The presence of matthew effects in dutch primary education, development of language skills over a six-year period

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 444-458

  Luyten, Hans ^a   Bruggencate, Gerdy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

longitudinal research; Matthew effect; reading skills

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TEST; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PARENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

CHILD; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE TESTS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NETHERLANDS; PARENTS;

EID: 80052200608     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219411410289     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aarnoutse C.,Van Leeuwe J.Development of poor and better readers during the elementary school.Educational Research and Evaluation.2000;6:252-278.
2. BastJ.(1995).The development of individual differences in reading ability (Unpublished PhD thesis).VU, Paedologisch Instituut, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
3. Bast J.,Reitsma P.Matthew effects in reading: A comparison of latent growth curve models and simplex models with structured means.Multivariate Behavioral Research.1997;32:135-157.
4. Bast J.,Reitsma P.Analyzing the development of individual differences in terms of Matthew effects in reading: Results from a Dutch longitudinal study.Developmental Psychology.1998;34:1373-1399.
5. Cain K.,Oakhill J.,Lemmon K.Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity.Journal of Educational Psychology.2004;96:671-681.
6. Clay M.M.Reading: The patterning of complex behaviour.Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann; 1979:.
7. Cooper H.,Nye B.,Charlton K.,Lindsay J.,Greathouse S.The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review.Review of Educational Research.1996;66:227-268.
8. Downey D.B.,Von Hippel P.T.,Broh B.A.Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year.American Sociological Review.2004;69:613-635.
9. Driessen G.,Claassen A.Voorbereidend lezen, rekenen en schrijven.Toetsresultaten en leerling-en leerkrachtkenmerken in de kleutergroepen van het basisonderwijs.Nijmegen, Netherlands: ITS; 1996:.
10. Guldemond H.,Bosker R.J.Ontwikkelingen in de groei van achterstanden? Op zoek naar de rol van de school.Groningen, Netherlands: GION; 2005:.
11. Heyns B.Summer learning and the effects of schooling.New York, NY: Academic Press; 1978:.
12. Juel C.Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology.1988;80:437-447.
13. Lundberg I.Learning to read (School research news letter).Stockholm, Sweden: National Board of Education; 1984:.
14. Luyten H.,Creemers-van Wees L.M.C.M.,Bosker R.J.The Matthew effect in Dutch primary education: Differences between schools, cohorts and pupils.Research Papers in Education.2003;18:167-195.
15. Merton R.K.The Matthew effect in science.Science.1968;159:56-63.
16. Mulder L.,Vierke H.,Petersen B.De vierde fase van de OVB-cohortonderzoeken.Het leerling-, school- en klasonderzoek in schooljaar 1994/1995.Nijmegen, Netherlands: ITS/GION; 1997:.
17. Mullis I.V.S.,Martin M.O.,Kennedy A.M.,Foy P.PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA's progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries.Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center; 2007:.
18. Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003.Paris, France: Author; 2004:.
19. Phillips L.M.,Norris S.P.,Osmond W.C.,Maynard A.M.Relative reading achievement: A longitudinal study of 187 children from first to sixth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology.2002;94:3-13.
20. Rasbash J.,Browne W.,Goldstein H.,Yang M.,Plewis I.,Healy M.,Lewis T.A user's guide to MLwiN.London, UK: University of London; 2000:.
21. Reezigt G.J.,Knuver A.Zittenblijven in het basisonderwijs.Pedagogische Studiën.1995;72:114-132.
22. Roeleveld J.,Van der Veen I.Kleuterbouwverlenging in Nederland: Omvang kenmerken en effecten.Pedagogische Studiën.2007;84:448-462.
23. Scarborough H.S.,Parker J.D.Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ and psychosocial problems from Grade 2 to Grade 8.Annals of Dyslexia.2003;53:47-71.
24. Shaywitz B.A.,Holford T.R.,Holahan J.M.,Fletcher J.M.,Stuebing K.K.,Francis D.J.,Shaywitz S.E.A Matthew effect for IQ but not for reading: Results from a longitudinal study.Reading Research Quarterly.1995;30:894-906.
25. Stanovich K.E.Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy.Reading Research Quarterly.1986;21:360-407.
26. Tesser P.,Mulder L.,Van der Werf G.De eerste fase van de longitudinale OVB-onderzoeken, het leerlingonderzoek.Nijmegen, Netherlands: ITS/RION; 1991:.
27. Toonder M.Geld spelt geen rol.Amsterdam, Netherlands:; 1983:.
28. Walberg H.J.,Tsai S.L.Matthew effects in education.American Educational Research Journal.1983;20:359-373.
29. Wechsler D.Wechsler intelligence scale for children - Revised.San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1989:.
30. Woodcock R.,Johnson M.BAllen Park, TX: DLM Teaching Resources; 1978:.