Individual responsibilities and moral inclusion in an age of rights

Culture and Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 281-296

  Passini, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

duty; human rights; individualism; moral inclusion; responsibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052356302     PISSN: 1354067X     EISSN: 14617056     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X11408130     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Auhagen, A.E., & Bierhoff, H.W. (2001). Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon. London: Routledge.
2. Aziz, N. (1999). The human rights debate in an era of globalization: Hegemony of discourses. In V. N. Peter (Ed.), Debating human rights (pp. 31-55). New York: Routledge.
3. Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27-46.
4. Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality: An egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bhatia, S. (2000). Can we return to the concept of duty in a culture of rights? Implications for morality and identity. Culture & Psychology, 6, 303-316.
6. Bierhoff, H.W. (2001). Responsibility and altruism. In A. E. Auhagen & H. W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 149-166). London: Routledge.
7. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
8. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Dewey, J. (1930). Individualism, old and new. New York: Minton.
10. Doise, W. (2002). Human rights as social representations. London/New York: Routledge.
11. Donohue, W.A. (1990). The new freedom: Individualism and collectivism in the social lives of Americans. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
12. Donnelly, J. (2007). The relative universality of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29, 281-306.
13. Donnelly, J. (2008). Human rights: Both universal and relative (A reply to Michael Goodhart). Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 194-204.
14. Dovidio, J.F., Brigham, C.J., Johnson, B.T., & Gaertner, S.L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination Another look. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). New York: Guilford.
15. Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Dworkin, R. (2007). Cosa sono i diritti umani? [What are human rights?]. Ragion Pratica, 2, 469-482.
17. Etzioni, A. (1991). The community in an age of individualism: An interview with Amitai Etzioni. The Futurist,. May-June, 35-39.
18. Finkel, N.J., & Moghaddam, F.M. (2005). The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. Gaertner, S.L., Rust, M.C., Dovidio, J.F., Bachman, B.A., & Anastasio, P.A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224-249.
20. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Rust, M.C., Nier, J.A., Baker, B.S., & Ward, C.M.,et al(2000). The common ingroup identity model for reducing intergroup bias: Progress and challenges. In D. Capozza & R. Brown (Eds.), Social identity processes (pp. 133-148). London: Sage.
21. Goodhart, M. (2008). Neither relative nor universal: A response to Donnelly. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 183-193.
22. Haskell, T.L. (2005). Taking duties seriously: To what problems are rights and duties the solution?. In N. J. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 243-252). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252-264.
24. Hogg, M.A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-255.
25. Ignatieff, M. (2001). Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Klandermans, B., Sabucedo, J.M., & Rodriguez, M. (2004). Inclusiveness of identification among farmers in The Netherlands and Galicia (Spain). European Journal of Social Psychology, 304, 279-295.
28. Lipovetsky, G. (1992). Le crépuscule du devoir: L'éthique indolore des nouveaux temps démocratiques. Paris: Gallimard.
29. Louis, W.R., & Taylor, D.M. (2005). Rights and duties as group norms: Implications of intergroup research for the study of rights and responsibilities. In N. J. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 105-134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Macpherson, C.B. (1964). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. London: Oxford University Press.
31. Madiot, Y. (1991). Droits de l'homme. Paris/Milan/ Barcelona: Masson.
32. Mandela, N. (1994). Long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
33. Markovà, I. (1997). The individual and the community: A post-communist perspective. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 3-17.
34. Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. McFarland, S., & Mathews, M. (2005). Who cares about human rights?. Political Psychology, 26, 365-385.
36. McKeon, R. (1957). The development and the significance of the concept of responsibility. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 39, 3-32.
37. Mitchell, L.E. (1998). Stacked deck: A story of selfishness in America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
38. Moghaddam, F.M. (2000). Toward a cultural theory of human rights. Theory & Psychology, 10, 291-312.
39. Moghaddam, F.M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture and Psychology, 9, 221-232.
40. Moghaddam, F.M., & Lvina, E. (2002). Toward a psychology of societal change and stability: The case of human rights and duties. International Journal of Group Tensions, 31, 31-51.
41. Moghaddam, F.M., & Riley, C.J. (2005). Toward a cultural theory of rights and duties in human development. In N. J. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 75-104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Moghaddam, F.M., Slocum, N.R., Finkel, N., Mor, T., & Harre, R. (2000). Toward a cultural theory of duties. Culture and Psychology, 6, 275-302.
43. Morselli, D., & Passini, S. (2010). Avoiding crimes of obedience: A comparative study of the autobiographies of M. K. Gandhi, N. Mandela and M. L. King. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16, 295-319.
44. Moscovici, S., & Perez, J.A. (2007). A study of minorities as victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 725-746.
45. Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1-20.
46. Opotow, S. (2008). "Not so much as place to lay our head.": Moral inclusion and exclusion in the American civil war reconstruction. Social Justice Research, 21, 26-49.
47. Opotow, S., Gerson, J., & Woodside, S. (2005). From moral exclusion to moral inclusion: Theory for teaching peace. Theory into Practice, 44, 303-318.
48. Papastamou, S., Prodromitis, G., & Iatridis, T. (2005). Perceived threats to democracy: An examination of political affiliation and beliefs about terrorism, state control, and human rights. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 249-262.
49. Passini, S., & Morselli, D. (2009). Authority relationships between obedience and disobedience. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 96-106.
50. Rose, N. (1996). Governing 'advanced' liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason (pp. 37-64). London: University College London Press.
51. Schlenker, B.R., Britt, T.W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632-652.
52. Spini, D., & Doise, W. (2005). Universal rights and duties as normative social representation. In N. J. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 21-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53. Spragens Jr., T.A. (1999). Civic liberalism: Reflections on our democratic ideals. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
54. Staerklé, C., & Clémence, A. (2004). Why people are committed to human rights and still tolerate their violation: A contextual analysis of the principle-application gap. Social Justice Research, 17, 389-406.
55. Staerkle, C., Clémence, A., & Doise, W. (1998). Representation of human rights across different national contexts: The role of democratic and non-democratic populations and governments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 207.
56. Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origin of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
58. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
59. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Taylor, C. (1992). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
61. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
62. Waltz, S.E. (2001). Universalizing human rights: The role of small states in the construction of the universal declaration of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 23, 44-72.
63. Worchel, S. (2005). An ontology for duties and rights. In N. J. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical contributions and normative commentaries (pp. 195-220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
64. Zimbardo, P.G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.