The limits of legitimacy: Service providers' views on maintenance treatment in Sweden

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 427-437

  Ekendahl, Mats ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

discourse; Maintenance treatment; methadone; opiate addiction; service providers; substitution

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051986680     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: 14767392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/16066359.2010.545158     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Albertín, P., & Íñiguez, L. (2008). Using drugs: The meaning of opiate substances and their consumption from the consumer perspective. Addiction Research and Theory, 16, 434-452.
2. Amato, L., Davoli, M., Perucci, C.A., Ferri, M., Faggiano, F., & Mattick, R.P. (2005). An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: Available evidence to inform clinical practice and research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28, 321-329.
3. Amato, L., Minozzi, S., Davoli, M., Vecchi, S., Ferri, M., & Mayet, S. (2008). Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), Art. No. CD004147. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004147.pub3.
4. Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
5. Bergschmidt, V. (2004). Pleasure, power and dangerous substances: Applying Foucault to the study of 'heroin dependence' in Germany. Anthropology and Medicine, 11, 59-73.
6. Blomqvist, J., Palm, J., & Storbjörk, J. (2009). 'More cure and less control' or 'more care and lower costs'? Recent changes in services for problem drug users in Stockholm and Sweden. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 16, 479-496.
7. Bourgois, P. (2000). Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 24, 165-195.
8. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
9. CAN (2009). Drogutvecklingen i Sverige 2009. CAN Rapport 117. Stockholm: Centralförbundet fö r alkohol- och narkotikaupplysning.
10. Dehue, T. (2000). Historiography taking issue: Analyzing an experiment with heroin abusers. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40, 247-264.
11. Ekendahl, M. (2009a). Limits of evidence - The case of psychosocial interventions in a Swedish review of maintenance treatment research. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 26, 399-414.
12. Ekendahl, M. (2009b). The construction of maintenance treatment legitimacy: A discourse analysis of a policy shift. Evidence and Policy, 5, 247-265.
13. EMCDDA (2009). Annual report 2009: The state of the drugs problem in Europe. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from . eu/attachements.cfm/att-93236-EN-EMCDDA-AR2009-EN.pdf
14. EMCDDA (2010 Country overview: Sweden. Key statistics on the drug situation in Sweden. Retrieved from http:// www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/ country-overviews/se/data-sheet
15. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Ferri, M., Davoli, M., & Perucci, C.A. (2006). Heroin maintenance treatment for chronic heroin-dependent individuals: A Cochrane systematic review of effectiveness. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30, 63-72.
17. Fischer, B., Chin, A.T., Kuo, I., Kirst, M., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Canadian illicit opiate users' views on methadone and other opiate prescription treatment: An exploratory qualitative study. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 495-522.
18. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
19. Fraser, S. (2006a). Speaking addictions: Substitution, metaphor and authenticity in newspaper representations ofmethadone treatment. Co temporary Drug Problems, 33, 669-698.
20. Fraser, S. (2006b). The chronotope of the queue: Methadone maintenance treatment and the production of time, space and subjects. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17, 192-202.
21. Fraser, S., & Valentine, K. (2008). Substance and substitution: Methadone subjects in liberal societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
22. Friedman, J., & Alicea, M. (1995). Women and heroin: The path of resistance and its consequences. Gender and Society, 9, 432-449.
23. Fries, B., Johnson, B., & Svensson, B. (2009). Moralism påverkar fortfarande narkomanvården. Dagens Nyheter, 2009-10-17.
24. Gomart, E. (2002). Methadone: Six effects in search of a substance. Social Studies of Science, 32, 93-135.
25. Gomart, E. (2004). Surprised by methadone: In praise of drug substitution treatment in a French clinic. Body and Society, 10, 85-110.
26. Gourlay, J., Ricciardelli, L., & Ridge, D. (2005). Users' experiences of heroin and methadone treatment. Substance Use and Misuse, 40, 1875-1882.
27. Grönbladh, L. (2004). A national Swedish methadone program 1966-1989. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet. 34pp summary. Retrieved from
28. Guichard, A., Lert, F., Brodeur, J.-M., & Richard, L. (2007). Buprenorphine substitution treatment in France: Drug users' views of the doctor-user relationship. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 2578-2593.
29. Heilig, M. (2004). Dum dogmatism dödar. Om substitutionsbehandling. In H. Tham (Ed.), Forskare om narkotikapolitiken (pp. 41-46). Rapport 2003:1. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet, Kriminologiska institutionen.
30. Holt, M. (2007). Agency and dependency within treatment: Drug treatment clients negotiating methadone and antidepressants. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1937-1947.
31. Howarth, D., Norval, A.J., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
32. Hughes, C.E. (2007). Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? The role of evidence in the development and implementation of the Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 363-368.
33. Hunt, N. (2004). Commentary. Public health or human rights: What comes first? International Journal of Drug Policy, 15, 231-237.
34. Johnson, B. (2007). After the storm: Developments in maintenance treatment policy and practice in Sweden 1987- 2006'. In J. Edman & K. Stenius (Eds.), On the margins: Nordic alcohol and drug treatment 1885-2007 (pp. 295-314).
35. NAD Publication No. 50. Helsinki: Nordic Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research.
36. Johnson, B., & Hagström, B. (2005). The translation perspective as an alternative to the policy diffusion paradigm: The case of the Swedish methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Social Policy, 34, 365-388.
37. Koester, S., Anderson, K., & Hoffer, L. (1999). Active heroin injectors' perceptions and use of methadone maintenance treatment: Cynical performance or self-prescribed risk reduction? Substance Use and Misuse, 34, 2135-2153.
38. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
39. Lee, H.S., & Petersen, S.R. (2009). Demarginalizing the marginalized in substance abuse treatment: Stories of homeless, active substance users in an urban harm reduction based drop-in center. Addiction Research and Theory, 17, 622-636.
40. Lilly, R., Quirk, A., Rhodes, T., & Stimson, G.V. (2000). Sociality in methadone treatment: Understanding methadone treatment and service delivery as a social process. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7, 163-178.
41. Mattick, R.P., Breen, C., Kimber, J., & Davoli, M. (2009). Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), Art. No. CD002209. Retrieved from
42. Mattick, R.P., Kimber, J., Breen, C., & Davoli, M. (2008). Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), Art. No. CD002207. Retrieved fromhttp://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/ CD002207/pdf-fs.html
43. McLellan, A.T., Arndt, I.O., Metzger, D.S., Woody, G.E., & O'Brien, C.P. (1993). The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 5, 38-47.
44. Neale, J. (1999a). Drug users' views of substitute prescribing conditions. International Journal of Drug Policy, 10, 247-258.
45. Neale, J. (1999b). Understanding drug-using clients' views of substitute prescribing. The British Journal of Social Work, 29, 127-145.
46. Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
47. Pinto, H., Rumball, D., & Holland, R. (2008). Attitudes andknowledge of substance misusers regarding buprenorphine and methadone maintenance therapy. Journal of Substance Use, 13, 143-153.
48. Room, R. (2005). Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 143-155.
49. Samuelsen, H., & Steffen, V. (2004). The relevance of Foucault and Bourdieu for medical anthropology: Exploring new sites. Anthropology and Medicine, 11, 3-10.
50. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
51. Socialstyrelsen (1988). Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter om metadonunderhå llsbehandling och förskrivning av opiater på indication narkomani. SOSFS, Socialstyrelsens författningssamling 1988:4. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
52. Socialstyrelsen (2004). Läkemedelsassisterad behandling vid opiatberoende. Föreskrifter och allmänna råd. SOSFS 2004:8, Socialstyrelsens författningssamling. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
53. Socialstyrelsen (2007). Läkemedelsassisterad underhå llsbehandling vid opiatberoende - Rapport från en nationellt samordnad granskning. Retrieved from
54. Socialstyrelsen (2009). Läkemedelsassisterad behandling vid opiatberoende. Föreskrifter och allmänna råd. SOSFS 2009:27, Socialstyrelsens författningssamling. Stockholm:Socialstyrelsen.
55. Socialstyrelsen (2010). Lägesrapport 2010. Retrieved from
56. Tammi, T. (2007). Medicalising prohibition: Harm reduction in Finnish and international drug policy. Research Report No. 161. Helsinki: Stakes.
57. Tham, H. (1995). Drug control as a national project: The case of Sweden. The Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 113-128.
58. Tops, D. (2001). A society with or without drugs? Continuity and change in drug policies in Sweden and the Netherlands. Lund Dissertations in Social Work 5. Lund: Lunds universitet, Socialhögskolan.
59. Treloar, C., & Holt, M. (2006). Deficit models and divergent philosophies: Service providers' perspectives on barriers and incentives to drug treatment. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 13, 367-382.
60. Valentine, K. (2007). Methadone maintenance treatment and making up people. Sociology, 41, 497-514.
61. Valentine, K. (2009). Evidence, values and drug treatment policy. Critical Social Policy, 29, 443-464.
62. Valentine, K., & Fraser, S. (2008). Trauma, damage and pleasure: Rethinking problematic drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19, 410-416.
63. Waal, H. (2003). Introduction. In H. Waal & E. Haga (Eds.), Maintenance treatment of heroin addiction. Evidence at the crossroads (pp. 7-9). Oslo: J.W. Cappelens Forlag.
64. WHO (2009). Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence. Geneva: WHO Press, World Health Organization. Retrieved from
65. Wodak, A. (2002). Methadone and heroin prescription: Babies and bath water. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 523-531.