Purification, and biochemical and biophysical characterization of cellobiohydrolase I from trichoderma harzianum IOC 3844

Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 808-817

  Colussi, Francieli ^a   Serpa, Viviane ^a   da Silva Delabona, Priscila ^a,b   Manzine, Lívia Regina ^a   Voltatódio, Maria Luiza ^a   Alves, Renata ^a   Mello, Bruno Luan ^a   Pereira Jr , Nei ^c   Farinas, Cristiane Sanches ^b   Golubev, Alexander M ^d   Santos, Maria Auxiliadora Morim ^a   Polikarpov, Igor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^d PETERSBURG NUCLEAR PHYSICS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Catalytic core domain; Cellobiohydrolase i; Identification; Purification; Trichoderma harzianum 3844

Indexed keywords

4 NITROPHENYL BETA DEXTRO CELLOBIOSIDE; CELLOBIOHYDROLASE I; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE 1,4 BETA CELLOBIOSIDASE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; PAPAIN; SEPHADEX; TRYPTOPHAN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME INDUCTION; ENZYME PURIFICATION; FERMENTATION; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FUNGAL STRAIN; HYPOCREA LIXII; ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY; ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PH; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TEMPERATURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPHYSICS; CELLULOSE 1,4-BETA-CELLOBIOSIDASE; ENZYME STABILITY; FUNGAL PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TRICHODERMA;

FUNGI; HYPOCREA LIXII;

EID: 80052277424     PISSN: 10177825     EISSN: 17388872     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1010.10037     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aboul-Enein, F. A., E. Serour, and T. Hussein. 2010. Purification and characterization of a novel thermoactive cellulase from thermophilic actinomycetes isolated from soil sample of Egypt. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2: 81-86.
2. Aden, A., M. Ruth, K. Ibsen, J. Jechura, K. Neeves, J. Sheehan, et al. 2002. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, Colorado.
3. Arantes, V. and J. N. Saddler. 2010. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotech. Biofuels 3: 1-11.
4. Bailey, S. 1994. The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50: 760-763.
5. Bakare, M. K., I. O. Adewale, A. Ajayi, A. I. Okoh, and O. O. Shonukan. 2005. Purification and characterization of cellulase from the wild-type and two improved mutants of Pseudomonas fluorescens. African J. Biotechnol. 4: 898-904.
6. Biochemistry IUo. 1961. Report of the Commission on Enzymes. Pergamon Press Oxford.
7. Biochemistry IUo. 1965. Enzyme Nomenclature: Recommendations 1964 of the International Union of Biochemistry. Elsevier. Amesterdam.
8. Boer, H., T. T. Teeri, and A. Koivula. 2000. Characterization of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase CeI7A secreted from Pichia pastoris using two different promoters. Biotech. Bioeng. 69: 486-494.
9. Bradford, M. M. 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248-254.
10. Cantarel, B. L., P. M. Coutinho, C. Rancurel, T. Bernard, V. Lombard, and B. Henrissat. 2009. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): An expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37: D233-D238.
11. Carpita, N. C. and D. M. Gibeaut. 1993. Structural models of primary-cell walls in flowering plants: Consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the wall during growth. Plant J. 3: 1-30.
12. Castro, A., M. C. Ferreira, J. Cd. Cruz, K. C. R. Pedro, D. F. Carvalho, S. G. F. Leite, and N. Pereira Jr. 2010. High-yield endoglucanase production by Trichoderma harzianum IOC-3844 cultivated in pretreated sugarcane mill byproduct. Enzyme Res. doi:10.4061/2010/854526.
13. Claeyssens, S., A. Lavoinne, M. Freselragot, B. Bois-Joyeux, M. Chanez, and J. Peret. 1990. Metabolic changes in rats fed a low protein-diet during post-weaning growth. Metabol. Clin. Exp. 39: 676-681.
14. Cosgrove, D. J. 2005. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nature Rev Molec. Cell Biol. 6: 850-861.
15. Davies, G. and B. Henrissat. 1995. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure 3: 853-859.
16. Deshpande, M. V., K. E. Eriksson, and L. G. Pettersson. 1984. An assay for selective determination of exo-1,4,-beta-glucanase in a mixture of cellulolytic enzymes. Anal. Biochem. 138: 481-487.
17. Divne, C., J. Stahlberg, T. Reinikainen, L. Ruohonen, G. Petterson, J. K. C. Knowles, et al. 1994. The 3-dimensional crystal-structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase-I from Trichoderma reesei. Science 265: 524-528.
18. Divne, C., J. Stahlberg, T. T. Teeri, and J. T. Alwyn. 1998. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 angstrom long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J. Molec. Biol. 275: 309-325.
19. Eftink, M. R. 2000. Use of fluorescence spectroscopy as thermodynamics tool. Energ. Biol. Macromolec. 323: 459-473.
20. Fischer, H., M. Oliveira Neto, H. B. Napolitano, I. Polikarpov, and A. Craievich. 2010. The molecular weight of protein in solution can be determined for a single SAXS measurement on a relative scale. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43: 101-109.
21. Gama, F. M., J. A. Teixeira, and M. Mota. 1994. Cellulose morphology and enzymatic reactivity: A modified solute exclusion technique. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 43: 381-387.
22. Gusakov, A. V., A. P. Sinitsyn, T. N. Salanovich, F. E. Bukhtojarov, A. V. Markov, B. B. Ustinov, et al. 2005. Purification, cloning and characterisation of two forms of thermostable and highly active cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) produced by the industrial strain of Chrysosporium lucknowense. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 36: 57-69.
23. Hammersley, A. P. 1997. FIT2D: An Introduction and Overview. ESRF Internal Report.
24. Henrissat, B. 1991. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino-acid-sequence similarities. Biochem. J. 280: 309-316.
25. Henrissat, B. 1994. Cellulases and their interaction with cellulose. Cellulose 1: 169-196.
26. Henrissat, B. and A. Bairoch. 1993. New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino-acid-sequence similarities. Biochem. J. 293: 781-788.
27. Himmel, M. E., S. Y. Ding, D. K. Johnson, W. S. Adney, M. R. Nimlos, J. W. Brady, and T. D. Foust. 2007. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 316: 804-807.
28. Irwin, D. C., M. Spezio, L. P. Walker, D. B. Wilson. 1993. Activity studies of 8 purified cellulases: Specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 42: 1002-1013.
29. Jager, G., Z. J. Wu, K. Garschhammer, P. Engel, T. Klement, R. Rinaldi, et al. 2010. Practical screening of purified cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases with alpha-cellulose and specification of hydrodynamics. Biotechnol. Biofuels 3: 18.
30. Jeoh, T., W. Michener, M. E. Himmel, S. R. Decker, and W. S. Adney. 2008. Implications of cellobiohydrolase glycosylation for use in biomass conversion. Biotechnol. Biofuels 1: 10.
31. Kraulis, P. J., G. M. Clore, M. Nilges, T. A. Jones, G. Pettersson, J. Knowles, and A. M. Gronenborn. 1989. Determination of the 3-dimensional solutions structure of the C-terminal domain of cellobiohydrolase-I from Trichoderma reesei: A study using nuclear magnetic ressonance and hybrid distance geometry dynamical simulated annealing. Biochemistry 28: 7241-7257.
32. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structrural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-691.
33. Lahjouji, K., R. Storms, Z. Xiao, K. B. Joung, Y. Zheng, J. Powlowski, et al. 2007. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a cellobiohydrolase from Trametes versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75: 337-346.
34. Mandels, M. and J. Weber. 1969. Production of cellulases. Adv. Chem. Series 95: 391-398.
35. Mansfield, S. D., C. Mooney, and J. N. Saddler. 1999. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Progress 15: 804-816.
36. Margeot, A., B. Hahn-Hagerdal, M. Edlund, R. Slade, F. Monot, et al. 2009. New improvements for lignocellulosic ethanol. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20: 372-380.
37. Munoz, I. G., W. Ubhayasekera, H. Henriksson, I. Szabo, G. Pettersson, G. Johansson, et al. 2001. Family 7 cellobiohydrolases from Phanerochaete chrysosporium: Crystal structure of the catalytic module of Cel7D (CBH58) at 1.32 angstrom resolution and homology models of the isozymes. J. Molecul. Biol. 314: 1097-1111.
38. Nieves, R. A., C. I. Ehrman, W. S. Adney, R. T. Elander, and M. E. Himmel. 1998. Survey and analysis of commercial cellulase preparations suitable for biomass conversion to ethanol. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 301-304.
39. Pollastri, G. and A. McLysaght. 2005. Porter: A new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 21: 1719-1720.
40. Prasad, S., A. Singh, and H. C. Joshi. 2007. Ethanol as an alternative fuel from agricultural, industrial and urban residues. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 50: 1-39.
41. Raghothama, S., P. J. Simpson, L. Szabo, T. Nagy, H. Gilbert, and M. P. Williamson. 2000. Solution structure of the CBM10 cellulose binding module from Pseudomonas xylanase A. Biochemistry 39: 978-984.
42. Shin, K., Y. H. Kim, M. Jeya, J. K. Lee, and Y. S. Kim. 2010. Purification and characterization of a thermostable cellobiohydrolase from Fomitopsis pinicola. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20: 1681-1688.
43. Sreerama, N. and R. W. Woody. 2000. Estimation of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra: Comparison of CONTIN, SELCON, and CDSSTR methods with an expanded reference set. Anal. Biochem. 287: 252-260.
44. Stahlberg, J., C. Divne, A. Koivula, K. Piens, M. Claeyssens, T. T. Teeri, et al. 1996. Activity studies and crystal structures of catalytically deficient mutants of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. J. Molec. Biol. 264: 337-349.
45. Stahlberg, J., G. Johansson, and G. Pettersson. 1991. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the 2-domains structure of cellobiohydrolase-I. Biotechnology 9: 286-290.
46. Stals, I., K. Sandra, S. Geysens, R. Contreras, J. Van Beeumen, M. Claeyssens, et al. 2004. Factors influencing glycosylation of Trichoderma reesei cellulases. I: Postsecretorial changes of the O-and N-glycosylation pattern of Cel7A. Glycobiology 14: 713-724.
47. Tarentino, A. L. and T. H. Plummer Jr. 1994. Deglycosylation of asparagine-linked glycans: Purification, properties, and specificity of oligosaccharide-cleaving enzymes from Flavobacterium meningosepticum. Methods Enz. 230: 44-57.
48. Teeri, T. T. 1997. Crystalline cellulose degradation: New insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases. Trends Biotechnol. 15: 160-167.
49. Teeri, T. T., A. Koivula, T. Reinikainen, L. Ruohonen, M. Srisodsuk, C. Divne, et al. 1994. Hydrolysis of crystaline cellulose by native and engineered Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Abstr. Papers Am. Chem. Soc. 207: 21-AGFD.
50. Valaskova, V. and P. Baldrian. 2006. Degradation of cellulose and hemicelluloses by the brown rot fungus Piptoporus betulinus: Production of extracellular enzymes and characterization of the major cellulases. Microbiology 152: 3613-3622.
51. von Ossowski, I., J. Stahlberg, A. Koivula, K. Piens, D. Becker, H. Boer, et al. 2003. Engineering the exo-loop of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase, Ce17A. A comparison with Phanerochaete chrysosporium Cel7D. J. Molec. Biol. 333: 817-829.
52. Wang, L. S., J. Liu, Y. Z. Zhang, Y. Zhao, and P. J. Gao. 2003. Comparison of domains function between cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I from Trichoderma pseudokoningii S-38 by limited proteolysis. J. Molec. Catal. B Enzymatic 24: 27-38.
53. Wolfenden, R. and M. J. Snider. 2001. The depth of chemical time and the power of enzymes as catalysts. Accounts Chem. Res. 34: 938-945.
54. Wood, T. M. and K. M. Bhat. 1988. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods Enz. 160: 87-112.
55. Wu, S. T., J. Skolnick, and Y. Zhang. 2007. Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol. 5: 17.
56. Zhang, Y. H. P., M. E. Himmel, and J. R. Mielenz. 2006. Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 24: 452-481.
57. Zhang, Y. H. P. and L. R. Lynd. 2004. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 88: 797-824.
58. Zhou, J., Y. H. Wang, J. Chu, Y. P. Zhuang, S. L. Zhang, and P. Yin. 2008. Identification and purification of the main components of cellulases from a mutant strain of Trichoderma viride T 100-14. Bioresour. Technol. 99: 6826-6833.