Normative change in science and the birth of the triple helix

Social Science Information

Volumn 50, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 549-568

  Etzkowitz, Henry ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

entrepreneurial science; normative change; triple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052219366     PISSN: 05390184     EISSN: 14617412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0539018411411403     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aitken;HSyntony and Spark: The Origins of Radio. New York: Wiley; 1976:.
2. Blumenthal;D, et al.University-industry research relations in biotechnology.Science. 1986;232:1361-1366.
3. Ben-David;JSilver Jubilee Symposium. Canberra: Australian Academy of Sciences; 1980:.
4. Bok;DBeyond the Ivory Tower: Social Responsibilities of the Modern University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982:.
5. Burns;T,Stalker;GMThe Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock; 1961:.
6. Scientific Research: Its Administration and Organization. Bush;GPBattery;LH, ed. Washington DC: American Universities Press; 1950:.
7. Candell;AB,Jaffee;ABIndustrializing Knowledge. Branscomb;LMKodama;FFlorida;R, ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1999:510-530.
8. Cotgrove;S,Box;SScience, Industry and Society. London: Allen & Unwin; 1970:.
9. Culliton;B.The academic industrial complex.Science. 1982;216 (4549): 960-962.
10. Djerassi;CThe Pill, Pygmy Chimps and Degas' Horse. New York: Basic Books; 1992:.
11. The Economist (1999) Lost in cyberspace. 353 (8150) 18December: 78.
12. Elzinga;A.The new production of reductionism in models relating to research policy. Nobel Symposium: Science and Industry in the 20th Century; 2002The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm; 2002.
13. Etzkowitz;H.Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science.Minerva. 1983;21 (2-3): 198-233.
14. Etzkowitz;HIndustrializing Knowledge. Branscomb;LKodama;FFlorida;R, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:203-233.
15. Etzkowitz;HMIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge; 2002:.
16. Etzkowitz;HThe Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. London: Routledge; 2008:.
17. Etzkowitz;HUniversity of Chicago; 2009:.
18. Etzkowitz;HThe Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Viale;REtzkowitz;H, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2010:201-217.
19. Etzkowitz;H,Blum;EScience and Technology in a Developing World. Shinn;TSpaapen;JKrishna;V, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1995:.
20. The University in the Global Knowledge Economy. Etzkowitz;HLeydesdorff;L, ed. London: Cassell; 1997:.
21. Etzkowitz;H,Viale;R.Polyvalent knowledge and the Entreperneurial University: a thrid academic revolution.Critical Sociology. 2010;36 (4): 595-609.
22. Etzkowitz;H,Webster;A,Gebhardt;C,Cantisano Terra;BRThe Future of the University and the University of the Future. Amsterdam: Elsevier N-H; 2000:.
23. Faulkner;W,Senker;JKnowledge Frontiers; Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics and Parallel Computing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995:.
24. Florida;R,Kenney;MThe Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America's Failure to Move From Innovation to Mass Production. New York: Basic Books; 1990:.
25. Geiger;RAmerican Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century. Altbach;PBerdahl;RGumport;P, ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999:38-70.
26. Genuth;J.Groping toward science policy in the United States in the 1930s.Minerva. 1987;25 (3): 238-268.
27. Gieryn;T.Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in the professional ideologies of scientists.American Sociological Review. 1983;48:781-795.
28. Glaser;BOrganizational Scientists. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill; 1964:.
29. Gold;LBoulder: University of Colorado; 1992:.
30. Goldhor;R,Lund;RT.University-to-industry advanced technology transfer: A case study.Research Policy. 1983;12 (3): 121-152.
31. Guston;DBetween Politics and Science: Assuring the Productivity and Integrity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.
32. Hagstrom;WThe Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books; 1965:.
33. The Management of Scientists. Hill;K, ed. Boston: Beacon Press; 1963:.
34. HoodL (1989) Interview with author.
35. Huizinga;JHomo Ludens. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1971:.
36. Jencks;C,Riesman;DThe Academic Revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; 1968:.
37. Johnston;RF,Edwards;CGEntrepreneurial Science. Westport, CT: Quorum; 1987:.
38. Kenney;MBiotechnology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1986:.
39. Kevles;DThe Physicists: History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. New York: Knopf; 1978:.
40. Kornberg;AThe Golden Helix: Inside Biotech Ventures. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books; 1995:.
41. Kornhauser;WScientists in Industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1982:.
42. Latour;B,Woolgar;SLaboratory Life. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1979:.
43. LederbergJ (1996) Interview with the author.
44. Machlup;FThe Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1962:.
45. Marcson;SThe Scientist in American Industry. New York: Harper; 1960:.
46. Marshall;G.Accounting for deviance.International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 1981;1 (1): 17-48.
47. Meier;R.Norms and the study of deviance: A proposed research strategy.Deviant Behavior. 1981;3:1-25.
48. Merton;RKSocial Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press; 1957:.
49. Merton;RKScience, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Harper and Row; 1970[1938]:.
50. Merton;RKThe Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1973[1942]:.
51. Minsky;MCambridge, MA:; 1987:.
52. Mitchell;C.Case and situation analysis.Sociological Review. 1983;31 (2): 187-211.
53. Mitroff;I.Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists.American Sociological Review. 1974;39:579-595.
54. Nelkin;DScience as Intellectual Property. New York: Macmillan; 1984:.
55. Noble;DAmerica by Design. New York: Knopf; 1977:.
56. NobleDPfundN (1980) The Plastic Tower: Business goes back to college. The Nation, 20September.
57. Orth;C.The optimum climate for industrial research.Harvard Business Review. 1959;47:55-64.
58. Pelz;D,Andrews;FScientists in Organizations. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Social Research; 1976:.
59. PollackR (1982) Interview with the author.
60. PollackR (1999) Personal communication from the author (December).
61. Reich;LThe Making of American Industrial Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985:.
62. Rosenberg;N,Nelson;R.American universities and technical advance in industry.Research Policy. 1994;23 (3): 323-348.
63. Sahlman;W.The new economy is stronger than you think.Harvard Business Review. 1999;77 (6): 99-106.
64. Sampat;B. 'The Research Corporation' presentation to the 'Interfaces Seminar'; 1999Columbia University; 1999.
65. Samuelson;P.Innovation and competition: Conflicts over intellectual property rights in new technologies.Science, Technology and Human Values. 1987;11 (1): 6-21.
66. Saxenian;ALRegional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994:.
67. Slaughter;S,Leslie;LAcademic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997:.
68. Storrs;RJThe Beginnings of Graduate Education in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1953:.
69. Tornqvist;GScience at the Cutting Edge: The Future of the Oresund Region. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press; 2002:.
70. Veysey;LThe Emergence of the American University. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1965:.
71. Vollmer;HA Preliminary Investigation and Analysis of the Role of Scientists in Research Organizations. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute; 1962:.
72. Zusman;AAmerican Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century. Altbach;PBerdahl;RGumport;P, ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999:109-150.