On the suitability of diversity metrics for learning-to-rank for diversity

SIGIR'11 - Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1185-1186

  Santos, Rodrygo L T ^a   Macdonald, Craig ^a   Ounis, Iadh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diversity; Learning to rank; Web search

Indexed keywords

DIVERSITY; DIVERSITY METRICS; EVALUATION METRICS; LEARNING APPROACH; LEARNING PROCESS; LEARNING TO RANK; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; WEB SEARCHES;

REDUNDANCY;

EID: 80052122326     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2009916.2010111     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. C. L. A. Clarke, N. Craswell, I. Soboroff, and A. Ashkan. A comparative analysis of cascade measures for novelty and diversity. In WSDM, 2011.
2. T.-Y. Liu. Learning to rank for information retrieval. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 3:225-331, 2009.
3. R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Exploiting query reformulations for Web search result diversification. In WWW, pages 881-890, 2010.
4. R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Intent-aware search result diversification. In SIGIR, 2011.
5. K. Spärck-Jones, S. E. Robertson, and M. Sanderson. Ambiguous requests: Implications for retrieval tests, systems and theories. SIGIR Forum, 41(2):8-17, 2007.
6. E. Yilmaz and S. E. Robertson. On the choice of effectiveness measures for learning to rank. Inf. Retr., 13(3):271-290, 2010.