Representation of human rights across different national contexts: The role of democratic and non-democratic populations and governments

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 207-226

  Staerklé, Christian ^a   Clémence, Alain ^b   Doise, Willem ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038855221     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<207::AID-EJSP865>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 563-579.
2. Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1987). From individual inputs to group outputs, and back again. Group processes and inferences about members. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes (Vol. 8, pp. 111-143). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Allison, S. T., Worth, L. T., & Campbell King, M. W. (1990). Group decisions as social inference heuristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 801-811.
4. Augoustinos, M., & Walker, I. (1995). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage Publications.
5. Benhabib, S. (Ed.) (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage Publications.
7. Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009-1015.
8. Clémence, A., & Doise, W. (1995). La représentation sociale de la justice: Une approche des droits dans la pensée ordinaire. Année Sociologique, 45, 371-400.
9. Clémence, A., Doise, W., De Rosa, A. M., & Gonzalez, L. (1995). La représentation sociale des droits de l'homme: Une recherche internationale sur l'éténdue et les limites de l'universalité. Journal International de Pychologie, 30, 181-212.
10. Diaz-Veizadez, J., Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., & Gibbs, K. W. (1995). The measurement and structure of human rights attitude. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 313-328.
11. Doise, W., & Herrera, M. (1994). Déclaration universelle et représentations sociales des droits de l'homme: Une étude à Genève. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 7, 85-105.
12. Doise, W., Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13. Doise, W., Spini, D., Jesuino, J. C., Ng, S. H., & Emler, N. (1994). Values and perceived conflicts in the social representations of human rights: Feasibility of a cross-national study. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 240-251.
14. Dreben, E., Fiske, S., & Hastie, R. (1979). The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1758-1768.
15. Feagin, J. R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101-129.
16. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York, Toronto: Free Press.
17. Guimond, S., Begin, G., & Palmer, D. (1989). Education and causal attributions: The development of 'person-blame' and 'system-blame' ideology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 126-140.
18. Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution. London: Basil Blackwell.
19. Humana, C. (1992). World human rights guide (3rd ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Madiot, Y. (1991). Droits de l'homme. Paris: Masson.
21. Martijn, C., Spears, R., Van der Pligt, J., & Jakobs, E. (1992). Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 453-464.
22. Moghaddam, F. M., & Vuksanovic, V. (1990). Attitudes and behavior toward human rights across different contexts: The role of right-wing authoritarism, political ideology, and religiosity. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 455-474.
23. Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse, son image et son public (2nd ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
24. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr, & S. Moscovici (Eds), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1984). De la science au sens commun. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie sociale (pp. 539-566). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
26. Moscovici, S. (1992). La démocratie et rien d'autre. Le genre humain, 26, 31-47.
27. Olson, J. T. (1997). Perceptions of global inequality: A call for research. Social Justice Research, 10, 39-62.
28. Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. Semin, & K. Fiedler (Eds), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11-36). London: Sage.
29. Skowronski, J., & Carlston, D. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 131-142.
30. Skowronski, J., & Carlston, D. (1992). Caught in the act: When impressions on highly diagnostic behaviours are resistant to contradiction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 435-452.
31. Stainton-Rogers, R., & Kitzinger, C. (1995). A decalogue of human rights: What happens when you let the people speak. Social Science Information, 34, 87-106.
32. Van der Pligt, J., & Eiser, J. (1980). Negativity and descriptive extremity in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 415-419.
33. Wagner, W., Elejabarrieta, F., & Lahnsteiner, I. (1995). How the sperm dominates the ovum: objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 671-688.
34. Wish, M., Deutsch, M., & Biener, L. (1970). Differences in conceptual structures of nations: An exploratory study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 361-373.
35. Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. Haslam (Eds), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, U.S.A.: Blackwell Publishers.