'Optimal' retaliation in the WTO - A commentary on the upland cotton arbitration

World Trade Review

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 133-164

  Grossman, Gene M ^a   Sykes, Alan O ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052354582     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745610000522     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Bagwell, Kyle (2008), 'Remedies in the WTO: An Economic Perspective', in Merit E. Janow, Victoria J. Donaldson, and Alan Yanovich (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries, Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing, pp. 733-770.
2. Bagwell, Kyle and Robert W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. -(2006), 'Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?', The American Economic Review, 96(3): 877-895.
4. Baldwin, Richard E. (1987), ' Politically Realistic Objective Functions and Trade Policy: PROFS and Tariffs', Economics Letters, 24(3): 287-290.
5. Beshkar, Mostafa (2010), 'Optimal Remedies in International Trade Agreements ', European Economic Review, 54(3): 455-466.
6. Bown, Chad P. and Michele Ruta (2010), 'The Economics of Permissible WTO Retaliation', in Chad P. Bown and Joost Pauwelyn (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149-193.
7. Howse, Robert and Damien J. Neven (2005), 'United States - Tax Treatment for "Foreign Sales Corporations ", Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22.6 of the DSU and Article 4.11 of the SCM Agreement (WT/DS108/ARB), A Comment', in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36-63.
8. Howse, Robert and Robert W. Staiger (2006), 'United States - Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Original Complaint by the European Communities) - Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ARB, 24 February 2004: A Legal and Economic Analysis', in Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2003: The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254-279.
9. Jackson, John H. (1997), 'The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding -Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation', American Journal of International Law, 91(1): 60-64.
10. Lawrence, Robert Z. (2003), Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation Under the WTO, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
11. Schnepf, Randy (2010), Brazil's WTO Case Against the US Cotton Program, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
12. Schropp, Simon A. B. (2009), Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO: A Law and Economics Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Schwartz, Warren F. and Alan O. Sykes (2002), 'The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization', The Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): S179-S204. (Pubitemid 36932229)
14. Sykes, Alan O. (2000), 'The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?', in Marco Bronckers and Reinhard Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson, The Hague: Kluwer, pp. 347-357.