The hierarchy of detective fiction: A gramulator analysis

Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, FLAIRS - 24

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 257-262

  Lamkin, Travis A ^a   McCarthy, Philip M ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; HIERARCHICAL RELATIONS; LEXICAL FEATURES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 80052406919     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bhatia, V.K. 1997. Applied genre analysis and ESP. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications. Washington, DC: USIA.
2. Bhatia, V.K. 2002. Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica, 4: 3-19.
3. Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
4. Biber, D. 1989. A Typology of English Texts, Linguistics, 27: 3-43.
5. Chandler, R. 1985. The Simple Art of Murder. In H. Haycraft Ed., The Art ofthe Mystery Story. New York, NY: Carrol.
6. Crossley, S.A., Louwerse, M., and McNamara, D.S. 2009. Identifying linguistic cues that distinguish text types: A comparison of first and second language speakers. Language Research, 42, 361-381.
7. Davies, A. and C. Elder eds. 2004. The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Graesser, A., Olde, B., and Klettke, B. 2002. How does the mind construct and represent stories. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, and T.C. Brock Eds., Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Henry, A. and Roseberry, R. L. 2001. Using a small corpus to obtain data for teaching a genre. Small corpus studies and ELT: theory and practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Herring, S. and Paolillo, J. C. 2006. Gender and genre variations in weblogs. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 10: 439-459.
11. Holquist, M. 1971. Whodunit and Other Questions: Metaphysical Detective Stories in Post-War Fiction. New Literary History. 3: 135-156.
12. Hopkins, A. and Dudley-Evans, A. 1988. A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes. 7: 113-122.
13. Jamieson, K. M. 1975. Antecedent Genre as Rhetorical Constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 406-415.
14. Karlsgren J. and Cutting, D. 1994. Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. International Conference on Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics. Kyoto: 1071-1075.
15. Malmgren, C. D. 1999. The Crime of the Sign: Dashiell Hammett's Detective Fiction. Twentieth Century Literature. 45: 371-384.
16. McCarthy, P. M. 2010. Special Presentation of the Gramulator. Presented at the South-eastern Conference on Linguistics.
17. McCarthy, P. M. 2010. GPAT paper: A Genre Purity Assessment Tool. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 247-252. Menlo Park, CA: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.
18. McCarthy, P.M., Myers, J.C., Briner, S.W., Graesser, A.C., and McNamara, D.S. 2009. Are three words all we need? A psychological and computational study of genre recognition. Journal for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology.
19. McCarthy, P.M., Watanabe S., and Lamkin, T.A. in press. The Gramulator: A tool for the identification of indicative linguistic features. In P.M. McCarthy and C. Boonthum Eds. Applied natural language processing and content analysis: Identification, investigation, and resolution. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
20. McManis, Douglas R. 1978. Places for Mysteries. Geographical Review. 68: 319-334.
21. Meyer zu Eissen, S. and Stein, B. 2004. Genre classification of web pages.KI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. 3238: 256-269.
22. Min, H.C. and McCarthy, P. M. 2010. Identifying Varietals in the Discourse of American and Korean Scientists: A Contrastive Corpus Analysis Using the Gramulator. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. 247-252. Menlo Park, CA: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.
23. Palmer, J. 2001. Tracing Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Forensic Detective Fiction. South Central Review. 18,:54-71
24. Priestman, M. 2003. Cambridge Companion to Crime Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Rahati, A., & Kabanza, F. (2010). Persuasive dialogues in an intelligent tutoring system for medical diagnosis. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems International Conference. 51-61. Berlin: Springer.
26. Rehm, G. 2002. Towards Automatic Web Genre Identification. Proc. of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
27. Rzepka, C.J. 2005. Detective Fiction. Malden, MA: Polity.
28. Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Thomas R.R. 2005. Detective Fiction and the Rise of Forensic Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
30. Upton, T., and Connor, U. 2001. Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes: An International Journal. 20: 313-329. (Pubitemid 33647284)
31. Zwaan, R.A., Langston, M.C., and Graesser, A.C. 1995. The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension. Psychological Science. 6: 292-297.