Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy on skill acquisition and performance

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 376-381

  Kho, Rosanne M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

laparoscopy; learning curve; robotics

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; OPERATION DURATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 80052203511     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31822b46f6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Methods of hysterectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.
2. Jacoby JL, Autry A, Jacobson G, et al. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114:1041-1048.
3. Kenngott HG, Muller-Stitch BP, Reiter MA, et al. Robotic suturing: Technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther. 2008;17: 160-167.
4. Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, et al. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:377-382.
5. Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery. 2010;147:830-839.
6. Falk V, Mintz D, Grunenfelder J, et al. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1282-1288. (Pubitemid 33035404)
7. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da- Vinci Robot system. Am J Surg. 2007;193:519-522. (Pubitemid 46412256)
8. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, et al. Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: Implications for training. Am J Surg. 2007;194:115-121. (Pubitemid 46876727)
9. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, et al. Learning curves of robotic and laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17: 171-174.
10. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the daVinci system. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:372-378. (Pubitemid 38524501)
11. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, et al. Robotic hysterectomy: Technique and initial outcomes. AJOG. 2007;197:113e1-114e.
12. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri- Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? JMIG. 2008;15:589-594.
13. Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, et al. Robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: Technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2009;10: 2390-2394.
14. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 114:162-167.
15. Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H. Learning curve and surgical outcome for roboticassisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: Case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. JMIG. 2010;17:739-748.
16. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri- Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? JMIG. 2008;15:589-594.
17. Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114 (2 Pt 1):236-243.
18. Schreuder HW, Zweemer RP, van Baal WM, et al. From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: Aspects of a single institution learning curve. Gynecol Surg. 2010;7: 253-258.
19. Kreiker GL, Bertoldi A, Larcher JS, et al. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;11: 229-235. (Pubitemid 38697859)
20. Altgassen C, Michels W, Schneider A. Learning laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:308-313. (Pubitemid 40458877)
21. Ghomi A, Littman P, Prasad A, et al. Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. JSLS. 2007;11:190-194.
22. Claerhout F, Roovers JP, Lewi P, et al. Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy- a single centre's experience. I Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2009;20:1119-1125.
23. Akladios CY, Dautun D, Saussine C, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: Establishment of a learning curve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149:218-221.
24. Chong GO, Park NY, Hong DG, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer; comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:1459-1464.
25. Garrett AJ, Nascimento MC, Nicklin JL, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: The Brisbane learning curve. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47:65-69. (Pubitemid 46152474)