The role of nature in the place meanings and practices of cottage owners in northern environments

Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 175-187

  Pitkänen, Kati ^a   Puhakka, Riikka ^b   Sawatzky, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cottage; Management of nature preferences; Place attachment; Second home

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; RENTAL SECTOR; RURAL AREA; RURAL LANDSCAPE; SECOND HOME; TOURISM MANAGEMENT;

CANADA; FINLAND;

EID: 80052283783     PISSN: 00291951     EISSN: 15025292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2011.598236     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Berglund, E. 2001. Facts, beliefs and biases: Perspectives on forest conservation in Finland. Environmental Planning and Management 44, 833-849.
2. Braun, B. 2002. The Intemperate Rainforest: Nature, Culture, and Power on Canada's West Coast. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
3. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77-101.
4. Brehm, J.M. 2007. Community attachment: The complexity and consequence of the natural environment facet. Human Ecology 35, 477-488.
5. Castree, N. 2005. Nature. Routledge, London. Coppock, J.T. (ed.) 1977. Second Homes: Curse or Blessing? Pergamon, Oxford.
6. Davenport, M.A. & Anderson, D.H. 2005. Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society and Natural Resources 18, 625-641.
7. Denscombe, M. 2003. The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Social Research Projects. 2nd ed. Open University Press, Buckingham.
8. Eagles, P.F.J. 2002. Trends in park tourism: Economics, finance and management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 10, 132-153.
9. Frauman, E. & Banks, S. 2011. Gateway community resident perceptions of tourism development: Incorporating Importance-Performance Analysis into a Limits of Acceptable Change framework. Tourism Management 32, 128-140.
10. Gunderson, K. & Watson, A. 2007. Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Society and Natural Resources 20, 705-721.
11. Gustafson, P. 2002. Place, Place Attachment and Mobility. Göteborg Studies in Sociology No. 6. Department of Sociology, Göteborg University, Göteborg.
12. Häyrynen, M. 2005. Kuvitettu maa: Suomen kansallisten maisemakuvastojen rakentuminen. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran Toimituksia 834. SKS, Helsinki.
13. Haldrup, M. 2004. Laid-back mobilities: Second-home holidays in time and space. Tourism Geographies 6, 434-454.
14. Hallikainen, V. 1998. The Finnish Wilderness Experience. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 711. Rovaniemi Research Station, Metla.
15. Halseth, G. 1998. Cottage Country in Transition: A Social Geography of Change and Contention in the Rural-Recreational Countryside. McGill- Queen's University Press, Montreal.
16. Halseth, G. 2004. The 'cottage' privilege: Increasingly elite landscapes of second homes in Canada. Hall, C.M. & Mü ller, D.K. (eds.) Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes: Between Elite Landscapes and Common Ground, 35-54. Channel View, Clevedon.
17. Helsingin Sanomat. 2009. Mökkiläiset levittäytyvät saimaannorpan kotirannoille (Samuli Laita). 19 May. Helsinki.
18. Hidalgo, M.C. & Hernández, B. 2001. Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21, 273-281.
19. Holstein, J.A. & Gubrium, J.F. 1995. The Active Interview. Sage, London.
20. Jaakson, R. 1986. Second-home domestic tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 13, 367-391.
21. Jokinen, A. 2002. Free-time habitation and layers of ecological history at a southern Finnish lake. Landscape and Urban Planning 61, 99-112.
22. Kaltenborn, B.P. 1997. Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in Southern Norway. Leisure Sciences 19, 175-189.
23. Kaltenborn, B.P. 1998. The alternate home - motives of recreation home use. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 52, 121-134.
24. Kaltenborn, B.P. & Bjerke, T. 2002. Associations between landscape preferences and place attachment: A study in Røros, Southern Norway. Landscape Research 27, 381-396.
25. Kaltenborn, B.P. & Williams, D.R. 2002. The meaning of place: Attachments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and locals. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography 56, 189-198.
26. Kelly, G. & Hosking, K. 2008. Nonpermanent residents, place attachment, and 'sea change' communities. Environment and Behaviour 40, 575-594.
27. Kremarik, F. 2002. A Little Place in the Country: A Profile of Canadians Who Own Vacation Property. Canadian Social Trends. Statistics Canada - Catalogue No. 11-008. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2002001/article/6196-eng.pdf (accessed July 2009).
28. Lane, M.B. 2001. Affirming new directions in planning theory: Comanagement of protected areas. Society and Natural Resources 14, 657-671.
29. Lehtinen, A.A. 1991. The northern natures: A study of the forest question emerging within the timber-line conflict in Finland. Fennia 169, 57-169.
30. Lehtinen, A.A. 2006. Postcolonialism, Multitude, and the Politics of Nature: On the Changing Geographies of the European North. University Press of America, Lanham.
31. Low, S.M. & Altman, I. 1992. Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. Altman, I. & Low, S.M. (eds.) Place attachment, 1-12. Plenum Press, New York.
32. Lundmark, L. & Marjavaara, R. 2005. Second home localizations in the Swedish mountain range. Tourism 53, 3-16.
33. Manitoba Conservation. 2008. Eastern Region Parks. http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/parks/popular-parks/eastern.html (accessed September 2008).
34. Manitoba Conservation. 2010. Proposed joint development of new cottage lots to boost local economy, create jobs, spur tourism. News Release, 14 September 2010. http://www.gov.mb.ca/chc/press/top/2010/09/2010-09-14-141900-9703.html (accessed December 2010).
35. Matarrita-Cascante, D., Stedman, R. & Luloff, A.E. 2010. Permanent and seasonal residents' community attachment in natural amenity-rich areas. Environment and Behaviour 42, 197-220.
36. McIntyre, N. & Svanqvist, B. 2004. Living in the forest: Meanings and use of recreational residences. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 2. http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2004/mwp002.htm (accessed July 2009).
37. McIntyre, N. & Pavlovich, K. 2006. Changing places: Amenity coastal communities in transition. McIntyre, N., Williams, D.R. & McHugh, K.E. (eds.) Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home and Identity, 239-261. Cabi, Wallingford.
38. McIntyre, N., Williams, D.R. & McHugh, K.E. 2006. Multiple dwelling: Prospect and retrospect. McIntyre, N., Williams, D.R. & McHugh, K.E. (eds.) Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home and Identity, 313-322. Cabi, Wallingford.
39. Mels, T. 2002. Nature, home, and scenery: The official spatialities of Swedish national parks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20, 135-154.
40. Metsähallitus. 2008. Suojelualueiden hoidon ja käytön periaatteet. Metsä-hallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja B 89. Metsähallitus, Vantaa. (http://julkaisut.metsa.fi/julkaisut/pdf/luo/b89.pdf) (accessed November 2010).
41. Metsähallitus. 2010a. Linnansaaren kansallispuiston hoito- ja käyttö suunnitelma. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja C. http://julkaisut.metsa.fi/julkaisut/pdf/luo/c77.pdf (accessed December 2010).
42. Metsähallitus. 2010b. Yhteisen luontomme hoitaja: Vuosikertomus 2009. Metsähallituksen luontopalvelut. http://julkaisut.metsa.fi/julkaisut/pdf/luo/vk2009fin.pdf (accessed November 2010).
43. Mitchell, M.Y., Force, J.E., Carroll, M.S. & McLaughlin, W.J. 1993. Forest places of the heart. Journal of Forestry 4, 32-37.
44. Mose, I. (ed.) 2007. Protected Areas and Regional Development in Europe: Towards a New Model for the 21st Century. Ashgate, Aldershot.
45. Nieminen, M. 2009. Kesämökkibarometri 2009. Ministry of Employment and the Economy & Statistics Finland. http://www.tem.fi/files/22175/Mokkibaro08-raportti.pdf (accessed November 2010).
46. Osborne, B.S. 1988. The iconography of nationhood in Canadian art. Cosgrove, D. & Daniels, S. (eds.) The Iconography of Landscape: Essays
47. on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments, 162-178. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Owen, B. 2008. Activists hail park logging ban. Winnipeg Free Press 22 November 2008. http://www.wildernesscommittee.mb.ca/graphics/articles/08-11-22-fp-art.jpg (accessed March 2010).
49. Pitkänen, K. 2008. Second-home landscape: The meaning(s) of landscape for second-home tourism in Finnish Lakeland. Tourism Geographies 10, 169-192.
50. Puhakka, R. 2008. Increasing role of tourism in Finnish National Parks. Fennia 186, 47-58.
51. Puhakka, R., Sarkki, S., Cottrell, S.P. & Siikamäki, P. 2009. Local discourses and international initiatives: Socio-cultural sustainability of tourism in Oulanka National Park, Finland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17, 529-549.
52. Raitio, K. 2008. 'You Can't Please Everyone' - Conflict Management Practices, Frames and Institutions in Finnish State Forests. University of Joensuu, Publications in Social Sciences 86. http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn-isbn-978-952-219-117-5/urn-isbn-978-952-219-117-5.pdf (accessed November 2010).
53. Relph, E. 1986. Place and Placelessness. Pion, London.
54. Saar, M. & Palang, H. 2009. The dimensions of place meanings. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 3. http:www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2009-3 (accessed March 2010).
55. Saarinen, J. 2005. Tourism in the northern wildernesses: Wilderness discourses and the development of nature-based tourism in Northern Finland. Hall, C.M. & Boyd, S. (eds.) Nature-based Tourism in Peripheral Areas: Development or Disaster, 36-49. Channel View, Clevedon.
56. Sandberg, L.A. & Sörlin, S. 1998. Rearticulating the environment: Towards a pluralist vision of natural resource use. Sandberg, L.A. & Sörlin, S. (eds.) Sustainability the Challenge: People, Power and the Environment, 1-16. Black Rose Books, Montreal.
57. Sandell, K. 1998. The public access dilemma: The specialization of landscape and the challenge of sustainability in outdoor recreation. Sandberg, L.A. & Sörlin, S. (eds.) Sustainability the Challenge: People, Power and the Environment, 121-129. Black Rose Books, Montreal.
58. Schneider, M. 2002. The then and now of Whiteshell Provincial Park. Whiteshell Echo (Special Edition, April), Whiteshell Cottagers Association.
59. Silverman, D. 2001. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. Sage, London.
60. Smaldone, D., Harris, C. & Sanyal, N. 2008. The role of time in developing place meanings. Journal of Leisure Research 40, 479-504.
61. Statistics Finland. 2008. Kesämökit 2007. http://www.stat.fi/til/kmok/2007/kmok-2007-2008-07-10-kat-001.html (accessed July 2009).
62. Stedman, R.C. 2003. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources 16, 671-685.
63. Stedman, R.C. 2006. Understanding place attachment among second home owners. American Behavioral Scientist 50, 187-205.
64. Stockdale, A. & Barker, A. 2008. Sustainability and the multifunctional landscape: An assessment of approaches to planning and management in the Cairngorms National Park. Land Use Policy 26, 479-492.
65. Svenson, S. 2004. The cottage and the city: An interpretation of the Canadian second home experience. Hall, C.M. & Mü ller, D.K. (eds.) Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes: Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground, 55-74. Channel View, Clevedon.
66. Törn, A., Siikamäki, P., Tolvanen, A., Kauppila, P. & Rämet, J. 2008. Local people, nature conservation and tourism in Northeastern Finland. Ecology and Society 13, 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art8/(accessed April 2008).
67. Tuan, Y.-F. 1975. Place: An experiential perspective. The Geographical Review 65, 151-165.
68. Tuulentie, S. 2006. Tourists making themselves at home: Second homes as a part of tourist careers. McIntyre, N., Williams, D.R. & McHugh, K.E. (eds.) Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home and Identity, 145-157. CABI, Wallingford.
69. Valentine, G. 1997. Tell me about Using interviews as a research methodology. Flowerdew, R. & Martin, D. (eds.) Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project, 110-126. Longman, Harlow.
70. Valkonen, J. 2003. Lapin luontopolitiikka: Analyysi vuosien 1946-2000 julkisesta keskustelusta. Tampere University Press, Tampere.
71. Van Patten, S.R. & Williams, D.R. 2008. Problems in place: Using discursive social psychology to investigate the meanings of seasonal homes. Leisure Sciences 30, 448-464.
72. Vepsäläinen, M. & Pitkänen, K. 2010. Second home countryside: Rural representations in the Finnish second home popular discourses. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 194-204.
73. Vepsäläinen, M., Pitkänen, K. & Puhakka, R. 2009. Mökkeilijät - kansallispuistojen näkymätön sidosryhmä. Keskustelua. Terra 121, 149-151.
74. Vuori, O. 1966. Kesä huvilanomistus Suomessa: Kartoittava tutkimus kesä - asutuksesta ja huvilanomistuksesta taloudellisena ilmiönä. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series C, Tom. 3. Turun yliopisto, Turku.
75. Warren, A. 2009. Real estate trends. Global Economic Research 18 June 2009. http://www.scotiacapital.com/English/bns-econ/spretrends.pdf (accessed July 2009).
76. Williams, D.R. & Kaltenborn, B.P. 1999. Leisure places and modernity: The use and meaning of recreational cottages in Norway and the USA. Crouch, D. (ed.) Leisure/Tourism Geographies: Practices and Geographical Knowledge, 214-230. Routledge, London.
77. Williams, D.R. & Van Patten, S.R. 2006. Home and away? Creating identities and sustaining places in a multi-centred world. McIntyre, N., Williams, D.R. & McHugh, K.E. (eds.) Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home and Identity, 32-50. CABI, Wallingford.