Elective induction versus spontaneous labour in Latin America

Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Volumn 89, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 657-665

  Guerra, Gláucia Virgínia ^a   Cecatti, José Guilherme ^a   Souza, João Paulo ^b   Faúndes, Aníbal ^a   Morais, Sirlei Siani ^a   Gü̈lmezoglu, Ahmet Metin ^b   Passini Jr , Renato ^a   Parpinelli, Mary Angela ^a   Carroli, Guillermo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^c Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN; UTEROTONIC AGENT;

BIRTH RATE; BREASTFEEDING; CHILD HEALTH; HEALTH GEOGRAPHY; MATERNAL HEALTH; PREGNANCY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BREAST FEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; FEMALE; FETUS OUTCOME; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA; SPONTANEOUS LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 80052360604     PISSN: 00429686     EISSN: 15640604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.08.061226     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628-33. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70265-6 PMID:10076139
2. Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:164-7. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02047-1 MID:12100818
3. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cárdenas V, Nelson JC, Holt VL, Gardella C, Easterling TR. Induction of labor in the absence of standard medical indications: incidence and correlates. Med Care 2007;45:505-12. doi:10.1097/ MLR.0b013e3180330e26 PMID:17515777
4. Rayburn WF. Minimizing the risks from elective induction of labor. J Reprod Med 2007;52:671-6. PMID:17879826
5. Sanchez-Ramos L. Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005;32:181-200, viii.doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2004.12.004 PMID:15899354
6. Goffinet F, Dreyfus M, Carbonne B, Magnin G, Cabrol D. Survey of the practice of cervical ripening and labor induction in France. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2003;32:638-46. PMID:14699333
7. Blair EM. Induction of labour by rupture of the membranes. Can Med Assoc J 1936;34:49-52. PMID:20320129
8. Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Kishi GY. The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1355-62. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.106248 PMID:10871449
9. Salinas PH, Carmona GS, Albornoz VJ, Veloz RP, Terra VR, Marchant GR et al. ¿Se puede reducir el índice de cesárea? Experiencia del hospital clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2004;69:8-15. Spanish
10. Boulvain M, Marcoux S, Bureau M, Fortier M, Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001;15:131-8. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00337.x PMID:11383577
11. Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565-72. doi:10.1067/mob.2003.458 PMID:12824994
12. Battista L, Chung JH, Lagrew DC, Wing DA. Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:241.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.027 PMID:17826404
13. Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1690-6, discussion 1696-7. PMID:1615976
14. Glantz JC. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 2005;50:235-40. PMID:15916205
15. Tan PC, Suguna S, Vallikkannu N, Hassan J. Predictors of newborn a dmission after labour induction at term: Bishop score, pre-induction ultrasonography and clinical risk factors. Singapore Med J 2008;49:193-8. PMID:18362999
16. Dublin S, Lydon-Rochelle M, Kaplan RC, Watts DH, Critchlow CW. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:986-94. doi:10.1067/ mob.2000.106748 PMID:11035351
17. Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:240-4. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.119643 PMID:11854642
18. Kaufman KE, Bailit JL, Grobman W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:858-63. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.127147 PMID:12388964
19. Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690-7. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000152338.76759.38 PMID:15802392
20. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco, A, etal.; WHO 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health research group. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006;367:1819-29. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7 PMID:16753484
21. Shah A, Faundes A, Machoki M, Bataglia V, Amokrane F, Donner A etal. Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:126-31. doi:10.2471/BLT.06.039842 PMID:18297167
22. Wilson BL. Assessing the effects of age, gestation, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity on labor inductions. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39:208-13. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00170.x PMID:17760792
23. Bishop, EH. Elective induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1955;5:519-27. PMID:14370696
24. Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:47-52. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00115-X PMID:9649091
25. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman, MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698-704. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000157436.68847.3b PMID:15802393
26. Le Ray C, Carayol M, Bréart G, Goffinet F; PREMODA Study Group. Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:657-65. doi:10.1080/00016340701245427 PMID:17520395
27. Zhang J, Yancey MK, Henderson CEUS. U.S. national trends in labor induction, 1989-1998. J Reprod Med 2002;47:120-4. PMID:11883350
28. Beebe LA, Rayburn WF, Beaty CM, Eberly KL, Stanley JR, Rayburn LA. Indications for labor induction. Differences between university and community hospitals. J Reprod Med 2000;45:469-75. PMID:10900580
29. Bennett BB. Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:832-3. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00036-7 PMID:9166339
30. Blanchette HA, Nayak S, Erasmus S. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1551-9. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70051-7 PMID:10368503
31. Kacmar, J, Bhimani, L, Boyd, M, Shah-Hosseini, R, Peipert, J. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: a case-control study. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:141-5. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00404-6 PMID:12850620
32. Kaczmarczyk M, Sparén P, Terry P, Cnattingius S. Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal consequences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden. BJOG 2007;114:1208-14. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01484.x PMID:17877673
33. van Gemund N, Hardeman A, Scherjon SA, Kanhai HH. Intervention rates after elective induction of labor compared to labor with a spontaneous onset. A matched cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2003;56:133-8. doi:10.1159/000073771 PMID:14530612665