Effektivität verhaltenspräventiver Interventionen zur Suchtvorbeugung

Suchttherapie

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 183-191

  Hanewinkel, Reiner ^a   Wiborg, Gudrun ^a  

^a IFT Nord   (Germany)

Author keywords

behavioral based prevention; Drug prevention; review

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052235054     PISSN: 14399903     EISSN: 1439989X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45524     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Caplan G. Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books, 1964
2. Institute of Medicine. Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994
3. Schwartz FJ, Walter U. Public Health: Prävention. In: Schwartz FW, Badura B, Leidl R et al (Hrsg). Das Public Health Buch. Gesundheit und Gesundheitswesen. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1998; 151–170
4. Hansen WB. School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum, 1980–1990. Health Educ Res 1992; 7: 403–430
5. Bruvold WH. A meta-analysis of adolescent smoking prevention programs. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 872–880
6. Rooney BL, Murray DM. A meta-analysis of smoking prevention programs after adjustment for errors in the unit of analysis. Health Educ Q 1996; 23: 48–64
7. Black DR, Tobler NC, Sciacca JP. Peer helping/involvement: an efficacious way to meet the challenge of reducing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth? J Sch Health 1998; 68: 87–93
8. Thomas R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 4: CD001293
9. White D, Pitts M. Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. Addiction 1998; 93: 1475–1487
10. Cuijpers P. Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Addict Behav 2002; 27: 1009–1023
11. Cuijpers P. Peer-led and adult-led school drug prevention: a metaanalytic comparison. Drug Educ 2002; 32: 107–119
12. Gottfredson DC, Wilson DB. Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prev Sci 2003; 4: 27–38
13. Cuijpers P. Three decades of drug prevention research. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy 2003; 10: 7–20
14. Hanewinkel R. Inhaltliche, konzeptionelle und organisatorische Bedingungen einer erfolgreichen schulischen Prävention des Rauchens. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 2003; 46: 677–682
15. Durlak JA. School-based prevention programs for children and adolescents. Developmental Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 34. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995
16. Durlak JA. Successful prevention programs for children and adolescents. Issues in Clinical Child Psychology. New York: Plenum, 1997
17. Europäische Beobachtungsstelle für Drogen und Drogensucht. Drogen im Blickpunkt. Drogenprävention an den Schulen in der EU. Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichung der Europäischen Gemeinschaften 2002
18. Tobler NC, Stratton HH. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the research. J Prim Prev 1997; 18: 73–128
19. Tobler NC, Roona MR, Ochshorn P et al. School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. J Prim Prev 2000; 20: 275–336
20. Walden K, Kröger C, Kutza R et al. ALF - Allgemeine Lebenskompetenzen und Fertigkeiten. Programm für Schüler und Schülerinnen der 5. Klasse mit Informationen zu Nikotin und Alkohol. Hohengehren: Schneider Verlag, 1998
21. Kröger C, Reese A. Schulische Suchtprävention nach dem Lebenskompetenzkonzept - Ergebnisse einer vierjährigen Interventionsstudie. Sucht 2000; 46: 209–217
22. Bölcskei PL, Hörmann A, Hollederer A et al. Suchtprävention an Schulen - Besondere Aspekte des Nikotinabusus: Effekte nach einer vierjährigen Intervention durch das Suchtpräventions- und Gesundheitsförderungsprogramm Klasse2000. Präv Rehab 1997; 9: 82–88
23. Gmel G, Rehm J, Knutsche E. Binge drinking in Europe: definitions, epidemiology, and consequences. Sucht 2003; 49: 105–116
24. Hanewinkel R, Wiborg G. Evaluation einer Kurzzeitintervention zur Förderung eines verantwortungsvollen Umgangs mit Alkohol bei Studenten. In: Richter G, Rommelspacher H, Spies C (Hrsg). Alkohol, Nikotin, Kokain … und kein Ende? Suchtforschung, Suchtmedizin und Suchttherapie am Beginn des neuen Jahrzehnts. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers, 2002; 344–350
25. Cohen J. Statistical power analyses for behavioral science. Hillsdale/New York: Erlbaum, 1988
26. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA 1995; 207: 1106–1112
27. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M et al. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 237–256
28. Tortu S, Botvin GJ. School-based smoking prevention: the teacher training process. Prev Med 1989; 18: 280–289
29. Kealey KA, Peterson AV Jr, Gaul MA et al. Teacher training as a behavior change process: principles and results from a longitudinal study. Health Educ Behav 2000; 27: 64–81
30. Nutbeam D, Macaskill P, Smith C et al. Evaluation of two school smoking education programmes under normal classroom conditions. BMJ 1993; 306: 102–107.
31. Comment in: BMJ 1993; 306: 516–517
32. BMJ 1993; 306:81
33. Künzel-Böhmer J, Bühringer G, Janik-Konecny T. Expertise zur Primärprävention des Substanzmiβbrauchs. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1993
34. Spoth RL, Lopez Reyes M, Redmond C et al. Assessing a public health approach to delay onset and progression of adolescent substance use: latent transition and log-linear analyses of longitudinal family preventive intervention outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67: 619–630
35. Spoth RL, Redmond C, Shin C. Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69: 627–642
36. Kumpfer KL, Molgaard V, Spoth R. The strengthening families program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. In: Peter RD, McMahon J (Hrsg). Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996; 241–267
37. Dusenbury L. Family drug abuse prevention programs: a review. J Prim Prev 2000; 20: 337–352
38. Perry CL, Williams CL, Forster JL et al. Background, conceptualization and design of a community-wide research program on adolescent alcohol use: Project Northland. Health Educ Res 1993; 8: 125–136
39. Komro KA, Perry CL, Veblen-Mortenson S et al. Peer participation in Project Northland: a community-wide alcohol use prevention project. J Sch Health 1994; 64: 318–322
40. Komro KA, Perry CL, Murray DM et al. Pre-planned social activities for preventing alcohol use among young adolescents. J Sch Health 1996; 66: 328–334
41. Perry CL, Williams CL, Veblen-Mortenson S et al. Project Northland: outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 956–965.
42. Comment in: Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 923–924
43. Williams CL, Perry CL, Farbakhsh K et al. Project Northland: comprehensive alcohol use prevention for young adolescents, their parents, schools, peers and communities. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 1999; 13: 112–124
44. Perry CL, Williams CL, Komro KA et al. Project Northland high school interventions: community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Educ Behav 2000; 27: 29–49
45. Komro KA, Perry CL, Williams CL et al. How did Project Northland reduce alcohol use among young adolescents? Analysis of mediating variables. Health Educ Res 2001; 16: 59–70
46. Perry CL, Williams CL, Komro KA et al. Project Northland: long-term outcomes of community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Educ Res 2002; 17: 117–132
47. Williams CL, Grechanaia T, Romanova O et al. Russian-American partners for prevention. Adaptation of a school-based parent-child programme for alcohol use prevention. Eur J Public Health 2001; 11: 314–321
48. Hollederer A, Bölcskei PL. Förderung von Lebenskompetenzen in der Schule - Effekt eines gemeindeorientierten Präventionsprogrammes auf den Zigarettenkonsum. Sucht 2002; 48: 357–369
49. Sowden A, Arblaster L, Stead L. Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 1: CD001291.
50. Update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD001291
51. Spruijt-Metz D, von Gageldonk A. What determines the effectiveness of mass media health campaigns targeting adolescent tobacco, alcohol and drug use? A review. Trimbos-instituut. Utrecht 2000
52. Sowden AJ, Arblaster L. Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD001006
53. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 1998; 279: 772–777;
54. comments JAMA 1998; 280: 323–324.
55. JAMA 1998; 280: 964–965
56. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Secker-Walker RH et al. Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 827–834
57. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Secker-Walker RH et al. Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention: effects 2 years after completion. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1148–1150
58. Farrelly MC, Niederdeppe J, Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control 2003; 12: i35-i47
59. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC et al. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 901–907
60. Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S. The Florida ‘truth’ antitobacco media evaluation: design, first-year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control 2001; 10: 9–15
61. Sly DF, Hopkins RS, Trapido E et al. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida “truth” campaign. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 233–238
62. Sly DF, Trapido E, Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med 2002; 35: 511–518
63. Hanewinkel R, Wiborg G. Primär- und Sekundärprävention des Rauchens im Jugendalter: Effekte der Kampagne “Be Smart - Don't Start”. Gesundheitswesen 2002; 64: 492–498
64. Wiborg G, Hanewinkel R. Effectiveness of the “Smoke-free Class Competition” in delaying the onset of smoking in adolescence. Prev Med 2002; 35: 241–249.
65. comment Evid Based Healthcare 2003; 7: 18–19
66. Hanewinkel R, Wiborg G. Dissemination der Nichtraucherkampagne “Be Smart - Don't Start” in den Jahren 1997 bis 2003 in Deutschland. Gesundheitswesen 2003; 65: 250–254
67. Farke W, Gaβmann R. Tabakkontrollpolitik in Deutschland: Gesundheitsschutz wäre machbar. In: Deutsche Hauptstelle für Suchtfragen (Hrsg). Jahrbuch Sucht 2003. Geesthacht: Neuland, 2003; 164–178
68. Jha P, Chaloupka F. Curbing the epidemic: governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999
69. Saffer H, Chaloupka F. The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 1117–1137