Differences in undergoverage and nonresponse between city neighbourhoods in a telephone survey

Psychological Reports

Volumn 96, Issue 3 II, 2005, Pages 867-878

  Van Goor, Henk ^a   Jansma, Folbert ^a   Veenstra, René ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE; URBAN POPULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; TELEPHONE; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 24944451845     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.96.3c.867-878     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. ENGBERSEN, G. (1990) Publieke Bijstandsgeheimen: Het ontstaan van een onderklasse in Nederland. Leiden/Antwerpen: Stenfert Kroese.
2. ENGBERSEN, G., & VERVAART, J. (1993) Geheime nummers: De Nederlandse onderklasse houdt zieh gedekt. Intermediair, 29(35), 25-29.
3. FORD, E. S. (1998) Characteristics of survey participants with and without a telephone: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 55-60.
4. GELB, B. D. (1975) Incentives to increase survey returns: social class considerations. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 107-109.
5. GOYDER, J. (1987) The silent minority: nonrespondents on sample surveys. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
6. GOYDER, J., LOCK, J., & MCNAIR, T. (1992) Urbanization effects on survey nonresponse: a test within and across cities. Quality and Quantity, 26, 39-48.
7. GREEN, K. E. (1996) Sociodemographic factors and mail survey response. Psychology and Marketing, 13, 171-184.
8. GROVES, R. M., & COUPER, M. P. (1998) Nonresponse in household surveys. New York: Wiley.
9. HOUSE, J. S., & WOLF, S. (1978) Effects of urban residence on interpersonal trust and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1029-1043.
10. JOHNSON, T. P., O'ROURKE, D., & OWENS, L. (2002) Culture and survey nonresponse. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse. New York: Wiley. Pp. 55-69.
11. KEETER, S. (1995) Estimating telephone noncoverage bias with a telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 196-217.
12. LAVRAKAS, P. J. (1993) Telephone survey methods: sampling, selection, and supervision. (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: sage.
13. LEVINE, R. V., MARTINEZ, T. S., BRASE, G., & SORENSON, K. (1994) Helping in 36 U.S. cities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 69-82.
14. ROSS, C. E., MIROWSKY, J., & PRIBESH, S. (2001) Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust. American Sociological Review, 66, 568-591.
15. SAMPSON, R. J., & RAUDENBUSH, S. W. (1999/2000) Systemic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603-651.
16. SHAW, C. R., & MCKAY, H. D. (1942) Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: a study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago, IL: The Univer. of Chicago Press.
17. SNIJDERS, T., & BOSKER, R. (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK: The Cromwell Press.
18. STEBLAY, N. M. (1987) Helping behavior in rural and urban environments: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 346-356.
19. TAYLOR, R. B. (1996) Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: the systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociological Forum, 11, 41-74.
20. VAN GOOR, H., & RISPENS, S. (2004) A middle class image of society: a study of undercoverage and nonresponse bias in a telephone survey. Quality and Quantity, 38, 35-49.