The report of the International Workshop on using multi-level data from sample frames, auxiliary databases, paradata and related sources to detect and adjust for nonresponse bias in surveys

International Journal of Public Opinion Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 389-402

  Smith, Tom W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052243182     PISSN: 09542892     EISSN: 14716909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edr035     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (127)

1. Abraham, K. G., Maitland, A., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). Nonresponse in the American time use survey: Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 676-703.
2. Amaya, A., Skalland, B., & Wooten, K. (2010). What's in a match? Survey Practice.
3. Bethlehem, J. G. (2002). Weighting nonresponse adjustments based on auxiliary information. In R. M. Groves, et al. (Eds.), Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Bethlehem, J., Cobben, F., & Schouten, B. (2011). Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Biemer, P., & Peytchev, A. (2011, June). Nonresponse Bias Correction in Telephone Surveys Using Census Geocoding: An Evaluation of Error Properties. Chicago, IL, USA: Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys.
6. Billiet, J. (2009). Non-response bias in cross-national surveys: Design for detection and adjustment in the ESS. ASK: Research and Methods, 18, 3-43.
7. Blom, A. G. (2009). Nonresponse bias adjustments: What can process data contribute? ISER Working Paper 2009-21, University of Essex.
8. Bruce, A., & Robinson, G. J. (n.d.). Tract Level Planning Database with Census 2000 Data. Washington, DC: Census Bureau.
9. Cantor, D., & Cunningham, P. (2002). Methods for obtaining high response rates in telephone surveys. In C. Citro, et al. (Eds.), Studies of Welfare Populations: Data Collection and Research Issues. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Casas-Cordero, C. (2010). Neighborhood characteristics and participation in household surveys. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
11. Cho, Y. I. (2007, March). Using Community-level Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Surveys. Paper presented to the C-AAPOR Workshop on Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys.
12. Christian, L., Dimock, M., & Keeter, S. (2009, July). Accurately Locating where Wireless Respondents Live Requires more than a Phone Number. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
13. Cobben, F. (2009). Nonresponse in Sample Surveys: Methods for Analysis and Adjustment. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands.
14. Cobben, F., & Schouten, B. (2008). An empirical validation of R-indicators. Discussion Paper 08006: Statistics Netherlands.
15. Cobben, F., & Schouten, B. (2007). A follow-up with basic questions of nonrespondents to the Dutch Labour Force Survey. Discussion Paper 07011. Statistics Netherlands.
16. Conrad, F., Broome, J., Benki, J., Groves, R., Kreuter, F., & Vannette, D. (2010, May). To Agree or Not to Agree? Impact of Interviewer Speech on Survey Participation Decisions. Paper presented to the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
17. Couper, M. P., & de Leeuw, E. (2003). Nonresponse in cross-cultural and cross-national surveys. In J. Harkness, F. J. R. van de Vijver & P. Ph. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-Cultural Survey Methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Couper, M. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2005, April). The use of paradata in survey research. Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute, Sydney, Australia.
19. D'Arrigo, J., Durrant, G. B., & Steele, F. (2011). Analysing the Process Leading to Cooperation or Refusal Using Call Record Data: A Multilevel Multinominal Modeling Approach. Unpublished paper, University of Southampton.
20. Davern, M. (2006, November). Evaluating Linked Survey and Administrative Data for Policy Research. Paper presented to the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Washington, DC, USA.
21. Davern, M., Klerman, J. A., Ziegenfuss, J., Lynch, V., Baugh, D., & Greenberg, G. (2009). A partially corrected estimate of medicaid enrollment and uninsurance: Results from an imputational model developed off linked survey and administrative data. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 34, 219-240.
22. De Leeuw, E., & de Heer, W. (2002). Trends in household nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In R. M. Groves, et al. (Eds.), Survey Nonresponse. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Dennis, J. M. (2011, June). Using Ancillary Data Available for Address-Based Sampling to Measure Self-Selection Bias. Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
24. DiSogra, C. (2010). The Promise of Address-based Sampling Using Ancillary Information Knowledge Networks.
25. DiSogra, C., Dennis, J. M., & Fahimi, M. (2010, August). On Quality of Ancillary Data Available forAddress-Based Sampling. Vancouver: Paper presented to the American Statistical Association.
26. Dixon, J. (2004, August). Using Census Match Data to Evaluate Models of Survey Nonresponse. Toronto, Canada: Paper presented to the American Statistical Association.
27. Durrant, G. B., et al. (2010). Effects of interviewer attitudes and behaviors in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 1-36.
28. Durrant, G. B., D'Arrigo, J., & Steele, F. (2011). Using field process data to predict best times of contact conditioning on household and interviewer influences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, forthcoming.
29. Durrant, G. B., & Steele, F. (2009). Multivariate modelling of refusal and non-contact in household surveys: Evidence from six UK government surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 1972, 361-381.
30. English, N., Schwartz, L., & Goble, L. (2010, May). Where, Exactly, Are the RDD Non-respondents: A GIS-Based Approach to Quantifying Potential Bias. Paper presented to the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Florida, USA.
31. Fone, D. L., Lloyd, K., & Dunstan, F. D. (2007). Measuring the neighbourhood using UK benefits data: A multivariate analysis of mental health status. BMC Public Health, 7, 69ff.
32. Foster, K. (1998). Evaluating non-response on household surveys: Report of a study linked to the 1991 Census. Government Statistical Service Methodology Series No. 8, Office of National Statistics.
33. Fraboni, R., Rosina, A., Orsini, S., & Baldazzi, B. (2005). A micro analysis of the macros differences in refusal risk among metropolitan areas: The case of the Italian multipurpose survey. Statistical Methods & Applications, 14, 283-295. (Pubitemid 41521324)
34. Freeth, S., White, A., & Martin, J. (2001). Using matched census-survey records to evaluate the quality of survey data. Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium. Ottawa, Canada.
35. Garrett, J., Dennis, J. M., & DiSogra, C. (2010). Non-Response Bias: Recent Findings from Addressed-based panel recruitment. Knowledge Networks Report.
36. Goodman, A., & Gatward, R. (2008). "Who are we missing?" Area deprivation and survey participation. European Journal of Epidemiology, 23, 379-387.
37. Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.
38. Groves, R. M., Brick, J. M., Couper, M., Kalsbeek, W., Harris-Kojetin, B., Kreuter, F., Pennell, B., Raghunathan, T., Schouten, B., Smith, T., Tourangeau, R., Bowers, A., Jans, M., Kennedy, C., Levenstein, R., Olson, K., Peytcheva, E., Ziniel, S., & Wagner, J. (2008, October). Alternative Practical Measures of Representativeness of Survey Respondent Pools. Survey Practice, 1, Retrieved from http://surveypractice.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/ survey-practice-october-2008.pdf.
39. Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
40. Groves, R. M., et al. (2008). Responsive design for household surveys: illustration of management interventions based on survey paradata. Unpublished report. University of Michigan.
41. Groves, R. M., & Heeringa, S. G. (2006). Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey nonresponse and costs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169, 439-457. (Pubitemid 43877176)
42. Groves, R., Wagner, J., & Peytcheva, E. (2007). Use of interviewer judgments about attributes of selected respondents in post-survey adjustments for unit nonresponse: An illustration with the national survey of family growth. Proceedings of the Section on Surveys Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA: ASA.
43. Guterbock, T. M., Hubbard, R. A., & Holian, L. M. (2006). Community attachment as a predictors of survey non-response. Unpublished report. University of Virginia.
44. Hansen, S. E. (2008). CATI sample management systems. In J. M. Lepkowski, et al. (Eds.), Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
45. Herzog, T. N., Scheuren, F., & Winkler, W. E. (2007). Data Quality and Record Linkage Techniques. New York, NY: Springer.
46. Jenkins, S. P., Lynn, P., Jaekle, A., & Sala, E. (2007). The feasibility of linking household survey and administrative record data: New evidence from Britain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 29-43.
47. Johnson, P. (2010, June). Comparing ABS vs. landline RDD sampling frames on the phone mode. Survey Practice.
48. Johnson, T. P., Lee, G., & Cho, Y. I. (2010, June). Examining the association between cultural environments and survey nonresponse. Survey Practice.
49. Johnson, T. P., Cho, Y. I., Campbell, R. T., & Holbrook, A. L. (2006). Using community-level correlates to evaluate nonresponse effects in a telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 704-719.
50. Johnson, T. P., Holbrook, A. L., Cho, Y. I., & Bossarte, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse error in injury-risk surveys. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31, 427-436. (Pubitemid 44528936)
51. Joye, D., Staehli, M. E., Pollien, A., & Sapin, M. (2011, June). A Geography of Non-response? Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys, Chicago, IL, USA
52. Kawachi, I. & Berkman, L. F. (Eds.) (2003). Neighborhoods and Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53. Kennickell, A., Mulrow, E., & Scheuren, F. (2011, June). Paradata or Process Modeling for Inference. Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys, Chicago, IL, USA.
54. King, J., & Foster, K. (1998, July). Understanding household survey non-response through geo-demographic coding schemes. Survey Methodology Bulletin, 43, 28-35.
55. Kreuter, F. The nonresponse challenge. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, forthcoming.
56. Kreuter, F. (2009). Survey methodology: International developments. RatSWD Working Paper No. 59. German Council for Social and Economic Data.
57. Kreuter, F., & Casas-Cordero, C. (2010). Paradata. RatSWD Working Paper No. 136. German Council for Social and Economic Data.
58. Kreuter, F., & Kohler, U. (2009). Analyzing contact sequences in call record data: Potential and limitations of sequence indicators for nonresponse adjustments in the european social survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 25, 203-226.
59. Kreuter, F., Lemay, M., & Casas-Cordero, C. (2007, August). Using proxy measures of survey outcomes in post-survey adjustments: Examples from the European Social Survey (ESS). Paper presented to the American Statistical Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
60. Kreuter, F., Olson, K., Wagner, J., Yan, T., Ezzati-Rice, T. M., & Casas-Cordero, C. (2010). Using proxy measures and other correlates of survey outcomes to adjust for non-response: Examples from multiple surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 173, 389-407.
61. Kreuter, F., Mueller, G., & Trappmann, M. (2010). Nonresponse and measurement error in employment research: Making use of administrative data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 880-906.
62. Kreuter, F., & Olson, K. (2011). Multiple auxiliary variables in nonresponse adjustment. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 311-332.
63. Laflamme, F., Maydan, M., & Miller, A. (2008). Using paradata to actively manage data collection survey process. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA: ASA.
64. Lee, S., Brown, R., Grant, D., Belin, T. R., & Brick, J. M. (2009). Exploring nonresponse bias in a health survey using neighborhood characteristics. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 1811-1817.
65. Linn, I., & Schaeffer, N. C. (1995). Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipants. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 236-258.
66. Link, M. W. (2010, November). Address based sampling: What do we know so far? American Statistical Association Webinar.
67. Lynn, P. (2002). PEDAKSI: Methodology for collecting data about survey non-respondents. Working Paper for the Institute for Social and Economic Research, 2002-05, University of Essex.
68. Lynn, P., Clarke, P., Martin, J., & Sturgis, P. (2002). The effect of extended interviewer efforts on nonresponse bias. In R. M. Groves, et al. (Eds.), Survey nonresponse. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
69. Lynn, P., & Nicolas, G. (2010). Making good use of survey paradata. Survey Practice, 3, Retrieved from .http://surveypractice.org/2010/04/14/making- good-use-of-survey-paradata/
70. Maitland, A., Casas Cordero, C., & Kreuter, F. (2008, August). An exploration into the use of para data for nonresponse adjustment in a health survey. Paper presented to the American Statistical Association, Denver, CO, USA.
71. Martikainen, P., Laaksonen, M., Piha, K., & Lallukka, T. (2007). Does survey non-response bias the association between occupational social class and health? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 23, 212-215. (Pubitemid 46567467)
72. Matsuo, H., & Loosveldt, G. (2010, May). ESS Round 5: Contact forms & interviewer training for observable data. Paper presented to the ESS National Coordinator's Meeting, The Hague.
73. Matsuo, H., Billiet, J., Loosveldt, G., Berglund, F., & Kleven, O. (2010a). Measurement and adjustment of non-response bias based on non-response surveys: The case of Belgium and Norway in the European Social Survey Round 3. Survey Research Methods, 4, 165-178.
74. Matsuo, H., Billiet, J., Loosveldt, G., & Malnar, B. (2010b). Respondent-based quality assessment of ESS Round 4: Results for 30 countries based on contact files. Final report. Centrum voor Sociologisch Onderzoek.
75. Mohl, C., & Laflamme, F. (2007). Research and responsive design options for survey data collection at statistics Canada. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: ASA.
76. Mulrow, E., & English, N. (2011, April). Combining survey and administrative information. Paper presented to the NORC Open House, Chicago, IL, USA.
77. Nicoletti, C., & Peracchi, F. (2005). Survey response and survey characteristics: Microlevel evidence from the European community household panel. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 168, 763-781. (Pubitemid 41452732)
78. Olson, K. (2007). An investigation of the nonresponse-measurement error nexus. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
79. Olson, K.Paradata in nonresponse adjustment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, forthcoming.
80. Olson, K. (2006). Survey participation, nonresponse bias, measurement error bias, and total bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 737-758.
81. Olson, K., & Witt, L. (2011, March). Are we keeping the people who used to stay? Changes in correlates of panel survey attrition over time. Social Science Research, [Epub ahead of print; doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.03.001].
82. Olson, K., & Groves, R. M. (2010, June). An examination of within-person variation in response propensity over the data collection field period. Journal of Official Statistics, Paper accepted with minor revisions.
83. Olson, K., Wood, H., & Smyth, J. (2010, May). Does providing respondents with their preferred survey mode really increase participation? Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research annual meeting, Chicago, IL, USA
84. O'Muircheartaigh, C., & Campenelli, P. (1999). A multilevel exploration of the role of interviewers in survey non-response. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 162, 437-446.
85. Paul, J., & Grady, S. (2010). Summary of ADDRESS BASED SAMPLING PAPERS from 2009 AAPOR Conference. Survey Practice, 3, Retrieved from http://surveypractice.org/2010/04/14/summary-ofaddress-based-sampling-papers/.
86. Peytchev, A., & Olson, K. (2007, August). Using interviewer observations to improve nonresponse adjustments: NES 2004. Paper Presented to the American Statistical Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
87. Peytchev, A., Riley, S., Rosen, J., Murphy, J., & Lindblad, M. (2010). Reduction of nonresponse bias in surveys through case prioritization. Survey Research Methods, 4, 21-29.
88. Safir, A., Steinbach, R., Triplett, T., & Wang, K. (2002). Effects on survey estimates from reducing nonresponse. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. Washington, DC: ASA.
89. Salvo, J. J., & Lobo, A. P. (2003, August). The effect of neighborhood characteristics on nonresponse in the Bronx test site of the American community survey. Paper presented to the American Statistical Association, San Francisco, CA, USA.
90. Salvo, J. J., & Lobo, A. P. (2006). Moving from a decennial census to a continuous measurement survey: Factors affecting nonresponse at the neighborhood level. Population Research Policy Review, 25, 225-241. (Pubitemid 44822741)
91. Sarndal, C., & Lundstrom, S. (2008). Accessing auxiliary vectors for control of nonresponse bias in the calibration estimator. Journal of Official Statistics, 24, 167-191.
92. Sarndal, C., & Lundstrom, S. (2005). Estimation in surveys with nonresponse. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
93. Sastry, N., & Pebley, A. R. (2003). Non-response in the Los Angeles family and neighborhood survey. Labor and Population Program Working Paper Series 03-1, Rand.
94. Schnell, R., & Kreuter, F. (2005). Separating interviewer and sample-point effects. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 389-410.
95. Schouten, B. (2007). A follow-up of nonresponse in the Dutch labour force survey. Discussion Paper 07004, Statistics Netherlands.
96. Schouten, B., Cobben, F., & Bethlehem, J. (2009). Indicators for the representativeness of survey response. Survey Methodology, 35, 101-113.
97. Shen, M., Cozen, W., Huang, L., Colt, J., DeRoss, A. J., & Severson, R. K. (2008). Census and geographic differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 350-361. (Pubitemid 351197584)
98. Skalland, B. J., & Blumberg, S. J. (2008). Nonresponse bias analysis: 2005-06 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. NORC report.
99. Skalland, B. J., & Blumberg, S. J.Nonresponse in the National Survey of Children's Health, 2007. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, forthcoming.
100. Smith, T. W. (2010, September). Contextualizing social-science data. SBE 2020 White Paper. National Science Foundation.
101. Smith, T. W. (2007). Survey non-response procedures in cross-national perspective: The 2005 ISSP non-response survey. Survey Research Methods, 1, 45-54.
102. Smith, T. W., & Kim, J. (2009). An assessment of the multi-level integrated database approach. GSS Methodological Report No. 116. Chicago, IL: NORC.
103. Smith, T. W., & Sokolowski, J. (2011). Using audio-visuals in surveys. In S. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104. Staehli, M. E. (2011, April/May). Examples and experiences from the Swiss Interviewer training on observable data (NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS) for ESS 2010 (R5). Paper presented to the National Coordinators Meeting, Mannheim.
105. Steeh, C., & Piekarski, L. (2008). Accommodating new technologies: Mobile and VoIP communication. In J. M. Lepkowski, et al. (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
106. Steele, F., & Durrant, G. B. (2009). Alternative approaches to multilevel modeling of survey noncontact and refusal. Working Paper M09/15, University of Southampton.
107. Stoop, I. A. L. (2005). The hunt for the last respondent: Nonresponse in sample surveys. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands.
108. Stoop, I., Billiet, J., Koch, A., & Fitzgerlad, R. (2010a). Improving survey response: Lessons learned from the European Social Survey. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
109. Stoop, I., Matsuo, H., Koch, A., & Billiet, J. (2010b, August). Paradata in the European Social Survey: Studying nonresponse and adjusting for bias. Vancouver: Paper presented to the American Statistical Association.
110. Stoop, I., Matsuo, H., Billiet, J., & Koch, A. (2011, June). The use of paradata (and other auxiliary data) for nonresponse adjustment in the European Social Survey (ESS). Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys, Chicago, IL, USA.
111. Stoop, I., Billiet, J., & Vehovar, V. (2009, August). Nonresponse bias in a cross-national study. Durban, South Africa: Paper presented to the International Statistical Institute.
112. Sturgis, P. (2011, June). Nonresponse, paradata, and causal inference. Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys, Chicago.
113. Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., & Williams, J. (2011, June). Is skill in obtaining contact and cooperation correlated with the magnitude of interviewer variance? Paper presented to the International Workshop on Using Multi-level Data from Sample Frames, Auxiliary Databases, Paradata and Related Sources to Detect and Adjust for Nonresponse Bias in Surveys, Chicago, IL, USA.
114. Trappmann, M., & Mueller, G. (2010). Paradata and linked administrative data of the PASS panel. Institute for Employment Research, University of Southampton.
115. Triplett, T., & Abi-Habib, N. (2005, November). Socio-demographic study of telephone nonrespondents. Paper presented to the FCSM Conference, Arlington. VA.
116. Tucker, C., & Lepkowski, J. M. (2008). Telephone survey methods: Adapting to change. In J. M. Lepkowski, et al. (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
117. Turrell, G., Patterson, C., Olderburg, B., Gould, T., & Roy, M.-A. (2003). The socio-economic pattering of survey participation and non-response error in a multilevel study of food purchasing behavior: Area-and individual-level characteristics. Public Health Nutrition, 6, 181-189. (Pubitemid 36542435)
118. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009, October). 2010 Enhanced Planning Database. Unpublished memo. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Final Response Rates. Retrieved from www.Census.gov/dmd/www/response/2000response.html, n.d.
119. Van Goor, H., Jansma, F., & Veenstra, R. (2005). Differences in undercoverage and nonresponse between city neighborhoods in a telephone survey. Psychological Reports, 96, 867-878. (Pubitemid 41328666)
120. Van Ingen, E., Stoop, I., & Breedveld, K. (2009). Nonresponse in the Dutch time use survey: Strategies for response enhancement and bias reduction. Field Methods, 21, 69-90.
121. Voogt, R. J. J., & van Kempen, H. (2002). Nonresponse bias and stimulus effects in the Dutch National Election Study. Quality & Quantity, 36, 325-345. (Pubitemid 37132931)
122. Vehovar, V., & Zaletel, M. (1996). The matching project in Slovenia: Who are the nonrespondents? Tutkimuksia, 219, 193-203.
123. Wagner, J. R. (2008). Adaptive survey design to reduce nonresponse bias. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan.
124. West, B. T., & Kreuter, F. (2011). Observational strategies associated with increased accuracy of interviewer observations: Evidence from the National Survey of Family Growth. Unpublished Paper, University of Michigan.
125. West, B. T., & Olson, K. (2010). How much of interviewer variance is really nonresponse error variance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 1004-1025.
126. Yan, T., & Raghunathan, T. (2007, August). Using proxy measures of the survey variables in post-surveyadjustment in a transportation survey. Paper presented to the American Statistical Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
127. Zaletal, M., & Vehovar, V. (2000). Nonresponse and socio-demographic characteristics of enumeration areas. In A. Ferligoj & A. Mrvar (Eds.), Developments in survey methodology. Ljubljana: Metodoloski Zvezki.