Angina pectoris: Relation of epidemiological survey to registry data

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 621-626

  Lallukka, Tea ^a   Manderbacka, Kristiina ^b   Keskimäki, Ilmo ^b,c   Hemingway, Harry ^d   Rahkonen, Ossi ^a   Lahelma, Eero ^a   Antti, Reunanen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Angina; coronary heart disease; registries; Rose Questionnaire; validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; DISEASE REGISTRY; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; THORAX PAIN;

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; CARDIOVASCULAR AGENTS; CORONARY DISEASE; DRUG COSTS; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH, REIMBURSEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT ADMISSION; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SELF REPORT; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80052270370     PISSN: 20474873     EISSN: 20474881     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32833bfc73     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rose GA. Ischemic heart disease. Chest pain questionnaire. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1965; 43: 32–39.
2. Bottomley A. Methodology for assessing the prevalence of angina in primary care using practice based information in northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 87–89.
3. Zaher C, Goldberg GA, Kadlubek P. Estimating angina prevalence in a managed care population. Am J Manag Care 2004; 10(suppl 11): 339–346.
4. Bodegard J, Erikssen G, Bjornholt JV, Thelle D, Erikssen J. Possible angina detected by the WHO angina questionnaire in apparently healthy men with a normal exercise ECG: coronary heart disease or not? A 26 year follow-up study. Heart 2004; 90: 627–632.
5. Owen-Smith V, Hannaford PC, Elliott AM. Increased mortality among women with Rose angina who have not presented with ischaemic heart disease. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53: 784–789.
6. Cook DG, Shaper AG, MacFarlane PW. Using the WHO (Rose) angina questionnaire in cardiovascular epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 1989; 18: 607–613.
7. Oei HH, Vliegenthart R, Deckers JW, Hofman A, Oudkerk M, Witteman JC. The association of Rose questionnaire angina pectoris and coronary calcification in a general population: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. Ann Epidemiol 2004; 14: 431–436.
8. Sorlie PD, Cooper L, Schreiner PJ, Rosamond W, Szklo M. Repeatability and validity of the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 719–725.
9. Ruigómez A, Rodriguez LA, Wallander MA, Johansson S, Jones R. Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 167–174.
10. Hemingway H, Langenberg C, Damant J, Frost C, Pyorälä K, Barrett-Connor E. Prevalence of angina in women versus men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of international variations across 31 countries. Circulation 2008; 117: 1526–1536.
11. Lahelma E, Martikainen P, Rahkonen O, Roos E, Saastamoinen P. Occupational class inequalities across key domains of health: results from the Helsinki Health Study. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 504–510.
12. Lallukka T, Chandola T, Hemingway H, Marmot M, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O. Job strain and symptoms of angina pectoris among British and Finnish middle-aged employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009; 63: 980–985.
13. Lallukka T, Martikainen P, Reunanen A, Roos E, Sarlio-Lähteenkorva S, Lahelma E. Associations between working conditions and angina pectoris symptoms among employed women. Psychosom Med 2006; 68: 348–354.
14. Laaksonen M, Aittomäki A, Lallukka T, Rahkonen O, Saastamoinen P, Silventoinen K, et al. Register-based study among employees showed small nonparticipation bias in health surveys and check-ups. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 900–906.
15. Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley M, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P, Keskimäki I. Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA 2006; 295: 1404–1411.
16. Hemingway H, Shipley M, Britton A, Page M, Macfarlane P, Marmot M. Prognosis of angina with and without a diagnosis: 11 year follow up in the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327: 895–899.
17. Nicholson A, White I, Macfarlane P, Brunner E, Marmot M, Rose. questionnaire angina in younger men and women: gender differences in the relationship to cardiovascular risk factors and other reported symptoms. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 337–346.
18. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, Saab PG, Kubzansky L. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 637–651.
19. Mähönen M, Salomaa V, Brommels M, Molarius A, Miettinen H, Pyörälä K, et al. The validity of hospital discharge register data on coronary heart disease in Finland. Eur J Epidemiol 1997; 13: 403–415.
20. Pajunen P, Koukkunen H, Ketonen M, Jerkkola T, Immonen-Räihä P, Kärjä-Koskenkari P, et al. The validity of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register and Causes of Death Register data on coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005; 12: 132–137.
21. Leppälä JM, Virtamo J, Heinonen OP. Validation of stroke diagnosis in the National Hospital Discharge Register and the Register of Causes of Death in Finland. Eur J Epidemiol 1999; 15: 155–160.
22. Cannon PJ, Connell PA, Stockley IH, Garner ST, Hampton JR. Prevalence of angina as assessed by a survey of prescriptions for nitrates. Lancet 1988; 331: 979–981.
23. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.
24. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 2000; 2nd ed. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.