The role of inbreeding and outbreeding in herbivore resistance and tolerance in Vincetoxicum hirundinaria

Annals of Botany

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 547-555

  Muola, Anne ^a   Mutikainen, Pia ^b   Laukkanen, Liisa ^a   Lilley, Marianna ^a   Leimu, Roosa ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abrostola asclepiadis; Inbreeding depression; mating system; outbreeding depression; resistance; tolerance; Vincetoxicum hirundinaria

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AUTOGAMY; HERB; HERBIVORE; HOST PLANT; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; TOLERANCE; VULNERABILITY;

ANIMAL; APOCYNACEAE; ARTICLE; GENETICS; HERBIVORY; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INBREEDING; INNATE IMMUNITY; MOTH; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ASCLEPIADACEAE; HERBIVORY; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; INBREEDING; MOTHS;

ABROSTOLA ASCLEPIADIS; VINCETOXICUM HIRUNDINARIA;

EID: 80051988059     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr174     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agrawal AA. 2005. Natural selection on common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) by a community of specialized insect herbivore. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7: 651-667.
2. Armbruster P, Reed DH. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Bello-Bedoy R, Núñez-Farfán J. 2010. Cost of inbreeding in resistance to herbivores in Datura stramonium. Annals of Botany 105: 747-753.
4. Bello-Bedoy R, Núñez-Farfán J. 2011. The effect of inbreeding on defence against multiple enemies in Datura stramonium. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 518-530.
5. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Nitao JK. 1986. Constraints on chemical coevolution: Wild parsnip and the parsnip webworm. Evolution 40: 1215-1229.
6. Bookman SS. 1984. Evidence for selective fruit production in Asclepias. Evolution 38: 72-86.
7. Campbell DR,Waser NM. 1987. The evolution of plant mating systems: Multilocus simulations of pollen dispersal. American Naturalist 129: 593-609.
8. Carr DE, Eubanks MD. 2002. Inbreeding alters resistance to insect herbivory and host plant quality in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 56: 22-30.
9. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-269.
10. Delphia CM, Moraes CM, Stephenson AG, Mescher MC. 2009. Inbreeding in horsenettle influences herbivore resistance. Ecological Entomology 34: 513-519.
11. Du D, Winsor JA, Smith M, DeNicco A, Stephenson AG. 2008. Resistance and tolerance to herbivory changes with inbreeding and ontogeny in a wild gourd (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 84-92.
12. Dudash MR. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a selfcompatible, protandrous species, Silene angularis (Gentianaceae): A comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139.
13. Eibler EU, Tanner KK, Mayer W, Wiegreb E, Reger H. 1995. HPLC-analysis of alkaloids from Cynanchum vincetoxicum. Acta Pharmaceutica (Zagreb) 45: 487-493.
14. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
15. Falconer DS. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. London: longman.
16. Fritz RS, Moulia C, Newcombe G. 1999. Resistance of hybrid plants and animals to herbivores, pathogens, and parasites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 565-591.
17. Förare J. 1995. The biology of the noctuid moth Abrostola asclepiadis Schiff. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Sweden. Entomologisk Tidskrift 116: 179-186.
18. Förare J, Engqvist L. 1996. Suboptimal patch and plant choice by an ovipositing monophagous moth - an insurance against bad weather̂ Oikos 77: 301-309.
19. Hanley ME, May OC. 2006. Cotyledon damage at the seedling stage affects growth and flowering potential in mature plants. New Phytologist 169: 243-250.
20. Hanley ME, Sykes RJ. 2009. Impact of seedling herbivory on plant competition and implications for species coexistence. Annals of Botany 103: 1347-1353.
21. Heschel MS, Paige KN. 1995. Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregate). Conservation Biology 9: 126-133.
22. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
23. Ivey CT, Carr DE, Eubanks MD. 2004. Effects of inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus on tolerance to herbivory in natural environments. Ecology 85: 567-574.
24. Ivey CT, Carr DE, Eubanks MD. 2009. Genetic variation and constraints on the evolution of defense against spittlebug (Philaenus spumarius) herbivory in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 102: 303-311.
25. Jarne P, Charlesworth D. 1993. The evolution of the selfing rate in fuctionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 441-466.
26. Johnson MTJ, Smith SD, Rausher MD. 2009. Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 18079-18084.
27. Kahn AP, Morse DH. 1991. Pollinium germination and putative ovule penetration in self- and cross-pollinated common milkweed Asclepias syriaca. American Midland Naturalist 126: 61-67.
28. Karban R, Baldwin IT. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Kause A, Haukioja E, Hanhimäki S. 1999. Phenotypic plasticity in foraging behavior of sawfly larvae. Ecology 80: 1230-1241.
30. Keller LF, Waller DM. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 230-241.
31. Kephart SR. 1981. Breeding systems in Asclepias incarnata L., A. syriaca L. and A. verticillata L. American Journal of Botany 68: 226-232.
32. LehtiläK. 2003. Precision of herbivore tolerance experiments with imposed and natural damage. Evolution 57: 677-680.
33. Leimu R. 2004. Variation in the mating system of Vincetoxicum hirundinaria (Asclepiadaceae) in peripherial island populations. Annals of Botany 93: 107-113.
34. Leimu R, Fischer M. 2010. Between-population outbreeding affects plant defence. PLoS ONE 5: E12614. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012614.
35. Leimu R, LehtiläK. 2006. Effects of two types of herbivores on the population dynamics of a perennial herb. Basic and Applied Ecology 7: 224-235.
36. Leimu R, Mutikainen P. 2005. Population history, mating system and fitness variation in a perennial herb with a fragmented distribution. Conservation Biology 19: 1-9.
37. Leimu R, Riipi M, Staerk D. 2005. Food preference and performance of the larvae of a specialist herbivore: Variation among and within host-plant populations. Acta Oecologia 28: 325-330.
38. Leimu R, Kloss L, Fischer M. 2008. Effects of experimental inbreeding on herbivore resistance and plant fitness: The role of history of inbreeding, herbivory and abiotic factors. Ecology Letters 11: 1101-1110.
39. Lipow SR, Wyatt R. 2000. Towards an understanding of the mixed breeding system of swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata). Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 127: 193-199.
40. Lipow SR, Broyles SB, Wyatt R. 1999. Population differences in self fertility in the self incompatible milkweed Asclepias exaltata (Asclepiadaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1114-1120.
41. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. 2006. SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
42. Lynch M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
43. Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associations Inc. Marquis RJ. 1984. Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science 226: 537-539.
44. Marquis RJ. 1990. Genotypic variation in leaf damage in Piper arieianum (Piperaceae) by a multispecies assemblage of herbivores. Evolution 44: 104-120.
45. Moran N, Hamilton WD. 1980. Low nutritive quality as defense against herbivores. Journal of Theoretical Biology 86: 247-254.
46. Muola A, Mutikainen P, Lilley M, Laukkanen L, Leimu R. 2010a. Genetic variation in herbivore resistance and tolerance: The role of plant life-history stage and type of damage. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 2185-2196.
47. Muola A, Mutikainen P, Lilley M, Laukkanen L, Salminen JP, Leimu R. 2010b. Associations of plant fitness, leaf chemistry, and damage suggest selection mosaic in plant-herbivore interactions. Ecology 91: 2650-2659.
48. Núñez-Farfán J, Cabrales-Vargas RA, Dirzo R. 1996. Mating system consequences on resistance to herbivory and life history traits in Datura stramonium. American Journal of Botany 83: 1041-1049.
49. Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL. 2007. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 541-566.
50. Ouborg NJ, Biere A, Mudde CL. 2000. Inbreeding effects on resistance and transmission-related traits in the Silene-Microbotryum pathosystem. Ecology 81: 520-531.
51. Simms EL, Rausher MD. 1987. Costs and benefits of plant defence to herbivory. American Naturalist 130: 570-581.
52. Slansky F. 1993. Nutritional ecology: The fundamental quest for nutrients. In: Stamp NE, Casey TM. eds. Catepillars: Ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging. New York: Chapman and Hall, 29-91.
53. Slatkin M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 393-430.
54. Solbreck C, Sillén-Tullberg B. 1990. Population dynamics of a seed feeding bug, Lygaeus equestris. 1. Habitat patch structure and spatial dynamics. Oikos 58: 199-209.
55. Staerk D, Christensen J, Lemmich E, Duus JÖ, Olsen CE, Jaroszewski JW. 2000. Cytotoxic activity of some phenanthroindolizidine N-oxide alkaloids from Cynanchum vincetoxicum. Journal of Natural Products 63: 1584-1586.
56. Steets JA, Knight TM, Ashman TL. 2007a. The interactive effects of herbivory and mixed mating for the population dynamics of Impatiens capensis. American Naturalist 170: 113-127.
57. Steets JA, Wolf DE, Auld JR, Ashman TL. 2007b. The role of natural enemies in the expression and evolution of mixed mating in hermaphroditic plants and animals. Evolution 61: 2043-2055.
58. Stephenson AG, Leyshon B, Travers SE, Hayes N, Winsor JA. 2004. Interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease on reproduction in a wild gourd. Ecology 85: 3023-3034.
59. Strauss S, Agrawal A. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 179-185.
60. Strauss S, Karban R. 1994. The significance of outcrossing in an intimate plant-herbivore relationship. I. Does outcrossing provide an escape from herbivores adapted to the parent plant? Evolution 48: 454-464.
61. Tiffin P. 2000. Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivoreš American Naturalist 155: 128-139.
62. Timonin AK, Savitskii M. 1997. Pollination efficiency of Vincetoxicum hirundinaria (Asclepiadaceae s. str.). Botanicheskii Zhurnal St. Petersburg. 82: 45-52.
63. Vogler DW, Kalisz S. 2001. Sex among the flowers: The distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55: 202-204.
64. Von Numers M, van der Maarel E. 1998. Plant distribution patterns and ecological gradients in the Southwest Finnish archipelago. Global Ecology and Biogeography 7: 421-440.
65. Waser NM, Price MV. 1983. Optimal and actual outcrossing in plants, and the nature of plant-pollinator interaction. In: Jones CE, Little RJ. eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 341-359.
66. Waser NM. 1993. Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. In: Thornhill NW. ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 173-199.
67. Wyatt R. 1976. Pollination and fruit-set in Asclepias: A reappraisal. American Journal of Botany 63: 845-851.
68. Wyatt R, Broyles SB. 1994. Ecology and evolution of reproduction in milkweeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 423-441.