Effects of ionizing radiation on wildlife: What knowledge have we gained between the chernobyl and fukushima accidents?

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 371-373

  Beresford, Nicholas A ^a   Copplestone, David ^b  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chernobyl; Chronic exposure; Effects; Radiation protection; Radionuclides; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; IONIZING RADIATION; JAPAN; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANT; TIME;

ANIMALS; CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR ACCIDENT; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTOXICOLOGY; JAPAN; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RADIATION, IONIZING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80052313160     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.238     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beresford NA, Barnett CL, Jones DG, Wood MD, Appleton JD, Breward N, Copplestone D. 2008. Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales. J Environ Radioact 99:1430-1439.
2. Beresford NA, Gaschak S, Barnett CL, Howard BJ, Chizhevsky I, Strømman G, Oughton DH, Wright SM,Maksimenko A, Copplestone D. 2008. Estimating the exposure of small mammals at three sites within the Chernobyl exclusion zone- a test application of the ERICA Tool. J Environ Radioact 99:1496-1502.
3. 90strontium in small mammals at Chornobyl, Ukraine. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:305-312.
4. Geras'kin SA, Fesenko SV, Alexakhin RM. 2008. Effects of non-human species irradiation after the Chernobyl NPP accident. Environ Int 34:880-897.
5. Howard BJ, Beresford NA, Andersson P, Brown JE, Copplestone D, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Garnier-Laplace J, Howe PD, Oughton D, Whitehouse P. 2010. Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context - an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project. J Radiol Prot 30:195-214.
6. [IAEA] International Atomic Energy Agency. 2006. Environmental consequences of the Chernobyl accident and their remediation: twenty years of experience. Vienna (AT): IAEA. STI/PUB/1239.
7. Matson CW, Rodgers BE, Chesser RK, Baker RJ. 2000. Genetic diversity of Clethrionomys glareolus populations from highly contaminated sites in the Chornobyl region, Ukraine. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2130-2135.
8. Møller AP, Mousseau TA. 2007. Species richness and abundance of forest birds in relation to radiation at Chernobyl. Biol Lett 3:483-486.
9. Møller AP, Mousseau TA. 2009. Reduced abundance of insects and spiders linked to radiation at Chernobyl 20 years after the accident. Biol Lett 5:356-359.
10. Møller AP, Mousseau TA. 2011. Efficiency of bio-indicators for low-level radiation under field conditions. Ecol Indicators 11:424-430.
11. Mousseau TA, Møller AP. 2011. Landscape portrait: a look at the impact of radioactive contaminants on Chernobyl's wildlife. Bull Atomic Scientists 67:38-46.
12. Rodgers BE, Baker RJ. 2000. Frequencies of micronuclei in bank voles from zones of high radiation at Chornobyl, Ukraine. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1644-1648.
13. Ryabokon NI, Goncharova RI. 2006. Transgenerational accumulation of radiation damage in small mammals chronically exposed to Chernobyl fallout. Radiat Environ Biophys 45:167-177.
14. Ryabokon NI, Smolich II, Kudryashov VP, Goncharova RI. 2005. Long-term development of the radionuclide exposure of murine rodent populations in Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys 44:169-181.
15. Smith JT. 2008. Is Chernobyl radiation really causing negative individual and population-level effects on barn swallows? Biol Lett 4:63-64.
16. Whicker FW, Schultz V. 1982. Radioecology: nuclear energy and the environment. Volume II. Boca Raton (FL): CRC. 228 p.
17. Wickliffe JK, Baker RJ. 2011. Clarification and explanation of experimental design and mechanistic dose-response effects for significant radioecological impacts. Biol Lett 5:356-359.