Filtration performances of a novel submerged nonwoven filter for particle separation

Desalination

Volumn 279, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 163-169

  Chuang, Shun Hsing ^a   Chang, Wei Chin ^b   Chang, Min Chao ^c   Hu, Kuo Liang ^a  

^a CHAOYANG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Aeration intensity; Filtration; Nonwovens; Particle separation; Transnonwoven pressure

Indexed keywords

AERATION INTENSITY; CAKE LAYER; CAKE LAYER FORMATION; DIFFERENT SIZES; EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE; FILTRATION PERFORMANCE; FLUX REDUCTION; HIGH EFFICIENCY; HYDRODYNAMIC EFFECT; NONWOVEN FILTER; NONWOVENS; PARTICLE SEPARATION; SMALL PARTICLES; SPECIFIC PERMEABILITY; SUSPENDED SOLIDS; TIO; TRANSNONWOVEN PRESSURE;

PARTICLE SEPARATORS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WEAVING;

NONWOVEN FABRICS;

FILTER; FILTRATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE EFFECT; SEPARATION;

EID: 80052378399     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Irwin M. Hutten 2007, Handbook of nonwoven filter media, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
2. Judd S. The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends in Biotechnol. 2008, 26(2):109-116.
3. Yang W., Cicek N., Ilg J. State-of-the-art of membrane bioreactors: worldwide research and commercial applications in North America. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 270(1-2):201-211.
4. Chang I.S., Gander M., Jefferson B., Judd S. Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., Part B 2001, 79:183-188.
5. Verrecht B., Maere T., Nopens I., Brepols C., Judd S. The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR. Water Res. 2010, 44(18):5274-5283.
6. Gil J.A., Túa L., Rueda A., Montaño B., Rodríguez M., Prats D. Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR. Desalination 2010, 250(3):997-1001.
7. Wang C.C., Yang F.L., Liu L.F., Fu Z.M., Xue Y. Hydrophilic and antibacterial properties of polyvinyl alcohol/4-vinylpyridine graft polymer modified polypropylene non-woven fabric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345(1-2):223-232.
8. Meng Z.G., Yang F.L., Zhang X.W. MBR focus: do nonwovens offer a cheaper option?. Filtr. Sep. 2005, 42(5):28-30.
9. Chang M.C., Horng R.Y., Shao H., Hu Y.J. Performance and filtration characteristics of non-woven membranes used in a submerged membrane bioreactor for synthetic wastewater treatment. Desalination 2006, 191(1-3):8-15.
10. Horng R.Y., Shao H., Chang W.K., Chang M.C. The feasibility study of using non-woven MBR for reduction of hydrolysed biosolids. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(5):85-90.
11. Chang W.K., Hu Alvin Y.J., Horng R.Y., Tzou W.Y. Membrane bioreactor with nonwoven fabrics as solid-liquid separation media for wastewater treatment. Desalination 2007, 202(1-3):122-128.
12. Seo G.T., Moon B.H., Lee T.S., Lim T.J., Kim I.S. Non-woven fabric filter separation activated sludge reactor for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47(1):133-138.
13. Ren X., Shon H.K., Jang N., Lee Y.G., Bae M., Lee J., Cho K., Kim I.S. Novel membrane bioreactor (MBR) coupled with a nonwoven fabric filter for household wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2010, 44(3):751-760.
14. Meng F., Chae S.R., Drews A., Kraume M., Shin H.S., Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res. 2009, 43:1489-1512.
15. M.R.A. Moghaddam, Y. Guan, H. Satoh, T. Mino, Filter clogging in coarse pore filtration activated sludge process under high MLSS concentration. Water Sci. Technol. 54 (10) 55-66.
16. G.T. Seo, B.H. Moon, Y.M. Park, S.H. Kim, Filtration characteristics of immersed coarse pore filters in an activated sludge system for domestic wastewater reclamation. Water Sci. Technol. 55 (1-2) 51-58.
17. Tewari P.K., Singh R.K., Batra V.S., Balakrishnan M. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment: filtration performance evaluation of low cost polymeric and ceramic membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 71(2):200-204.
18. Aussawasathien D., Teerawattananon C., Vongachariya A. Separation of micron to sub-micron particles from water: electrospun nylon-6 nanofibrous membrane as pre-filters. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 315:11-19.
19. APHA APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th edition) 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
20. Shirazi S., Lin C.J., Chen D. Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes-a critical review. Desalination 2010, 250:236-248.
21. Guglielmi G., Chiarani D., Judd S.J., Andreottol G. Flux criticality and sustainability in a hollow fibre submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 289:241-248.
22. Hong S.P., Bae T.H., Tak T.M., Hong S., Randall A. Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2002, 143(3):219-228.
23. Han S.S., Bae T.H., Jang G.G., Tak T.M. Influence of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and bioactivities in membrane bioreactor system. Process. Biochem. 2005, 40(7):2393-2400.
24. Trussell R.S., Merlo R.P., Hermanowicz S.W., Jenkins D. Influence of mixed liquor properties and aeration intensity on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor at high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations. Water Res. 2007, 41(5):947-958.
25. Fan F.S., Zhou H.D. Interrelated effects of aeration and mixed liquor fractions on membrane fouling for submerged membrane bioreactor process in wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:2523-2528.
26. Meng F., Yang F., Shi B., Zhang H. A comprehensive study on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors operated under different aeration intensities. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 59(1):91-100.