Complications of percutaneous procedures

American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 802-810

  Chen, Esther H ^a   Nemeth, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILIARY TRACT DRAINAGE; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; COMPLICATION; GASTROSTOMY; HUMAN; KIDNEY BIOPSY; LIVER BIOPSY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; PERCUTANEOUS PROCEDURE; PERCUTANEOUS RADIOLOGICAL GASTROSTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSJUGULAR INTRAHEPATIC PORTOSYSTEMIC SHUNT; URETER STENT; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; VASCULAR ACCESS; VENA CAVA FILTER;

BIOPSY; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; GASTROSTOMY; HUMANS; KIDNEY; LIVER; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PORTASYSTEMIC SHUNT, TRANSJUGULAR INTRAHEPATIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; VENA CAVA FILTERS;

EID: 80052248097     PISSN: 07356757     EISSN: 15328171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.010     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Guidelines for establishing a quality assurance program in vascular and interventional radiology J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 9 Pt 2 2003 S203 S207
2. Bogart M.A. Time to hemostasis: a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery Am J Crit Care 4 2 1995 149 156
3. Pannu N., Wiebe N., and Tonelli M. Prophylaxis strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy JAMA 295 23 2006 2765 2779
4. Finn W.F. The clinical and renal consequences of contrast-induced nephropathy Nephrol Dial Transplant 21 6 2006 i2 i10
5. Miller D.L., Balter S., and Cole P.E. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. Part II: Skin dose J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 8 2003 977 990 (Pubitemid 36959515)
6. Berczi V., Bottomley J.R., and Thomas S.M. Long-term retrievability of IVC filters: should we abandon permanent devices? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30 5 2007 820 827 (Pubitemid 47497882)
7. Grassi C.J., Swan T.L., and Cardella J.F. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous permanent inferior vena cava filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 9 Pt 2 2003 S271 S275
8. Ray C.E. Jr., and Kaufman J.A. Complications of inferior vena cava filters Abdom Imaging 21 4 1996 368 374 (Pubitemid 26230779)
9. Chung J., and Owen R.J. Using inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism Can Fam Physician 54 1 2008 49 55 (Pubitemid 351198353)
10. Chattar-Cora D., Tutela R.R. Jr., and Tulsyan N. Inferior vena cava filter ensnarement by central line guide wires-a report of 4 cases and brief review Angiology 55 4 2004 463 468 (Pubitemid 38924379)
11. Lee M., Kohli-Seth R., and Kelly J. A noninvasive bedside technique for retrieval of an entrapped guidewire from a vena cava filter without fluoroscopy J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 19 3 2005 362 363 (Pubitemid 40797695)
12. Teichgraber U.K., Gebauer B., and Benter T. Central venous access catheters: radiological management of complications Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26 4 2003 321 333 (Pubitemid 37128618)
13. Ray C.E. Jr Infectious complications of venous access devices Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5 2 2002 78 84 (Pubitemid 36043058)
14. Wirsing M., Schummer C., and Neumann R. Is traditional reading of the bedside chest radiograph appropriate to detect intraatrial central venous catheter position? Chest 134 3 2008 527 533
15. Lyon S.M., Given M., and Marshall N.L. Interventional radiology in the provision and maintenance of long-term central venous access J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 52 1 2008 10 17 (Pubitemid 351598467)
16. Faintuch S., and Salazar G.M. Malfunction of dialysis catheters: management of fibrin sheath and related problems Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 11 3 2008 195 200
17. Kalambokis G., Manousou P., and Vibhakorn S. Transjugular liver biopsy-indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications-a systematic review J Hepatol 47 2 2007 284 294 (Pubitemid 47021258)
18. Gamble P., Colapinto R.F., and Stronell R.D. Transjugular liver biopsy: a review of 461 biopsies Radiology 157 3 1985 589 593 (Pubitemid 16232091)
19. Colapinto R.F. Transjugular biopsy of the liver Clin Gastroenterol 14 2 1985 451 467
20. Soyer P., Fargeaudou Y., and Boudiaf M. Transjugular liver biopsy using ultrasonographic guidance for jugular vein puncture and an automated device for hepatic tissue sampling: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive cases Abdom Imaging 33 6 2008 627 632
21. Misra S., Gyamlani G., and Swaminathan S. Safety and diagnostic yield of transjugular renal biopsy J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 4 2008 546 551 (Pubitemid 351423651)
22. Cluzel P., Martinez F., and Bellin M.F. Transjugular versus percutaneous renal biopsy for the diagnosis of parenchymal disease: comparison of sampling effectiveness and complications Radiology 215 3 2000 689 693 (Pubitemid 30346001)
23. See T.C., Thompson B.C., and Howie A.J. Transjugular renal biopsy: our experience and technical considerations Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31 5 2008 906 918
24. Warlick C.A., Mouli S.K., and Allaf M.E. Bladder irrigation using hydrogen peroxide for clot evacuation Urology 68 6 2006 1331 1332 (Pubitemid 44880365)
25. Fine D.M., Arepally A., and Hofmann L.V. Diagnostic utility and safety of transjugular kidney biopsy in the obese patient Nephrol Dial Transplant 19 7 2004 1798 1802 (Pubitemid 38961390)
26. Haskal Z.J., Martin L., and Cardella J.F. Quality improvement guidelines for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 9 Pt 2 2003 S265 270
27. Freedman A.M., Sanyal A.J., and Tisnado J. Complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a comprehensive review Radiographics 13 6 1993 1185 1210
28. Sanyal A.J., Freedman A.M., and Luketic V.A. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts compared with endoscopic sclerotherapy for the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage. A randomized, controlled trial Ann Intern Med 126 11 1997 849 857
29. Boyer T.D. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of complications of portal hypertension Curr Gastroenterol Rep 10 1 2008 30 35
30. Coldwell D.M., Ring E.J., and Rees C.R. Multicenter investigation of the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in management of portal hypertension Radiology 196 2 1995 335 340
31. Sanyal A.J., Freedman A.M., and Purdum P.P. The hematologic consequences of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 23 1 1996 32 39 (Pubitemid 26012088)
32. Edwards R.D., Moss J.G., and Lumsden M.A. Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids N Engl J Med 356 4 2007 360 370 (Pubitemid 46148778)
33. Worthington-Kirsch R., Spies J.B., and Myers E.R. The Fibroid Registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: short-term outcomes Obstet Gynecol 106 1 2005 52 59 (Pubitemid 40898434)
34. Pron G., Mocarski E., and Bennett J. Tolerance, hospital stay, and recovery after uterine artery embolization for fibroids: the Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 10 2003 1243 1250 (Pubitemid 37266657)
35. Marshburn P.B., Matthews M.L., and Hurst B.S. Uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine myomas Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 33 1 2006 125 144
36. Ganguli S., Faintuch S., and Salazar G.M. Postembolization syndrome: changes in white blood cell counts immediately after uterine artery embolization J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 3 2008 443 445 (Pubitemid 351273633)
37. Kitamura Y., Ascher S.M., and Cooper C. Imaging manifestations of complications associated with uterine artery embolization Radiographics 25 Suppl 1 2005 S119 S132
38. Schermerhorn M.L., O'Malley A.J., and Jhaveri A. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population N Engl J Med 358 5 2008 464 474 (Pubitemid 351185802)
39. Lovegrove R.E., Javid M., and Magee T.R. A meta-analysis of 21,178 patients undergoing open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm Br J Surg 95 6 2008 677 684
40. Wilt T.J., Lederle F.A., and Macdonald R. Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm Evid Rep Technol Assess 144 2006 1 113
41. Gates J., Hartnell G.G., and Stuart K.E. Chemoembolization of hepatic neoplasms: safety, complications, and when to worry Radiographics 19 2 1999 399 414
42. Marelli L., Stigliano R., and Triantos C. Transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: which technique is more effective? A systematic review of cohort and randomized studies Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30 1 2007 6 25 (Pubitemid 44900485)
43. Lopez-Benitez R., Radeleff B.A., and Barragan-Campos H.M. Acute pancreatitis after embolization of liver tumors: frequency and associated risk factors Pancreatology 7 1 2007 53 62 (Pubitemid 46725722)
44. Ho S.G., Marchinkow L.O., and Legiehn G.M. Radiological percutaneous gastrostomy Clin Radiol 56 11 2001 902 910 (Pubitemid 35023829)
45. Given M.F., Hanson J.J., and Lee M.J. Interventional radiology techniques for provision of enteral feeding Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28 6 2005 692 703 (Pubitemid 41586846)
46. Silas A.M., Pearce L.F., and Lestina L.S. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patients Eur J Radiol 56 1 2005 84 90 (Pubitemid 41316492)
47. Wollman B., D'Agostino H.B., and Walus-Wigle J.R. Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature Radiology 197 3 1995 699 704
48. Burke D.T., El Shami A., and Heinle E. Comparison of gastrostomy tube replacement verification using air insufflation versus gastrograffin Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 11 2006 1530 1533 (Pubitemid 44647174)
49. Sriram K., Jayanthi V., and Lakshmi R.G. Prophylactic locking of enteral feeding tubes with pancreatic enzymes JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 21 6 1997 353 356 (Pubitemid 27505901)
50. Covey A.M., and Brown K.T. Palliative percutaneous drainage in malignant biliary obstruction. Part 2: Mechanisms and postprocedure management J Support Oncol 4 7 2006 329 335 (Pubitemid 44420135)
51. Winick A.B., Waybill P.N., and Venbrux A.C. Complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary interventions Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 4 3 2001 200 206 (Pubitemid 33032479)
52. Wu S.M., Marchant L.K., and Haskal Z.J. Percutaneous interventions in the biliary tree Semin Roentgenol 32 3 1997 228 245 (Pubitemid 27329297)
53. Yee A.C., and Ho C.S. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: a review Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 30 3 1990 247 279 (Pubitemid 20294860)
54. Gendler R., Shapiro R.S., and Mitty H.A. CT findings after percutaneous biliary procedures Radiology 187 2 1993 373 376 (Pubitemid 23127839)
55. Zagoria R.J., and Dyer R.B. Do's and don't's of percutaneous nephrostomy Acad Radiol 6 6 1999 370 377 (Pubitemid 32674960)
56. Kirkham A.P., and Ho S.G. Radiological interventions in gastrointestinal and urological oncology Semin Roentgenol 42 3 2007 191 204 (Pubitemid 46962076)
57. Dyer R.B., Chen M.Y., and Zagoria R.J. Complications of ureteral stent placement Radiographics 22 5 2002 1005 1022