Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of biliopancreatic abnormalities

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 156-160

  Sotoudehmanesh, Rasoul ^a   Khatibian, Morteza ^a   Ghadir, Mohammad Reza ^b   Bagheri, Mohammad ^a   Hashemi Taheri, Amir Pejman ^c   Sedighi, Nahid ^c   Ali Asgari, Ali ^a   Zeinali, Fatemeh ^a   Shahraeeni, Shadi ^a   Kolahdoozan, Shadi ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b QOM UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cholangiopancreatography; Pancreatobiliary neoplasms; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT STONE; BILIARY STENTING; BILIARY TRACT BIOPSY; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS BIOPSY; PANCREAS DISEASE; PERIAMPULLARY CANCER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENT;

ADULT; AGED; BILIARY TRACT NEOPLASMS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80052402697     PISSN: 02548860     EISSN: 09750711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-011-0120-x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Lapis JL, Orlando RC, Mittelstaedt CA, Staab EV. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of obstructive jaundice. Ann Intern Med. 1978; 89: 61-3.
2. Pasanen PA, Partanen KP, Pikkarainen PH, Alhava EM, Janatuinen EK, Pirinen AE. A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis. Eur J Surg. 1993; 159: 23-9.
3. Pedersen OM, Nordgard K, Kvinnsland S. Value of sonography in obstructive jaundice. Limitations of bile duct caliber as an index of obstruction. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987; 22: 975-81.
4. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10, 000 cases. Gastroenterology. 1976; 70: 314-20.
5. Ho S. Risks of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Techn Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 10: 22-4.
6. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1997; 205: 523-30.
7. Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW, et al. Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology. 1996; 200: 85-9.
8. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology. 1998; 207: 21-32.
9. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology. 1995; 197: 109-15.
10. Lee MG, Lee HJ, Kim MH, et al. Extrahepatic biliary diseases: 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 1997; 202: 663-9.
11. Lomanto D, Pavone P, Laghi A, et al. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Am J Surg. 1997; 174: 33-8.
12. Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin Radiol. 1999; 54: 513-20.
13. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol. 2000; 55: 25-35.
14. Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165: 295-300.
15. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96: 2900-4.
16. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut. 1999; 44: 118-22.
17. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139: 547-57.
18. Amouyal P, Amouyal G, Levy P, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1994; 106: 1062-7.
19. Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa D, Zambelli A, Buscarini L. EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 510-8.
20. Kohut M, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek T, Kaczor R, Nowak A. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2002; 34: 299-303.
21. Norton SA, Alderson D. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection of bile duct stones. Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 1366-9.
22. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 45: 261-7.
23. Frossard JL, Hadengue A, Amouyal G, et al. Choledocholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51: 175-9.
24. Sotoudehmanesh R, Kolahdoozan S, Asgari AA, Dooghaei-Moghaddam M, Ainechi S. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in prevention of unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective study of 150 patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 455-60.
25. Cannon ME, Carpenter SL, Elta GH, et al. EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50: 27-33.
26. Ly JN, Miller FH. MR imaging of the pancreas: a practical approach. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002; 40: 1289-306.
27. McMahon CJ. The relative roles of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of common bile duct calculi: a critically appraised topic. Abdom Imaging. 2008; 33: 6-9.
28. Gress F, Savides T, Cummings O, et al. Radial scanning and linear array endosonography for staging pancreatic cancer: a prospective randomized comparison. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 45: 138-42.
29. Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, et al. Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 50: 786-91.
30. Midwinter MJ, Beveridge CJ, Wilsdon JB, Bennett MK, Baudouin CJ, Charnley RM. Correlation between spiral computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 189-93.
31. Mukai H, Yasuda K, Nakajima M. Tumors of the papilla and distal common bile duct. Diagnosis and staging by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995; 5: 763-72.
32. Muller MF, Meyenberger C, Bertschinger P, Schaer R, Marincek B. Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1994; 190: 745-51.
33. Quirk DM, Rattner DW, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Brugge WR. The use of endoscopic ultrasonography to reduce the cost of treating ampullary tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 46: 334-7.
34. Rosch T, Braig C, Gain T, et al. Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography. Gastroenterology. 1992; 102: 188-99.
35. Tio TL, Sie LH, Kallimanis G, et al. Staging of ampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: comparison between endosonography and surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44: 706-13.
36. Devonshire D, Sahai A, Yeoh K, et al. Is MRI/MRCP worthwhile when ERCP is planned? A prospective trial in a referral center [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 47: AB28.