SDI normalization and alternatives

Desalination

Volumn 279, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 390-403

  Alhadidi, A ^a   Kemperman, A J B ^a   Schippers, J C ^b   Blankert, B ^c   Wessling, M ^a   van der Meer, W G J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

^c Norit X Flow   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Mathematical models; Normalization; Silt Density Index; Testing conditions; Volume based Silt Density Index

Indexed keywords

COLLOIDAL CONCENTRATIONS; FILTRATION MODEL; FOULING INDICES; FOULING MECHANISMS; FOULING POTENTIAL; INITIAL FLOW; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; MEMBRANE RESISTANCE; MODIFIED FOULING INDEX; NORMALIZATION; PARTICLE CONCENTRATIONS; PROFESSIONAL SKILLS; REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEMS; SILT DENSITY INDEX; TEST CONDITION; TESTING CONDITIONS; UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE; VOLUME-BASED SILT DENSITY INDEX;

FLOW RATE; MEMBRANE FOULING; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SILT; TESTING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

COLLOID; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DENSITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOULING; MEMBRANE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OSMOSIS; TESTING METHOD;

EID: 80052343788     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.042     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nahrstedt A., Camargo-Schmale J. New Insights into Silt Density Index and Modified Fouling Index Measurements 2008, IWA, San Francisco, USA.
2. Zhao Y., Taylor J., Hong S. Combined influence of membrane surface properties and feed water qualities on RO/NF mass transfer, a pilot study. Water Res. 2005, 39:1233-1244.
3. Vrijenhoek E.M., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:115-128.
4. Nystrom M., Pihlajamiiki A., Ehsani N. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 87:245-256.
5. Elimelech M., Childress A.E. Zeta potential of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for membrane performance. Water Treatment Technology Program Report 1996, 10. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Los Angeles CA 90024-1593.
6. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., Waypa J.J. Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination 1994, 95:269-286.
7. Ernst M., Bismarck A., Springer J., Jekel M. Zeta-potential and rejection rates of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane in single salt solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165:251-259.
8. Ziel R., Haus A., Tulke A. Quantification of the pore size distribution (porosity profiles) in microfiltration membranes by SEM, TEM and computer image analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323:241-246.
9. Chandler M., Zydney A. Effects of membrane pore geometry on fouling behavior during yeast cell microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 285:334-342.
10. Yiantsios S.G., Sioutopoulos D., Karabelas A.J. Colloidal fouling of RO membranes: an overview of key issues and efforts to develop improved prediction techniques. Desalination 2005, 183:257-272.
11. Manttari M., Pihajamaki A., Nystrom M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membrane at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:311-320.
12. Yiantsios S.G., Karabelas A.J. An assessment of the Silt Density Index based on RO membrane colloidal fouling experiments with iron oxide particles. Desalination 2003, 151:229-238.
13. Schippers J.C., Verdouw J. The modified fouling index, a method of determining the fouling characteristics of water. Desalination 1980, 32:137-148.
14. Bonnelye V., Sanz M.A., Durand J.-P., Gueguen F.d.r., Mazounie P. Reverse osmosis on open intake seawater: pre-treatment strategy. Desalination 2004, 167:191-200.
15. Teng C.K., Hawlader M.N.A., Malek A. An experiment with different pretreatment methods. Desalination 2003, 156:51-58.
16. Vial D., Doussau G. The use of microfiltration membranes for seawater pre-treatment prior to reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2002, 153:141-147.
17. Vial D., Doussaua G., Galindob R. Comparison of three pilot studies using Microza membranes for Mediterranean seawater pre-treatment. Desalination 2003, 156:43-50.
18. Lueck S. Reducing RO operating costs with automated monitoring technology. International Water Conference 1999, IWC, Pittsburgh.
19. A. Alhadidi, A.J.B. Kemperman, J.C. Schippers, M. Wessling, W.G.J. van der Meer, Silt density index and modified fouling index relation, and effect of pressure, temperature and membrane resistance, Desalination 273 (2010) 48-56.
20. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws - application to power-low non-newtonian fluids. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1982, 60:183-187.
21. Blankert B., Betlem B.H.L., Roffel B. Dynamic optimization of a dead-end filtration trajectory: blocking filtration laws. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 285:90-95.
22. A. Alhadidi, B. Blankert, A.J.B. Kemperman, J.C. Schippers, M. Wessling, W.G.J. van der Meer, Effect of testing conditions and filtration mechanisms on SDI, Submitted to J. Membr. Sci., (2010).
23. Rao C.R., Toutenburg H., Fieger A., Heumann C., Nittner T., Scheid S. Linear Models: Least Squares and Alternatives 1999, Springer, New York.
24. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2nd ed.
25. A. Alhadidi, A.J.B. Kemperman, J.C. Schippers, M. Wessling, W.G.J. van der Meer, The influence of membrane properties on the Silt Density Index, Submitted to J. Membr. Sci., (2010).
26. A. Alhadidi, A.J.B. Kemperman, J.C. Schippers, M. Wessling, W.G.J. van der Meer, Evaluate the fouling challenge in a RO/UF desalination plant using SDI, SDI+ and MFI, To be submitted (2010).
27. A. Alhadidi, B. Blankert, A.J.B. Kemperman, J.C. Schippers, M. Wessling, W.G.J. van der Meer, Sensitivity of SDI for the error in measuring the testing parameters, To be submitted (2010).