Managing influence and conflict of interest with professionalism

American Surgeon

Volumn 77, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 807-813

  Meyer, Anthony A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CRIMINAL LAW; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN DIGNITY; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT CARE; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONALISM; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; PUNISHMENT; RESPONSIBILITY; SURGEON; SURGERY; TRUST;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS, MEDICAL;

EID: 80052063307     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Kassirer JP. On The Take: How America's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
2. Martin JB. The pervasive influence of conflicts of interest. Neurology 2010;74:2016-21.
3. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA 2000;283:373-80. (Pubitemid 30051756)
4. Birkhahn RH, Jauch E, Kramer DA, et al. SAEM Industry Relations Committee, 2008- 2009. A review of the federal guidelines that inform and influence relationships between physicians and industry. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:776-81.
5. Carreyrou J, McGinty T. Top spine surgeons reap royalties, Medicare bounty. Wall Street Journal (US Ed.). 2010 Dec 20: Business - Health Industry. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/ SB10001424052748703395204576024023361023138.html. Accessed February 2, 2011.
6. Montague PR. The perspective from neuroscience. In: Korn D, Ehringhaus S, eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Association of AmericanMedical Colleges; 2007:9-12. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
7. Ariely D. The psychological perspective. In: Korn D, Ehringhaus S, eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Association of AmericanMedical Colleges; 2007:13-8. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
8. Loewenstein G. The behavioral economics perspective. In: Korn D, Ehringhaus S, eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2007:19-24. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
9. Bazerman M. The public policy perspective. In: Korn D, Ehringhaus S, eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Association of AmericanMedical Colleges; 2007:25-8. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
10. Montague PR, King-Casas B, Cohen JD. Imaging valuation models in human choice. Annu Rev Neurosci 2006;29:417-48. (Pubitemid 44476852)
11. Ditto PH, Lopez DF. Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1992;63:568-84.
12. Moore D, Loewenstein G. Self- Interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Soc Justice Res 2004;17:189-202. (Pubitemid 39056672)
13. Alexander RD. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter A Division of Walter de Gruyter, Inc; 1987.
14. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998;351:637-41.
15. Deer B. Secrets of the MMR scare. How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed. BMJ 2011;342:c5347.
16. Deer B. Secrets of the MMR scare. How the vaccine crisis was meant to make money. BMJ 2011;342:c5258.
17. Deer B. Secrets of the MMR scare. The Lancet's two days to bury bad news. BMJ 2011;342:c7001.
18. Bion J. Financial and intellectual conflicts of interest: Confusion and clarity. Curr Opin Crit Care 2009;15:583-90.
19. Mazar N, Ariely D. Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. American Marketing Association 2006;25:117-26.
20. Lau HC, Passingham RE. Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 2007;27:5805-11. (Pubitemid 350021086)
21. Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF. All gifts large and small: toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift- Giving. Am J Bioeth 2010;10:11-7.
22. Chugh D, Bazerman MH, Banaji MR. Bounded ethically as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In: Moore DA, Cain DM, Loewenstein G, Baserman MH (ed.). Conflicts of Interest. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005:74-95.
23. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004;291:2457-65. (Pubitemid 38669189)
24. Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 2005;294:218-28. (Pubitemid 41043792)
25. Gelberman RH, Samson D, Mirza SK, et al. Orthopaedic surgeons and the medical device industry: The threat to scientific integrity and the public trust. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:765-77.
26. Luginbuhl RD, Kodner IJ, Keune JD. Conflicts of interest concerning the use of implants in the operating room. Surgery 2010;147:738-41.
27. Luty J, Arokiadass SM, Easow JM, Anapreddy JR. Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. J Med Ethics 2009;35:200-2.
28. Rothman DJ. Medical professionalism - Focusing on the real issues. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1284-6. (Pubitemid 30235961)
29. Ehringhaus SH, Weissman JS, Goold SD, et al. Responses of medical schools to institutional conflicts of interest. JAMA 2008;299:665-71. (Pubitemid 351252724)