Persuasive dialogues in an intelligent tutoring system for medical diagnosis

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6095 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2010, Pages 51-61

  Rahati, Amin ^a   Kabanza, Froduald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

argumentation; intelligent tutoring system; medical diagnosis; persuasive dialogue

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; EXPERT MODEL; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS; PERSUASIVE DIALOGUES; TUTORING DIALOGUES; TUTORING SYSTEM;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 77955862117     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Kabanza, F., Bisson, G., Charneau, A., Jang, T.S.: Implementing tutoring strategies into a patient simulator for clinical reasoning learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence In Medicine (AIIM) 38, 79-96 (2006)
2. Zhou, Y., Freedman, R., Glass, M., Michael, J.A., Rovick, A.A., Evens, M.W.: Delivering hints in a dialogue-based intelligent tutoring system. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1999)
3. Freedman, R.: Plan-based dialogue management in a physics tutor. In: Proceedings of the 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, Seattle (2000)
4. Zinn, C., Moore, J.D., Core, M.G.: A 3-tier planning architecture for managing tutorial dialogue. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 574-584. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
5. Nguyen, H.: Designing persuasive health behaviour change dialogs. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on User Modeling, pp. 475-479 (2007)
6. Andrews, P., De Boni, M., Manandhar, S.: Persuasive argumentation in human computer dialogue. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2006 Spring Symposia (2006)
7. Guerini, M., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M.: Persuasion models for intelligent interfaces. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (2003)
8. Walton, D.N.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erbaum, Mahwah (1996)
9. Prakken, H.: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 21(2), 163-188 (2006)
10. Ashley, K., Pinkwart, N., Lynch, C., Aleven, V.: Learning by diagramming supreme court oral arguments. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 271-275 (2007)
11. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
12. Moore, D.: Dialogue game theory for intelligent tutoring systems. Ph.d. dissertation, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, UK (1993)
13. Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R., Noriega, P., Parsons, S.: A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Agent Theories Architectures and Languages, pp. 167-182 (1998)
14. Mackenzie, J.D.: Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 117-133 (1979)
15. Kibble, R.: Reasoning about propositional commitments in dialogue. Research on Language and Computation 4(2-3), 179-202 (2006)
16. Walton, D.: Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto Press (1996b)
17. Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8(3), 231-274 (1987)
18. Drusinsky, D.: Modeling and Verification Using UML Statecharts. In: A Working Guide to Reactive System Design, RuntimeMonitoring and Execution-basedModel Checking, 1st edn., Newnes (2006)
19. Dung., P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-358 (1995)
20. Chamberland, M., Hivon, R., Tardif, J., Bédard, D.: Évolution du raisonnement clinique au cours d'un stage d'externat: une etude exploratoire. Pédagogie Médicale 2, 9-17 (2001)
21. Prakken, H.: Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese 127, 187-219 (2001)
22. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N.: Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report). In: Proceeding of 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Special session on Argument, Dialogue, and Decision, pp. 399-407 (2002)