Alternative approaches to assessing intervention effectiveness in randomized trials: Application in a colorectal cancer screening study

Cancer Causes and Control

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1233-1241

  Maxwell, Annette E ^a   Crespi, Catherine M ^a   Danao, Leda L ^a   Antonio, Cynthia ^a   Garcia, Gabriel M ^b   Bastani, Roshan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Immigrants; Subgroup analysis; Validation of self report

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN AMERICAN; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FILIPINO AMERICAN; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SELF REPORT; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; VALIDATION STUDY;

ASIAN AMERICANS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PHILIPPINES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052310453     PISSN: 09575243     EISSN: 15737225     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9793-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AE Maxwell CM Crespi 2009 Trends in colorectal cancer screening utilization among ethnic groups in California: are we closing the gap? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18 3 752 759 19273482 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0608
2. AE Maxwell LL Danao CM Crespi C Antonio GM Garcia R Bastani 2008 Disparities in the receipt of fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy among Filipino American immigrants Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 8 1963 1967 18708385 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2800
3. AE Maxwell R Bastani LL Danao C Antonio GM Garcia CM Crespi 2010 Results of a community-based randomized trial to increase colorectal cancer screening among Filipino Americans Am J Public Health 100 11 2228 2234 20864724 10.2105/AJPH.2009.176230
4. RL Kruse BS Alper C Reust JJ Stevermer S Shannon RH Williams 2002 Intention-to-treat analysis: who is in? Who is out? J Fam Pract 51 11 969 971 12485553 (Pubitemid 35291620)
5. LL Gluud 2006 Bias in clinical intervention research Am J Epidemiol 163 6 493 501 16443796 10.1093/aje/kwj069
6. R Bastani BA Glenn AE Maxwell AM Jo 2007 Hepatitis B among Korean Americans: finding ways to improve testing, vaccination, and better health outcomes Ethn Dis 17 2 416 417 17684794 Spring
7. R Bastani AE Maxwell C Bradford IP Das KX Yan 1999 Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer Prev Med 29 5 355 364 10564627 10.1006/pmed.1999.0556 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fjtl2gsA%3D%3D
8. R Bastani BA Glenn VM Taylor MS Chen Jr TT Nguyen SL Stewart, et al. 2010 Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: The health behavior framework Prev Med 50 1-2 63 67 19716379 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.010
9. KM Schueler PW Chu R Smith-Bindman 2008 Factors associated with mammography utilization: a systematic quantitative review of the literature J Women's Health (2002) 17 9 1477 1498 10.1089/jwh.2007.0603
10. AE Maxwell R Bastani US Warda 1997 Breast cancer screening and related attitudes among Filipino-American women Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6 9 719 726 9298580 1:STN:280:DyaK2svktl2juw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27427628)
11. Little RJA, Rubin DB (2002) Statistical analysis with missing data, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
12. Moye LA (2003) Multiple analyses in clinical trials. Springer, New York
13. PR Rosenbaum DB Rubin 1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 41 55 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
14. VS Harder FA Stuart JC Anthony 2010 Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research Psychol Methods 15 234 249 20822250 10.1037/a0019623
15. R Bastani BA Glenn AE Maxwell PA Ganz CM Mojica LC Chang 2008 Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in a study of ethnically diverse first-degree relatives of CRC cases Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 4 791 798 18381469 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2625 (Pubitemid 351536407)
16. AC Marcus M Mason P Wolfe BK Rimer I Lipkus V Strecher, et al. 2005 The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service J Health commun 10 Suppl 1 83 104 16377602 10.1080/10810730500257754 (Pubitemid 43041760)
17. JM Walsh CP Kaplan B Nguyen G Gildengorin SJ McPhee EJ Perez-Stable 2004 Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Latino and Vietnamese Americans. Compared with non-Latino white Americans J Gen Intern Med 19 2 156 166 15009795 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30263.x (Pubitemid 38368464)
18. GN Ioannou MK Chapko JA Dominitz 2003 Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States Am J Gastroenterol 98 9 2082 2091 14499792 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07574.x (Pubitemid 37185810)
19. JG Zapka E Puleo M Vickers-Lahti R Luckmann 2002 Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening Am J Prev Med 23 1 28 35 12093420 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00444-0 (Pubitemid 34687129)
20. SW Vernon JA Tiro RW Vojvodic S Coan PM Diamond A Greisinger, et al. 2008 Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 4 758 767 18381467 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2855 (Pubitemid 351536403)
21. GH Rauscher TP Johnson YI Cho JA Walk 2008 Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 4 748 757 18381468 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2629 (Pubitemid 351536402)
22. VM Taylor TG Hislop SP Tu C Teh E Acorda MP Yip, et al. 2009 Evaluation of a hepatitis B lay health worker intervention for Chinese Americans and Canadians J Community Health 34 3 165 172 19127416 10.1007/s10900-008-9138-0
23. VM Taylor TG Hislop JC Jackson SP Tu Y Yasui SM Schwartz, et al. 2002 A randomized controlled trial of interventions to promote cervical cancer screening among Chinese women in North America J Natl Cancer Inst 94 9 670 677 11983755 (Pubitemid 34552487)
24. IM Lipkus CS Skinner J Dement L Pompeii B Moser GP Samsa, et al. 2005 Increasing colorectal cancer screening among individuals in the carpentry trade: test of risk communication interventions Prev Med 40 5 489 501 15749130 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.019 (Pubitemid 40320714)
25. AE Maxwell AM Jo CM Crespi M Sudan R Bastani 2010 Peer navigation improves diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening among Korean American women: results of a randomized trial Cancer Causes Control 21 11 1931 1940 20676928 10.1007/s10552-010-9621-7
26. AM Jo AE Maxwell WK Wong R Bastani 2008 Colorectal cancer screening among underserved Korean Americans in Los Angeles County J Immigr Minor Health 10 2 119 126 17574545 10.1007/s10903-007-9066-6 (Pubitemid 351338759)
27. LC Seeff MR Nadel CN Klabunde T Thompson JA Shapiro SW Vernon, et al. 2004 Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult US population Cancer 100 10 2093 2103 15139050 10.1002/cncr.20276 (Pubitemid 38580326)