Dimensionality and scale properties of the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The DiaDDzoB study

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  De Cock, Evi S A ^a   Emons, Wilco H M ^a   Nefs, Giesje ^a   Pop, Victor J M ^a   Pouwer, François ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANHEDONIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DIABETIC PATIENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; SEX DIFFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS;

DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREJUDICE; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 80052037533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-141     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ali S, Stone MA, Peters JL, Davies MJ, Khunti K. Prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2006, 23:1165-1173. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01943.x, 17054590.
2. Pouwer F, Beekman AT, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, Snoek FJ, Kostense PJ, Heine RJ, Deeg DJ. Rates and risks for co-morbid depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a community-based study. Diabetologia 2003, 46:892-898. 10.1007/s00125-003-1124-6, 12819896.
3. Pouwer F, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn PH, Tack CJ, Bazelmans E, Beekman AJ, Hein RJ, Snoek FJ. Prevalence of co-morbid depression is high in outpatients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Results from three outpatient clinics in The Netherlands. Diabet Med 2010, 27:217-24. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02903.x, 20546267.
4. Schram MT, Baan CA, Pouwer F. Depression and quality of life in patients with diabetes: a systematic review from the European Depression in Diabetes (EDID) Research Consortium. Current Diabetes Reviews 2009, 5:112-119. 10.2174/157339909788166828, 2764861, 19442096.
5. Lustman PJ, Clouse RE. Depression in diabetic patients: the relationship between mood and glycemic control. J Diabetes Complications 2005, 19:113-122.
6. Simon GE, Katon WJ, Lin EH, Rutter C, Manning WG, Von Korff M, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, Young BA. Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment among people with diabetes mellitus. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007, 64:65-72. 10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.65, 17199056.
7. Egede LE, Nietert PJ, Zheng D. Depression and all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality among adults with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28:133-1345.
8. De Groot M, Anderson R, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. Association of Depression and Diabetes Complications: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine 2001, 63:619-630.
9. Pouwer F, Skinner TC, Pibernik-Okanovic M, Beekman AT, Cradock S, Szabo S, Metelko Z, Snoek FJ. Serious diabetes-specific emotional problems and depression in a Croatian-Dutch-English Survey from the European Depression in Diabetes [EDID] Research Consortium. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005, 70:166-173. 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.03.031, 15913827.
10. Lustman PJ, Clouse RE. Treatment of depression in diabetes: impact on mood and medical outcome. J Psychosom Res 2002, 53:917-924. 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00416-6, 12377304.
11. Rubin RR, Ciechanowski P, Egede LE, Lin EH, Lustman PJ. Recognizing and treating depression in patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2004, 4:119-125. 10.1007/s11892-004-0067-8, 15035972.
12. Pouwer F, Beekman AT, Lubach C, Snoek FJ. Nurses' recognition and registration of depression, anxiety and diabetes-specific emotional problems in outpatients with diabetes mellitus. Patient Education and Counseling 2006, 60:235-240. 10.1016/j.pec.2005.01.009, 16442465.
13. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes: recommendations for standard, comprehensive, and minimal care. Diabetic Medicine 2006, 23:579-593. IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force.
14. American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2009. Diabetes Care 2009, 32(Suppl 1):S13-S61. 2613589, 19118286, American Diabetes Association.
15. International Diabetes Federation Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. 2005, International Diabetes Federation [online], International Diabetes Federation., http://www.idf.org/guidelines/type-2-diabetes
16. Pouwer F. Should we screen for emotional distress in type 2 diabetes mellitus?. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2009, 5(12):665-671. 10.1038/nrendo.2009.214, 19884900.
17. Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Van der Ploeg HM, Ader HJ, Heine RJ. Monitoring of psychological well-being in outpatients with diabetes: effect on mood, HbA1c, and the patient's evaluation of the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:1929-1935. 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1929, 11679459.
18. Bot M, Pouwer F, Ormel J, Slaets JP, de Jonge P. Predictors of incident major depression in diabetic outpatients with subthreshold depression. Diabet Med 2010, 27(11):1295-1301. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03119.x, 20950389.
19. Denollet J, Schiffer AA, Spek V. A general propensity to psychological distress affects cardiovascular outcomes: evidence from research on the type D (distressed) personality profile. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2010, 3(5):546-557. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.934406, 20841549.
20. Pouwer F, Kupper N, Adriaanse MC. Does emotional stress cause type 2 diabetes mellitus? A review from the European Depression in Diabetes (EDID) Research Consortium. Discov Med 2010, 9(45):112-8.
21. Lustman PJ, Clouse RE, Griffith LS, Carney RM, Freedland KE. Screening for depression in diabetes using the Beck Depression Inventory. Psychosom Med 1997, 59(1):24-31.
22. Zauszniewski JA, Chung C, Krafcik K, Sousa VD. Psychometric testing of the depressive cognition scale in women with type 2 diabetes. J Nurs Meas 2001, 9(1):61-72.
23. Lamers F, Jonkers CC, Bosma H, Penninx BW, Knottnerus JA, van Eijk JT. Summed score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was a reliable and valid method for depression screening in chronically ill elderly patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008, 61:679-687. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.018, 18538262.
24. Stahl D, Sum CF, Lum SS, Liow PH, Chan YH, Verma S, Chua HC, Chong SA. Screening for depressive symptoms: validation of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) in a multiethnic group of patients with diabetes in Singapore. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:1118-1119. 10.2337/dc07-2019, 18337303.
25. Van Steenbergen-Weijenburg KM, de Vroege L, Ploeger RR, Brals JW, Vloedbeld MG, Veneman TF, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Rutten FF, Beekman AT, van der Feltz Cornelis CM. Validation of the PHQ-9 as a screening instrument for depression in diabetes patients in specialized outpatient clinics. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:235. 10.1186/1472-6963-10-235, 2927590, 20704720.
26. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987, 150:782-786. 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782, 3651732.
27. Cox JL, Chapman G, Murray D, Jones P. Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women. J Affect Disord 1996, 39:185-189. 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00008-0, 8856422.
28. Lloyd-Williams M, Friedman T, Rudd N. Criterion validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a screening tool for depression in patients with advanced metastatic cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000, 20:259-265. 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00182-2, 11027907.
29. Koopmans B, Pouwer F, de Bie RA, Leusink GL, Denollet JK, Pop VJ. Associations between vascular co-morbidities and depression in insulin-naive diabetes patients: the DIAZOB Primary Care Diabetes study. Diabetologia 2009, 52:2056-2063. 10.1007/s00125-009-1460-2, 2744805, 19669635.
30. De Bruin GP, Swartz L, Tomlinson M, Cooper PJ, Molteno C. The factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale in a South African peri-urban settlement. South African J Psychology 2004, 34:113-121.
31. Berle J, Aarre TF, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Holsten F. Screening for postnatal depression: Validation of the Norwegian version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression. J Affect Disord 2003, 76:151-156. 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00082-4, 12943945.
32. Pop VJ, Komproe IH, van Son MJ. Characteristics of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale in the Netherlands. J Affect Disord 1992, 26:105-110. 10.1016/0165-0327(92)90041-4, 1447427.
33. Brouwers EPM, van Baar AL, Pop VJM. Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety?. J Psychosom Res 2001, 51:659-663. 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00245-8, 11728506.
34. Jomeen J, Martin CR. Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2005, 23:143-154.
35. Tuohy A, McVey C. Subscales measuring symptoms of non-specific depression, anhedonia, and anxiety in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Clin Psychol 2008, 47:153-169. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2008.tb00463.x, 17761026.
36. Cole SR, Kawachi I, Mailer SJ, Berkman LF. Test of item response bias in the CES-D scale: Experience from the New Haven EPESE study. J of Clinic Epidem 2000, 53:285-289.
37. Teussèdre F, Chabrol H. Detecting women at risk for postnatal depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 2 to 3 Days Postpartum. Can J Psychiatry 2004, 49:51-54.
38. Cox JL, Murray D, Chapman G. A controlled study of the onset, duration and prevalence of postnatal depression. Br J Psychiatry 1993, 163:27-63. 10.1192/bjp.163.1.27, 8353695.
39. Matthey S, Henshaw C, Elliot S, Barnett B. Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Implications for clinical and research practice. Arch Womens Ment Health 2006, 9:309-315. 10.1007/s00737-006-0152-x, 17013761.
40. Emons WHM, Meijer RR, Denollet J. Negative affectivity and social inhibition in cardiovascular disease: Evaluating Type-D personality and its assessment using item response theory. J Psychosom Res 2007, 63:27-39. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.03.010, 17586335.
41. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. 2003, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. 2000, Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Reise SP, Waller NG. Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annu Rev of Clin Psychol 2009, 5:27-48.
44. Meijer RR, Baneke JJ. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Psychol Methods 2004, 9:345-368.
45. Sijtsma K, Emons WHM, Bouwmeester S, Nyklíček I, Roorda LD. Nonparametric IRT analysis of quality-of-life scales and its application to the world health organization quality of life scale (WHOQOL-bref). Qual Life Res 2008, 17:275-299. 10.1007/s11136-007-9281-6, 2238782, 18246447.
46. Nefs G, Pouwer F, Denollet J, Pop V. Psychological risk factors of micro- and macrovascular outcomes in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: Rationale and design of the DiaDDZoB Study. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:388. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-388, 2914779, 20594337.
47. Spek V, Nyklíček I, Cuipers P, Pop V. Internet administration of the Edinburgh Depression Scale. J Affect Disord 2008, 106:301-305. 10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.003, 17689667.
48. Pallant JF, Miller RL, Tennant A. Evaluation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale using Rasch Analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2006, 6:28-38. 10.1186/1471-244X-6-28, 1513211, 16768803.
49. Logsdon MC, Usui WM, Nering M. Validation of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale for adolescent mothers. Arch Womens Ment Healt 2009, 12:433-440.
50. Van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory 1997, New York: Springer.
51. Hambleton RK, Van der Linden WJ, Wells CS. IRT models for the analysis of polytomously scored data: Brief and selected history of model building advances. Handbook of polytomous item response theory models 2010, 21-42. New York: Routlegde, Nering ML, Ostini R.
52. Sijtsma K, Molenaar IW. Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 2002,
53. Samejima F. Graded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory 1997, 85-100. New York: Springer, Van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK.
54. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical theories of mental test scores. 1968, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
55. Fischer GH. Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. 1995, New York: Springer, Molenaar IW.
56. Van der Ark LA. Stochastic ordering of the latent trait by the sum score under various polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika 2005, 70:283-304.
57. Wismeijer AAJ, Sijtsma K, van Assen MALM, Vingerhoets AJJM. A Comparative Study of the Dimensionality of the Self-Concealment Scale Using Principal Components Analysis and Mokken Scale Analysis. J Pers Assess 2008, 90:323-334. 10.1080/00223890802107875, 18584441.
58. Emons WHM, Sijtsma K, Pedersen SP. Dimensionality of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Cardiac patients: Comparison of Mokken Scale Analysis and Factor Analysis. Assessment , http://asm.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/10/14/1073191110384951.long
59. Molenaar IW, Sijtsma K. User's manual MSP5 for Windows. 2000, Groningen: proGAMMA.
60. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's guide. 1998, Los Angels CA: Muthen & Muthen.
61. Thissen D, Steinberg L, Wainer H. Detection of differential item functioning using the parameters of item response models. Differential item functioning 1993, 67-113. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Holland PW, Wainer H.
62. Thissen D, . IRTLRDIF2.0 Software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning [Software]. 2001, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, IRTLRDIF2.0.
63. Orlando-Edelen M, Thissen D, Teresi JA, Kleinman M, Ocepek-Welikson K. Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood based model comparison approach: Applications to the Mini-Mental State Examination. Med Care 2006, 44(Suppl 3):134-142.
64. Emons WHM, Meijer RR, Denollet J. Negative affectivity and social inhibition in cardiovascular disease: Evaluating Type-D personality and its assessment using item response theory. J Psychosom Res 2007, 63:27-39. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.03.010, 17586335.
65. Gibbons RD, Bock D, Hedeker D, Weiss DJ, Segawa E, Bhaumik DK, Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Grochocinski VJ, Stover A. Full-information factor analysis of graded response data. Appl Psych Meas 2007, 31:4-19.
66. Reise SP, Morizot J, Hays RD. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2007, 16:19-31. 10.1007/s11136-007-9183-7, 17479357.
67. Gibbons RD, Hedeker D. BIFACTOR: A computer program for full-information item bifactor models for analysis of binary and ordinal response data. 2007, Chicago: Center of health statistics, University of Illinois., http://www.healthstats.org/bifactor.html
68. Steinberg L, Thissen D. Uses of item response theory and testlet concept in measurement of psychopathology. Psychol Meth 1996, 1:81-97.
69. Thissen D, Chen W-H, Bock D. MULTILOG 7 [software]. 2003, Licolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
70. Drasgow F, Levine MV, Tsien S, Williams B, Mead A. Fitting polychotomous item response theory models to multiple choice tests. Appl Psych Meas 995 19:143-165.
71. Stone CA. Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models. J Educ Meas 2000, 37:58-75.
72. Schreisheim CA, Eisenbach RJ, Hill KD. The effect of negation and polar item reversals on questionnaire reliability and validity: An experimental investigation. Educ and Psychol Meas 1991, 51:67-78.
73. Woods CM. Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications for confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychopathol Behav 2006, 28:189-194.
74. Sijtsma K, Emons WHM. Advice on total-score reliability issues in psychosomatic measurement. J Psychosom Res 2011, 70:565-572. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.11.002, 21624580.
75. Bergink V, Kooistra L, Lambregtse-van den Berg MP, Wijnen H, Bunevicius R, van Baar A, Pop V. Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy. J Psychosom Res 2011, 70:385-398. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008, 21414460.
76. Becht MC, Van Erp CF, Teeuwisse TM, Van Heck GL, Van Son MJ, Pop VJ. Measuring depression in women around menopausal age: Towards a validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale. J Affect Disord 2001, 63:209-213. 10.1016/S0165-0327(99)00189-5, 11246097.
77. Nyclíçek I, Scherders MJ, Pop VJ. Multiple assessments of depressive symptoms as an index of depression in population-based samples. Psych Res 2004, 128:111-116.
78. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haugh TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002, 52:69-77. 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3, 11832252.
79. Cyr JJ, McKenna-Foley JM, Peacock E. Factor structure of the SCL-90-R: Is there one?. J Pers Assess 1985, 49:571-578. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_2, 4093836.
80. Vassend O, Skrondal A. The problem of structural indeterminacy in multidimensional symptom report instruments. The case of SCL-90-R. Behav Res Ther 1999, 37:685-701. 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00182-X, 10402693.