Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Lund, Ole ^a   Bland, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORTALITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 33745223314     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.01.043     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bonow R.O., Carabello B., De Leon A.C., et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 32 (1998) 1486-1488
2. Arias E. United States life tables, 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 53 no 6 (2004), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD
3. Lund O., Magnussen K., Knudsen M., Pilegaard H., Nielsen T.T., and Albrechtsen O.K. The potential for normal long term survival and morbidity rates after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 5 (1996) 258-267
4. Lund O., Nielsen T.T., Magnussen K., Pilegaard H.K., and Knudsen M.A. Valve replacement for calcified aortic stenosis in septuagenarians infers normal life-length. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 25 (1991) 37-44
5. Wheatley D.J. The threshold age in choosing biological versus mechanical prostheses in Western countries. J Heart Valve Dis 13 (2004) 1-4
6. Grunkemeier G.L., Naftel D.C., Starr A., and Rahimtoola S.H. Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. Curr Probl Cardiol 25 (2000) 73-154
7. Dagenais F., Cartier P., Voisine P., et al. Which valve should we select for the 45- to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 (2005) 1041-1049
8. Rothwell P.M., Coull A.J., Giles M.F., et al. Change in stroke incidence, mortality, case-fatality, severity, and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford Vascular Study). Lancet 363 (2004) 1925-1933
9. Birkmeyer N.J., Birkmeyer J.D., Tosteson A.N., Grunkemeier G.L., Marrin C.A., and O'Connor G.T. Prosthetic valve type for patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. a decision analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 70 (2000) 1946-1952
10. Kassai B., Gueyffier F., Cucherat M., and Boissel J.C. Comparison of bioprosthesis and mechanical valves, a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Cardiovasc Surg 8 (2000) 477-483
11. Puvimanasinghe J.P., Takkenberg J.J., Edwards M.B., et al. Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation. Heart 90 (2004) 1172-1178
12. Stroup D.F., Berlin J.A., Morton S.C., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283 (2000) 2008-2012
13. Edmunds L.H., Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., Miller D.C., and Weisel R.D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 96 (1988) 351-353
14. Edmunds L.H., Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., Grunkemeier G.L., Miller D.C., and Weisel R.D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112 (1996) 708-711
15. Stata Release 8 Base Reference Manual (2003), Stata Press, College Station, TX
16. Grunkemeier G.L., and Wu Y.X. "Our complication rates are lower than theirs". statistical critique of heart valve comparisons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125 (2003) 290-300
17. Rao V., Jamieson W.R., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 Suppl 3 (2000) III5-III9
18. Bech-Hanssen O., Caidahl K., Wall B., Myken P., and Larsson S. Influence of aortic valve replacement, prosthesis type, and size on functional outcome and ventricular mass in patients with aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118 (1999) 57-65
19. Blackstone E.H., Cosgrove D.M., Jamieson W.R., et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126 (2003) 783-796
20. Lund O., Chandrasekaran V., Grocott-Mason R., et al. Primary aortic valve replacement with allografts over twenty-five years. valve-related and procedure-related determinants of outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117 (1999) 77-90
21. Ho K.K.L., Anderson K.M., Kannel W.B., Grossman W., and Levy D. Survival after the onset of congestive heart failure in Framingham heart study subjects. Circulation 88 (1993) 107-115
22. Kirch M., Nakashima K., Kubota S., et al. The risk of reoperative heart valve procedure in octogenarian patients. J Heart Valve Dis 13 (2004) 991-996
23. Cannegieter S.C., Rosendaal F.R., and Briet E. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation 89 (1994) 635-641
24. Acar J., Iung B., Boissel J.P., et al. AREVA. multicenter randomized comparison of low-dose versus standard-dose anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Circulation 94 (1996) 2107-2112
25. Völler H., Dovifat C., and Glatz J. Home management of anticoagulation. Eur Heart J Suppl 3 Suppl Q (2001) Q4 4-9
26. Palareti G., Leali N., Coccheri S., et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment. an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Lancet 348 (1996) 423-428
27. Oden A., and Fahlen M. Oral anticoagulation and risk of death. a medical record linkage study. BMJ 325 (2002) 1073-1075
28. Butchart E.G., de la Santa P.M., Rooney S.J., and Lewis P.A. Arterial risk factors and ischemic cerebrovascular events after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis 4 (1995) 1-8
29. Oxenham H., Bloomfield P., Wheatley D.J., et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Heart 89 (2003) 715-721
30. Hammermeister K., Sethi G.K., Henderson W.G., Grover F.L., Oprian C., and Rahimtoola S.H. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve. final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 1152-1158