Repeatability and validity of the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 719-725

  Sorlie, Paul D ^a   Cooper, Lawton ^a   Schreiner, Pamela J ^b   Rosamond, Wayne ^b   Szklo, Moyses ^c  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Angina pectoris; Atherosclerosis; Repeatability; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTERY WALL; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; B SCAN; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CAROTID ARTERY; CAUCASIAN; CIGARETTE SMOKING; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEGRO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; THICKNESS; THORAX PAIN; WALKING;

EID: 0030197936     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00022-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1. Heberden W. Some account of a disorder of the breast. Med Trans R Coll Physicians Lond 1772; 2: 59-67.
2. 2. Schofield PM, Whorwell PJ, Jones PE, Brooks NH, Bennett DH. Differentiation of "esophageal" and "cardiac" chest pain. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 315-316.
3. 3. Tibbling L. Oesophageal dysfunction and angina pectoris in a Swedish population selected at random. Acta Med Scand 1981; 644(Suppl.): 71-74.
4. 4. Hlatky MA, Mark DB, Califf RM, Pryor DB. Angina, myocardial ischemia and coronary disease: Gold standards, operational definitions and correlations. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 381-384.
5. 5. Blackwelder WC, Kagan A, Gordon T, Rhoads GG. Comparison of methods for diagnosing angina pectoris: The Honolulu Heart Study. Int J Epidemiol 1981; 10: 211-215.
6. 6. Erikssen J, Kolbjorn F, Storstein O. Angina pectoris in presumably healthy middle-aged men: Validation of two questionnaire methods in making the diagnosis of angina pectoris. Eur J Cardiol 1977; 6: 285-298.
7. 7. Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976; 54: 522-523.
8. 8. Rose GA, Blackburn H, Gillum RF, et al. Cardiovascular Survey Methods. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1982.
9. 9. Rose GA. Chest pain questionnaire. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1965; 43: 32-39.
10. 10. Rose G. Variability of angina: Some implications for epidemiology. Br J Prev Soc Med 1968; 22: 12-15.
11. 11. The ARIC Investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: Design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 687-702.
12. 12. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Frederickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18: 499-502.
13. 13. Brown SA, Hutchinson R, Morrisett J, Boerwinkle E, Davis CE, Gotto AM Jr, Patsch W. Plasma lipid, lipoprotein cholesterol, and apoprotein distributions in selected US communities. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Arterioscler Thromb 1993; 13: 1139-1158.
14. 14. Heiss G, Sharrett AR, Barnes R, Chambless LE, Szklo M, Alzola C. Carotid atherosclerosis measured by B-mode ultrasound in populations: Associations with cardiovascular risk factors in the ARIC Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 250-256.
15. 15. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973.
16. 16. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 423-429.
17. 17. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG, Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1980.
18. 18. LaCroix AZ, Haynes SG, Savage DD, Havlik RJ. Rose questionnaire angina among United States black, white, and Mexican-American women and men. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 669-686.
19. 19. Wilcosky T, Harris T, Weissfeld L. The prevalence and correlates of Rose questionnaire angina among women and men in Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study population. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 400-409.
20. 20. Kannel WB, Sorlie PD. Remission of clinical angina pectoris: The Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol 1978; 42: 119-123.
21. 21. Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB. Survival Following Initial Cardiovascular Events: 30 Year Follow-Up. Section 30, The Framingham Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease. NIH Publ. No. 88-2969. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 1988.
22. 22. Weinblatt W, Shapiro S, Frank CW. Prognosis of women with newly diagnosed coronary heart disease - a comparison with course of disease among men. Am J Public Health 1973; 63: 577-593.
23. 23. Harris RB, Weissfeld LA. Gender differences in the reliability of reporting symptoms of angina pectoris. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1071-1078.
24. 24. Bass EB, Follansbee WP, Orchard TJ. Comparison of a supplemented Rose questionnaire to exercise thallium testing in men and women. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 385-393.
25. 25. Garber CE, Carleton RA, Heller GV. Comparison of "Rose questionnaire angina" to exercise thallium scintigraphy: Different findings in males and females. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 715-720.
26. 26. Friedman LM, Byington RP. Assessment of angina pectoris after myocardial infarction: Comparison of "Rose questionnaire" with physician judgment in the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 555-562.
27. 27. Heyden S, Bartel AG, Tabesh E, Cassel JC, Tyroler HA, Cornoni JC, Hames CG. Angina pectoris and the Rose questionnaire. Arch Intern Med 1971; 128: 961-964.