68. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
69. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
70. Miller, C. S., & Laird, J. E. (1996). Accounting for graded performance witha discrete search framework. Cognitive Science, 20, 499-537.
71. Mitroff, I. I. (1974). Norms and counter-norms a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review, 38, 579-595.
72. Mozer, M., Smolensky, P., Touretzky, D., Elman, J., & Weigand, A. (Eds.) (1994). Proceedings of the 1993 connectionist models summer school. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Neurath, O., Carnap, R., & Morris, C. (Eds.) (1955). Foundations of the unity of science, volume 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74. Newell, A. (1973a). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-308). New York: Academic Press.
75. Newell, A. (1973b). Production systems: Models of control structures. W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 463-526). New York: Academic Press.
76. Newell, A. (1980). Harpy, production systems, and human cognition. R. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 289-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
77. Newell, A. (1989). Putting it all together. D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A (pp. 399-440). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1961). Computer simulation of human thinking. Science, 134, 2011-2017.
80. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
81. Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104-114.
82. Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. H. Feigl, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies the philosophy of science, volume II: Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (pp. 3-36). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
83. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
85. Pollack, J. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 36, 77-105.
86. Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
87. Post, E. L. (1943). Formal reductions of the general combinatorial decision problem. American Journal of Mathematics, 65, 197-215.
88. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
91. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed computing: Explorations the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 45-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533-536.
93. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
94. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). PDP models and general issues cognitive science. D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed computing: Explorations the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 110-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Shastri, L., & Ajjanagadde, V. (1993). From simple associations so systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables, and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioral and BraSciences, 16, 417-494.
96. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. Simon, H. A. (1998). Allen Newell: 1927-1992. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 20, 63-76.
98. Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures connectionist networks. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159-216.
99. Stanfill, C., & Waltz, D. (1986). Toward memory-based reasoning. Communications of the ACM, 29, 1213-1228.
100. Taatgen, N. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). The past, present, and future of cognitive architectures. Topics Cognitive Science, 2, 693-704.
101. Touretzky, D. S., & Hinton, G. E. (1988). A distributed connectionist production system. Cognitive Science, 12, 423-466.
102. Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs. B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials performance and cognition (pp. 133-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
103. Von Restorff, H. (1933). Uber die wirkung von bereichsbildungen im spurenfeld [The effects of field formation the trace field]. Psychologie Forschung, 18, 299-334.
104. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-853.
105. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
106. Young, R. M., & Lewis, R. L. (1999). The Soar cognitive architecture and human working memory. A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 224-256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.