The new Polish tests for speech intelligibility measurements

SPA 2009 - Signal Processing: Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements, and Applications - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 163-168

  Ozimek, Edward ^a   Kutzner, Dariusz ^a   Libiszewski, Pawel ^a   Warzybok, Anna ^a   Kocinski, Jedrzej ^a  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATRIX; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD; STANDARD DEVIATION;

ALGORITHMS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TESTING;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

EID: 80052100402     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Kalikow, D. N., K. N. Stevens and L. L. Elliot, Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1977. 61: p. 1337-1351. (Pubitemid 8086815)
2. Hagerman, B., Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand. Audiol., 1982. 11(79-87). (Pubitemid 12071211)
3. Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli and J. A. Sullivan, Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994. 95: p. 1085-1099. (Pubitemid 24056373)
4. Kollmeier, B. and M. Wesselkamp, Development and evaluation of a german sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 1997. 102(4): p. 2412-2421. (Pubitemid 27441394)
5. Brachmański and P. Staroniewicz, Fonetyczna struktura materiału testowego stosowanego w subiektywnych pomiarach jakości mowy, in Speech and language technology. 1999: Poznań. p. 71-80.
6. Versfeld, N. J., L. Daalder, J. M. Festen and T. Houtgast, Method for the selection of sentence material for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 2000. 107: p. 1671-1684. (Pubitemid 30141708)
7. Smits, C., T. Kapteyn and T. Houtgast, Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. International Journal of Audiology, 2004. 43: p. 15-28. (Pubitemid 38160245)
8. Wagener, K., T. Brand and B. Kollmeier, Development and evaluation of a german sentence test i-iii: Design, optimalization, and evaluation of the oldenburg sentence tests (in german). Z. Audiol., 1999. 38: p. 4-15, 44-56, 86-95.
9. Wagener, K., J. L. Josvassen and R. Ardenkjaer, Design, optimization, and evaluation of a danish sentence test in noise. Journal of International Audiology, 2003. 42: p. 10-17. (Pubitemid 37372682)
10. Wagener, K. C., F. Eeenboom, T. Brand and B. Kollmeier, Ziffern-tripel-test: Sprachverstandlichkeitstest über das telefon. Dga. 8. Jahrestangung. 2006, Göttingen: TagungsCD.
11. Wagener, K. C., T. Bräcker, T. Brand and B. Kollmeier, Evaluation des ziffern-tripel-tests über kopfhörer und telefon. Dga. 9. Jahrestangung. 2007, Köln: TagungsCD.
12. Runge, C. A. and H. Hosford-Dunn, Word recognition performance with modified cid w-22 word lists. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1985. 28: p. 355-362. (Pubitemid 15017368)
13. Pruszewicz, A., G. Demenko, L. Richter and T. Wika, New articulation lists for speech audiometry. Part i. Otolaryngol. Pol., 1994. 48: p. 50-55.
14. Pruszewicz, A., G. Demenko, L. Richter and T. Wika, New articulation lists for speech audiometry. Part ii. Otolaryngol. Pol., 1994. 48: p. 56-62.
15. Bosman, A. J. and G. F. Smoorenburg, Intelligibility of dutch cvc syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 1995. 34: p. 260-284. (Pubitemid 26039006)
16. Martin, M., Speech audiometry. 1997, Berlin: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
17. Plomp, R. and A. M. Mimpen, Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiol., 1979. 18: p. 43-53.
18. Smoorenburg, G. F., Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1992. 91(1): p. 421-437.
19. Smits, C., Hearing screening by telephone. 2005, Amsterdam: VU University Medical Center.
20. Lutman, M. E., Development of english digit triplet test for earphones and telephone. 2006, HearCom Meeting: Alphen.
21. Plomp, R. and A. M. Mimpen, Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1979. 66: p. 1333-1342.
22. Brand, T. and B. Kollmeier, Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 2002. 111: p. 2801-2810. (Pubitemid 34760267)
23. Ozimek, E., D. Kutzner, A. P. Sȩk, A. Wicher and O. Szczepaniak, The polish sentence test for speech intelligibility measurements. Archives of Acoustics, 2006. 31(4 Supplement).
24. Ozimek, E., D. Kutzner, A. Sȩk and A. Wicher, The polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. International Journal of Audiology, 2009. to be published.
25. Kollmeier, B., Messmetodik, modellierung und verbeserung der verstandlichkeir von sprache. 1990, Gottingen: Georg-August-Universtat.