Computed tomographic angiography of carotid artery stenosis

Carotid Disease: The Role of Imaging in Diagnosis and Management

Volumn 9780521862264, Issue , 2006, Pages 158-165

  Nederkoorn, Paul J ^a   Majoie, Charles B L M ^a   Stam, Jan ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEMODYNAMICS; SURGERY;

ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS; CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS; CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMIES; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR STENTING; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACKS;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 80052010604     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511544941.013     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Alvarez-Linera, J., ito-Leon, J., Escribano, J., Campollo, J. and Gesto, R. (2003). Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR. American Journal of Neurorodiology, 24, 1012-19.
2. Anderson, G. B., Ashforth, R., Steinke, D. E., Ferdinandy, R. and Findlay, J. M. (2000). CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke, 31, 2168-74.
3. Barnett, H. J. (2004). Carotid endarterectomy. Lancet, 363, 1486-7.
4. Berg, M., Zhang, Z., Ikonen, A., et al. (2005). Multidetector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 26, 1022-34.
5. Binaghi, S., Maeder, P., Uske, A., et al. (2001). Threedimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis. European Neurology, 46, 25-34.
6. Buskens, E., Nederkoorn, P. J., Buijs-Van Der, W. T., et al. (2004). Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology, 233, 101-12.
7. Cambria, R. P. (2004). Stenting for carotid-artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 1565-7.
8. de Monye, C., Cademartiri, F., de Weert, T. T., et al. (2005). Sixteen-detector row CT angiography of carotid arteries: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a bolus chaser. Radiology, 237, 555-62.
9. Dillon, E. H., van Leeuwen, M. S., Fernandez, M. A., Eikelboom, B. C. and Mali, W. P. (1993). CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology, 189, 211-19.
10. Dix, J. E., Evans, A. J., Kallmes, D. F., Sobel, A. H. and Phillips, C. D. (1997). Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 18, 409-15.
11. Feasby, T. E. and Findlay, J. M. (2004). CT angiography for the assessment of carotid stenosis. Neurology, 63, 412-13.
12. Fleischmann, D. (2002). Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. European Radiology, 12 (Suppl. 2), S11-S15.
13. Gillard, J. H. (2003). Imaging of carotid artery disease: from luminology to function? Neuroradiology, 45, 671-80.
14. Halliday, A., Mansfield, A., Marro, J., et al. (2004). Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 363, 1491-502.
15. Hankey, G. J., Warlow, C. P. and Molyneux, A. J. (1990). Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 53, 542-8.
16. Hirai, T., Korogi, Y., Ono, K., et al. (2001). Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA. Radiology, 221, 802-9.
17. Hollingworth, W., Nathens, A. B., Kanne, J. P., et al. (2003). The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: a systematic review. European Journal of Radiology, 48, 88-102.
18. Josephson, S. A., Bryant, S. O., Mak, H. K., et al. (2004). Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology, 63, 457-60.
19. Kaufmann, T. J. and Kallmes, D. F. (2005). Utility of MRA and CTA in the evaluation of carotid occlusive disease. Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 18, 75-82.
20. King-Im, J M., Hollingworth, W., Trivedi, R. A., et al. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy. Annals of Neurology, 58, 506-15.
21. Koelemay, M. J., Nederkoorn, P. J., Reitsma, J. B. and Majoie, C. B. (2004). Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke, 35, 2306-12.
22. McKinney, A. M., Casey, S. O., Teksam, M., et al. (2005). Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography. Neuroradiology, 47, 1-9.
23. Nederkoorn, P. J., Elgersma, O. E., Mali, W. P., et al. (2002). Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36, 806-13.
24. Nederkoorn, P. J., vander, Graaf, Y. and Hunink, M. G. (2003). Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. Stroke, 34, 1324-32.
25. Nonent, M., Serfaty, J. M., Nighoghossian, N., et al. (2004). Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of the CARMEDAS multicenter study. Stroke, 35, 682-6.
26. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. (1991). Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with highgrade carotid stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 445-53.
27. Pan, X. M., Saloner, D., Reilly, L. M., et al. (1995). Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 21, 82-8.
28. Papp, Z., Patel, M., Ashtari, M., et al. (1997). Carotid artery stenosis: optimization of CT angiography with a combination of shaded surface display and source images. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 18, 759-63.
29. Patel, S. G., Collie, D. A., Wardlaw, J. M., et al. (2002). Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73, 21-8.
30. Randoux, B., Marro, B., Koskas, F., et al. (2001). Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, threedimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology, 220, 179-85.
31. Rothwell, P. M. (2000). Analysis of agreement between measurements of continuous variables: general principles and lessons from studies of imaging of carotid stenosis. Journal of Neurology, 247, 825-34.
32. Rothwell, P. M., Eliasziw, M., Gutnikov, S. A., et al. (2003). Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 361, 107-16.
33. Serfaty, J. M., Chirossel, P., Chevallier, J. M., et al. (2000). Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 175, 455-63.
34. Takhtani, D. (2005). CT neuroangiography: a glance at the common pitfalls and their prevention. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 185, 772-83.
35. Van Straten. M., Venema, H. W., Streekstra, G. J., et al. (2004). Removal of bone in CT angiography of the cervical arteries by piecewise matched mask bone elimination. Medical Physics, 31, 2924-33.
36. Venema, H. W., Hulsmans, F. J. and den Heeten, G. J. (2001). CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone eliminationfeasibility study. Radiology, 218, 893-8.
37. Vieco, P. T. (1998). CT angiography of the carotid artery. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, 8, 593-605.
38. Westwood, M. E., Kelly, S., Berry, E., et al. (2002). Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 324, 198.
39. Willinsky, R. A., Taylor, S. M., TerBrugge, K., et al. (2003). Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology, 227, 522-8.
40. Wise, S. W., Hopper, K. D., Ten, H. T. and Schwartz, T. (1998). Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: the dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 170, 919-23.
41. Zhang, Z., Berg, M. H., Ikonen, A. E., Vanninen, R. L. and Manninen, H. I. (2004). Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method. European Radiology, 14, 665-72.
42. Zhang, Z., Berg, M., Ikonen, A., et al. (2005). Carotid stenosis degree in CT angiography: assessment based on luminal area versus luminal diameter measurements. European Radiology, 15, 2359-65.