Beyond the Medical Model: Interdisciplinary Programs of Community-Engaged Health Research

Clinical and Translational Science

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 285-297

  Sadler, Lois S ^a   Newlin, Kelley H ^b   Johnson Spruill, Ida ^c   Jenkins, Carolyn ^c  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community health partnerships; Community health research; Community based participatory research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY CARE; COMMUNITY LIVING; COMMUNITY PROGRAM; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETIC PATIENT; FAMILY COPING; FAMILY DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SELF CARE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION;

CHILD; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFANT; INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 80052196445     PISSN: 17528054     EISSN: 17528062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00316.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. NIH. NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards. National Institutes of Health; 2009. Available at: Accessed September 26, 2010.
2. NIH. Overview of NIH Roadmap. National Institutes of Health; 2008. Available at: Accessed September 24, 2010.
3. Balas EA. From appropriate care to evidence-based medicine. Pediatr Ann. 1998; 27: 581-584.
4. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research- "Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007; 297(4): 403-406.
5. Chesla CA. Translational research: essential contributions from interpretive nursing science. Res Nurs Health. 2008; 31(4): 109-117.
6. Whittemore R, Grey M. The systematic development of nursing interventions. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002; 34(2): 115-120.
7. Woolf SH. The power of prevention and what it requires. JAMA. 2008; 299(2): 2437-2439.
8. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173-202.
9. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41(12): 1667-1676.
10. DuBois JM, Bailey-Burch B, Bustillos D, Campbell J, Cottler L, Fisher CB, Hadley WB, Hoop JG, Roberts L, Salter EK, et al. Ethical issues in mental health research: the case for community engagement. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011; 24: 208-214.
11. Macaulay AC, Commanda LE, Freeman WL, Gibson N, McCabe M, Robbins C, Twohig P. Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. Br Med J. 1999; 319: 774-778.
12. Horowitz CR, Robinson M, Seifer S. Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: are researchers prepared? Circulation. 2009; 119(19): 2633-2642.
13. Ross LF, Loup A, Nelson R, Botkin J, Kost R, Smith GR, Gehlert S. Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: a research ethics framework. J Emp Res Human Res Ethics. 2010; 5(1): 5-17.
14. Olsen D, vanderArend A, Drought T, Eby M, Fasting U, Gastmans C, Leino-Kilpi H, Lutzen K, Nojima S, Pang S, et al. Ethical considerations in international nursing research: a report from the International Centre for Nursing Ethics. Nurs Ethics. 2003; 10(2): 122-137.
15. Sadler LS, Updegrove S, Bouregy S, Breny-Bontempi J, DAgostino G, Dickey-Saucier L, LaPaglia D, Larson J, McCaslin C, Minor L, et al. Principles and Guidelines for Community-University Research Partnerships. New Haven, CT Yale Center for Clinical Investigation; 2009.
16. Stanton T. New times demand new scholarship: opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice. 2008; 3(19): 19-42.
17. NIH. RFA Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54). Accessed January 24, 2011.
18. Francis-Baldesari C, Williamson D. Integration of nursing education, practice and research through community partnerships. Adv Nurs Sci. 2008; 31(4): E1-E10.
19. Knafl K, Grey M. Clinical and translational science awards: opportunities and challenges for nurse scientists. Nurs Outlook. 2008; 56(3): 132-137.
20. Bilodeau R, Gilmore J, Jones L, Palmisano G, Banks T, Tinney B, Lucas G. Putting the "community" into community-based participatory research. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37: S192-S194.
21. Norris KC, Brusuelas R, Jones L, Miranda J, Duru OK, Mangione C. Partnering with community-based organizations: an academic institution's evolving perspective. Ethn Dis. 2007; 17: SI27-SI32.
22. Davey CJ.Lady with a Lamp. New York Lutterworth Press; 1958.
23. Nelson S, Rafferty A. Notes on Nightingale: The Influence and Legacy of a Nursing Icon. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press; 2010.
24. Cleary M, Hunt GE. Building community engagement in nursing. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010; 41(8): 344-345.
25. O'Neill M, Lemieux V, Groleau G, Fortin JP, Lamarche PA. Coalition theory as a framework for understanding and implementing intersectoral health-related intervention. Health Promot Int. 1997; 12(1): 79-86.
26. Delaney F. Muddling through the middle ground: theoretical concerns in intersectoral collaboration and health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1994; 9(3): 217-225.
27. CTSA. Researchers and their communities: the challenge of meaningful community engagement. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Community Engagement Key Function Committee. 2009. Available at: Accessed November 2, 2010.
28. Silka L, Cleghorn GD, Grullon M, Tellez T. Creating community-based participatory research in a diverse community: a case study. J Emp Res Human Res Ethics. 2008; 3(2): 5-16.
29. Berwick D. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003; 289(15): 1969-1975.
30. CDC. Principles of community engagement. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Committee on Community Engagement. 1997. Washington, DC US Government Printing Office; 1997.
31. Jones L, Wells K. Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA. 2007; 297(4): 407-410.
32. Warner KE. The need for and value of a multilevel approach to disease prevention. In: Smedley BD, Syme SL, eds. Promoting Health: Intervention Strategies from Social and Behavioral Research. Washington, DC National Academy Press; 2000: 40-53.
33. Schulz AJ, Northridge ME. Social determinants of health: implications for environmental health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(4): 455-471.
34. Schulz AJ, Williams D, Israel BA, Lempert LB. Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit. Milbank Quart. 2002; 80(4): 677-707.
35. Schulz AJ, Krieger J, Galea S. Addressing social determinants of health: community-based participatory approaches to research and practice. Health Educ Behav. 2002; 29(3): 287-295.
36. USDHHS. Healthy People 2010 Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Available at: Accessed November 16, 2010.
37. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 283-298.
38. Sadler LS, Slade A, Mayes L. Minding the baby: a mentalization-based parenting program. In: Allen JG, Fonagy P, eds. Handbook of Mentalization-Based Treatment. Chichester, UK Wiley; 2006: 271-288.
39. Slade A, Sadler LS, de Dios-Kenn C, Webb D, Ezepchick J, Mayes LC. Minding the baby: a reflective parenting program. Psychoanal Study Child. 2005; 60: 74-100.
40. Olds D, Sadler L, Kitzman H. Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: recent evidence from randomized trials. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007; 48: 355-391.
41. Mayes LC, Swain JE, Leckman J. Parental attachment systems: neural circuits, genes and experiential contributions to parental engagement. Clin Neurosci Res. 2005; 4: 301-313.
42. Slade A. Parental reflective functioning: an introduction. Attachment and Human Development. 2005; 7(3): 269-281.
43. Parker M, Barry C, King B. Use of inquiry method for assessment and evaluation in a school-based community nursing project. Fam Community Health. 2000; 23(2): 54-61.
44. Bolton LB, Georges CA. National black nurses association community collaboration model. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 1996; 8(2): 48-67.
45. Horowitz CR, Goldfinger JZ, Muller SE, Pulichino RS, Vance TL, Arniella G, Lancaster KJ. A model for using community-based participatory research to address the diabetes epidemic in East Harlem. Mt Sinai J Med. 2008; 75(1): 13-21.
46. Springer ET.Action Research. London Sage; 1999.
47. Newlin K, Melkus GD, Mclean Y, Dekker T, Wick A, Chyun D. Nicaraguan Creole and Miskito adults with or at-risk for type 2 diabetes: exploration of quality of life, A1c, and receipt of diabetes-related education/advice. Diabetes. 2010; 59(Suppl. 1): A282-A283.
48. Newlin K, Melkus GD, Mclean Y, Dekker T, Wick A, Chyun D. Mixed-methods results to inform church-based diabetes education in Nicaragua. Diabetes. 2010; 59(Suppl. 1): A282.
49. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89(9): 1322-1327.
50. Spruill I. Project Sugar: a recruitment model for successful African-American participation in health research. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 2004; 15(2): 48-53.
51. Johnson-Spruill I, Riegel B. The quality of diabetes care to Gullah families of South Carolina. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc. 2008; 19(2): 20-27.
52. Spruill I, Hammond P, Davis B, McGee Z, Louden D. Health of Gullah families in South Carolina with type 2 diabetes: diabetes self-management analysis from Project SuGAR. Diab Educator. 2009; 35(1): 117-123.
53. Sale M, Lu L, Spruill I, Fernandes J, Lok K, Divers J, Langerfeld C, Garvey T. Genome-wide linkage scan in Gullah-speaking African American families with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009; 58: 260-267.
54. Jenkins C, McNary S, Carlson BA, King MG, Hossler CL, Magwood GM, Zheng D, Hendrix K, Beck LS, Linnen F, et al. Reducing disparities for African Americans with diabetes: progress made by the REACH 2010 Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition. Public Health Rep. 2004; 119: 323-329.
55. Jenkins C, Pope CA, Magwood G, Vandemark L, Thomas V, Hill K, Linnen F, Beck LS, Zapka J. An evolving expanded chronic care framework to improve diabetes management - the REACH case study. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010; 4(1): 65-79.
56. Jenkins C, Magwood G, Thomas V, Linnen F. REACH Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition: improving outcomes for African Americans with diabetes. In: Liburd L, ed. Diabetes and Health Disparities Community-Based Approaches for Racial and Ethnic Populations. Philadelphia Springer; 2009: 237-256.
57. Jenkins C, Myers P, Heidari K, Kelechi T, Buckner-Brown J. Efforts to decrease diabetes-related amputations in African Americans by the racial and ethnic approaches to community health Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition. Fam Community Health. 2010; 34(15): S63-S78.